'Defending the rights'. An integrated model of collective action for "public water" in Italy

In many communities, supplying water for the people is a huge task and the fact that this essential service can be carried out by the private sector respecting the right to water, is a debated issue. This dissertation investigates the mechanisms through which a 'perceived rights violation' - which represents a specific form of perceived injustice which derives from the violation of absolute moral principles – can promote collective action. Indeed, literature on morality and collective action suggests that even if many people apparently sustain high moral principles (like human rights), only a minority decides to act in order to defend them. Taking advantage of the political situation in Italy, and the recent mobilization for "public water" we hypothesized that, because of its "sacred value", the perceived violation of the right to water facilitates identification with the social movement and activism. Through five studies adopting qualitative and quantitative methods, we confirmed our hypotheses demonstrating that the perceived violation of the right to water can sustain activism and it can influence vote intentions at the referendum for 'public water'. This path to collective action coexists with other 'classical' predictors of collective action, like instrumental factors (personal advantages, efficacy beliefs) and anger. The perceived rights violation can derive both from personal values (i.e. universalism) and external factors (i.e. a mobilization campaign). Furthermore, we demonstrated that it is possible to enhance the perceived violation of the right to water and anger through a specifically designed communication campaign. The final chapter summarizes the main findings and discusses the results, suggesting some innovative line of research for collective action literature.

La drammatizzazione della storia. Uno studio del secondo Novecento attraverso i racconti del teatro di narrazione.

Sorto alla fine degli anni ottanta del Novecento, il teatro di narrazione ha raggiunto un notevole successo di pubblico a partire dagli anni Novanta. I suoi legami con il giornalismo d'inchiesta hanno condotto questo genere teatrale verso la narrazione di alcuni tra gli eventi pi controversi della storia dell'Italia repubblicana; eventi non ancora risolti sul piano processuale o al centro di una memoria storica fortemente divisa. Marco Baliani, Marco Paolini e Ascanio Celestini sono i tre autori che abbiamo scelto per affrontare un'analisi delle loro narrazioni in merito, rispettivamente, all'omicidio di Aldo Moro, alla strage di Ustica e all'eccidio delle Fosse Ardeatine. Oggetto della ricerca l'analisi dell'utilizzo delle fonti da dichiarate o comunque utilizzate dai narratori per la costruzione delle loro performances la loro selezione, la loro interpretazione e la loro disposizione nel testo e la messa in evidenza del problema della verità e del suo rapporto con il verosimile nelle narrazioni teatrali di eventi storici. Particolare attenzione viene inoltre posta al grande dibattito internazionale tra storia e fiction, alle strategie di coinvolgimento dell'opinione pubblica su temi morali e politici nonché all'analisi dei fattori economici e delle committenze che sono alla base di tali narrazioni.

Rodolfo Mondolfo : humanista de izquierda

El pensamiento de Rodolfo Mondolfo une la investigación historiográfico-filológica y la meditación práctica sobre la moral y la justicia, resuelta en términos socialistas. Esta unión entre planos distintos de su obra no ha sido suficientemente destacada. Su recepción argentina reporta esta dificultad en la comprensión de su legado, dada por la doble contrariedad que esa herencia representa: por un lado fue un filósofo italiano que vivió y enseñó en la Argentina, antes que un filósofo argentino. Por otro lado, Mondolfo no fue sólo un profesor investigador, sino un intelectual marxista obsesionado por la relación entre la teoría y una práctica revolucionaria de intención demorradical y nacionalista. Se esboza una semblanza de conjunto para mostrar su preocupación por elaborar una antropología filosófica voluntarista, tanto a la hora de configurar su imagen del mundo antiguo, como al momento de trazar las categorías atinentes a una ética socialista de la emancipación nacional.

Los Diálogos sobre religión natural de Hume : el teísmo moral o la utopía de Cleantes

En este artículo procuro elucidar el vínculo que David Hume establece entre religión y moral en los Diálogos sobre religión natural (1779). A la luz de esta temática pueden diferenciarse tres especies de religión: el teísmo mitigado, la religión vulgar y el teísmo moral. La primera variedad evita toda injerencia en la vida moral de las personas, en tanto que las dos últimas aspiran a regular el comportamiento. Por otra parte, si tomamos en cuenta el criterio de su existencia efectiva, el agrupamiento cambia: sólo los dos primeros tipos se dan en la realidad empírica, mientras que el tercero es un mero paradigma especulativo. Para esta clasificación tripartita resulta esencial, además, la disquisición acerca de la naturaleza divina. Ahora, en el marco de esta taxonomía, mi hipótesis central es que para Hume el teísmo moral es un mero tipo ideal con el cual algunos teólogos fantasean.

Vestigios de latinidad clásica en reglas monásticas visigodas

Las reglas monásticas visigodas constituyen un corpus documental de importancia fundamental para el estudio del monacato primitivo en Hispania. Ellas reflejan, entre otros aspectos, la preocupación por los ideales de vida de su época, heredados en parte de diversos tratados clásicos, que expresaban, desde aspectos más profundos vinculados a la moral, hasta reglas más precisas relacionadas con el modo de comportamiento en sociedad. En la temprana Edad Media, esta preocupación fue retomada por las comunidades monásticas, rescatando elementos propios de las costumbres latinas tradicionales. En dicho contexto, este estudio se propone analizar la presencia de vestigios de latinidad clásica en las reglas monacales visigodas, las cuales sirvieron como receptáculo de aquellas tradiciones destinadas a regular los distintos aspectos de la vida del monje.

Ser un trabajador estatal : Sentidos del trabajo, moralidades y acción colectiva de trabajadores de la salud pública

Los sistemas de auto-clasificación que enuncian los trabajadores del Hospital Castro Rendón de Neuquén son múltiples y se ponen en juego en diversos contextos, operando como categorías con las que se definen a sí mismos y a los otros. A partir de una estrategia metodológica cualitativa basada en la realización de observaciones participantes y entrevistas en profundidad, en este artículo se analiza cómo se pone en juego la categoría de 'trabajador estatal' en tanto forma de auto-adscripción en el trabajo cotidiano y durante los momentos de huelga. Los sentidos asociados al trabajo son centrales para comprender la lógica de acción de los actores, ya que sirven de sustento de una comunidad moral y profesional de trabajadores que se opone a los 'funcionarios' dentro de las estructuras del Estado provincial. A su vez ello permite mostrar la lógica en que se manifiestan las disputas en los procesos de gestión de las políticas de salud pública neuquina.

Ser un trabajador estatal : Sentidos del trabajo, moralidades y acción colectiva de trabajadores de la salud pública

Los sistemas de auto-clasificación que enuncian los trabajadores del Hospital Castro Rendón de Neuquén son múltiples y se ponen en juego en diversos contextos, operando como categorías con las que se definen a sí mismos y a los otros. A partir de una estrategia metodológica cualitativa basada en la realización de observaciones participantes y entrevistas en profundidad, en este artículo se analiza cómo se pone en juego la categoría de 'trabajador estatal' en tanto forma de auto-adscripción en el trabajo cotidiano y durante los momentos de huelga. Los sentidos asociados al trabajo son centrales para comprender la lógica de acción de los actores, ya que sirven de sustento de una comunidad moral y profesional de trabajadores que se opone a los 'funcionarios' dentro de las estructuras del Estado provincial. A su vez ello permite mostrar la lógica en que se manifiestan las disputas en los procesos de gestión de las políticas de salud pública neuquina.

Ser un trabajador estatal : Sentidos del trabajo, moralidades y acción colectiva de trabajadores de la salud pública

Los sistemas de auto-clasificación que enuncian los trabajadores del Hospital Castro Rendón de Neuquén son múltiples y se ponen en juego en diversos contextos, operando como categorías con las que se definen a sí mismos y a los otros. A partir de una estrategia metodológica cualitativa basada en la realización de observaciones participantes y entrevistas en profundidad, en este artículo se analiza cómo se pone en juego la categoría de 'trabajador estatal' en tanto forma de auto-adscripción en el trabajo cotidiano y durante los momentos de huelga. Los sentidos asociados al trabajo son centrales para comprender la lógica de acción de los actores, ya que sirven de sustento de una comunidad moral y profesional de trabajadores que se opone a los 'funcionarios' dentro de las estructuras del Estado provincial. A su vez ello permite mostrar la lógica en que se manifiestan las disputas en los procesos de gestión de las políticas de salud pública neuquina.

Ser un trabajador estatal : Sentidos del trabajo, moralidades y acción colectiva de trabajadores de la salud pública

Los sistemas de auto-clasificación que enuncian los trabajadores del Hospital Castro Rendón de Neuquén son múltiples y se ponen en juego en diversos contextos, operando como categorías con las que se definen a sí mismos y a los otros. A partir de una estrategia metodológica cualitativa basada en la realización de observaciones participantes y entrevistas en profundidad, en este artículo se analiza cómo se pone en juego la categoría de 'trabajador estatal' en tanto forma de auto-adscripción en el trabajo cotidiano y durante los momentos de huelga. Los sentidos asociados al trabajo son centrales para comprender la lógica de acción de los actores, ya que sirven de sustento de una comunidad moral y profesional de trabajadores que se opone a los 'funcionarios' dentro de las estructuras del Estado provincial. A su vez ello permite mostrar la lógica en que se manifiestan las disputas en los procesos de gestión de las políticas de salud pública neuquina.

El lenguaje clásico es atemporal. Entrevista a David Watkin

Watkin se ha distinguido como uno de los más certeros y sobrios polemistas y críticos arquitectónicos, como lo demuestra su celebérrimo ensayo Morality and Architecture (1977), una de las pocas obras imprescindibles en el debate arquitectónico del siglo XX, así como el gran numero de actos y campañas desarrolladas por él en defensa de la supervivencia de la tradición arquitectónica clásica y en solidaridad con los arriesgados arquitectos que hoy en día la representan. Esta faceta pública ha llevado a Watkin a las fronteras de la política y lo ha situado en el centro de un convulso debate público que aún se halla en pleno desarrollo, rodeando cada una de las obras de arquitectos estrella que se levantan en Inglaterra.

Is it a Sin to Talk about Sin in Therapy?

The role of morality and sin in therapy is a controversial topic. However, therapy has a distinctly moral nature, and the Christian concept of sin provides a helpful framework within which the therapist can effectively respond to clients' feeling guilt for their wrong doing as they present in therapy. This paper discusses how the moral nature of therapy must be understood and embraced if it is to encourage both insight and increased self-efficacy in treatment. The Christian concept of sin is discussed as well as a psychological definition of sin and its effects. A potential treatment approach is presented which emphasizes responsibility and restoration through insight, compassion, and increased self-efficacy. This approach is then displayed through a case example.

Three Dichotomies in Lawyers’ Ethics (With Particular Attention to the Corporation as Client)

Three usually unexpressed, and too often unnoticed, conceptual dichotomies underlie our perception and understanding of lawyers’ ethics. First, the existence of a special body of professional ethics and professional regulation presupposes some special need or risk. Criminal and civil law are apparently insufficient. Ordinary day-to-day morality and ordinary ethics, likewise, are not considered to be enough. What is the risk entailed by the notion of a profession that is special; who needs protection, and from what? Two quite different possible answers to this question provide the first of the three dichotomies examined in this article: one can understand the risk as primarily to a vulnerable client from a powerful professional; or, to the contrary, from a powerful client-lawyer combination toward vulnerable others. Second, what is the foundational orientation of lawyers? Are lawyers serving primarily their particular clients, and those clients’ preferences, choices and autonomy? Or is the primary allegiance of lawyers to some community or collective goal or interest distinct from the particular goals or interests of the client? The third dichotomy concerns not the substance of the risk, or the primary orientation, but the appropriate means of responding to that risk or that fundamental obligation. Should professional ethics be implemented primarily through rules? Or, should we rely on character and the discretion of lawyers to make a thought out, all things considered, decision? Each of these three presents a fundamental difference in how we perceive and address issues of lawyers’ ethics. Each affects our understanding and analysis on multiple levels, from (1) determining the appropriate or requisite conduct in a particular situation, to (2) framing a specific rule or approach for a particular category of situations, to (3) more general or abstract theory or policy. A person’s inclinations in regard to the dichotomies affects the conclusions that person will reach on each of those levels of analysis, yet those inclinations and assumptions are frequently unexamined and unarticulated. One’s position on each of the dichotomies tends to structure the approach and outcome without the issues and choice having been explicitly addressed or possibly even noticed. This article is an effort to ameliorate that problem. Part I addresses the question of what is the risk in the work of lawyers, or the function of lawyers, for which professional ethics is the answer. The concluding section focuses on the particular problem of the corporation as client. Part II then asks the related and possibly consequent question of what is the foundational orientation or allegiance of the lawyer? Is it to the individual client? Or is it to some larger community interest? Again, the concluding section focuses on the corporation. Part III turns to the means or method for addressing the obligations and possible problems of the professional ethics of lawyers. Should lawyers’ ethics guide and confine the conduct of lawyers primarily through rules? Or should it function primarily through reliance on the knowledge, judgment and character of lawyers? If the latter were the guide, ethical decisions would be made on a situation by situation basis under the discretion of each lawyer. Toward the end of each discussion possibilities for bridging the dichotomy are considered (and with such bridges each dichotomy may come to look more like a spectrum or continuum.). At several points after its introduction in Parts I and II, the special problem of the corporation as client is revisited and possible solutions suggested. Illustrating the usefulness of keeping the dichotomies in view, Part IV applies them to several exemplary situations of ethical difficulty in actual lawyer practice. For readers finding it difficult to envision the consequences of these distinctions, turning ahead to Part IV may be useful in making the discussion more concrete. Some commonalities across the dichotomies and connections among them are then developed in the concluding section, Part V.

Three Dichotomies in Lawyers’ Ethics (With Particular Attention to the Corporation as Client)

Three usually unexpressed, and too often unnoticed, conceptual dichotomies underlie our perception and understanding of lawyers’ ethics. First, the existence of a special body of professional ethics and professional regulation presupposes some special need or risk. Criminal and civil law are apparently insufficient. Ordinary day-to-day morality and ordinary ethics, likewise, are not considered to be enough. What is the risk entailed by the notion of a profession that is special; who needs protection, and from what? Two quite different possible answers to this question provide the first of the three dichotomies examined in this article: one can understand the risk as primarily to a vulnerable client from a powerful professional; or, to the contrary, from a powerful client-lawyer combination toward vulnerable others. Second, what is the foundational orientation of lawyers? Are lawyers serving primarily their particular clients, and those clients’ preferences, choices and autonomy? Or is the primary allegiance of lawyers to some community or collective goal or interest distinct from the particular goals or interests of the client? The third dichotomy concerns not the substance of therisk, or the primary orientation, but the appropriate means of responding to that risk or that fundamental obligation. Should professional ethics be implemented primarily through rules? Or, should we rely on character and the discretion of lawyers to make a thought out, all things considered, decision? Each of these three presents a fundamental difference in how we perceive and address issues of lawyers’ ethics. Each affects our understanding and analysis on multiple levels, from (1) determining the appropriate or requisite conduct in aparticular situation, to (2) framing a specific rule or approach for a particular category of situations, to (3) more general or abstract theory or policy. A person’s inclinations in regard to the dichotomies affects the conclusions that person will reach on each of those levels of analysis, yet those inclinations and assumptions are frequently unexamined and unarticulated. One’s position on each of the dichotomies tends to structure the approach and outcome without the issues and choice having been explicitly addressed or possibly even noticed. This article is an effort to ameliorate that problem. Part I addresses the question of what is the risk in the work of lawyers, or the function of lawyers, for which professional ethics is the answer. The concluding section focuses on the particular problem of the corporation as client. Part II then asks the related and possibly consequent question of what is the foundational orientation or allegiance of the lawyer? Is it to the individual client? Or is it to some larger community interest? Again, the concluding section focuses on thecorporation. Part III turns to the means or method for addressing the obligations and possible problems of the professional ethics of lawyers. Should lawyers’ ethics guide and confine the conduct of lawyers primarily through rules? Or should it function primarily through reliance on the knowledge, judgment and character of lawyers? If the latter were the guide, ethical decisions would be made on a situation by situation basis under the discretion of each lawyer. Toward the end of each discussion possibilities for bridging the dichotomy are considered (and with such bridges each dichotomy may come to look more like a spectrum or continuum.). At several points after its introduction in Parts I and II, the special problem of the corporation as client is revisited and possible solutions suggested. Illustrating the usefulness of keeping the dichotomies in view, Part IV applies them to several exemplary situations of ethical difficulty in actual lawyer practice. For readers finding it difficult to envision the consequences of these distinctions, turning ahead to Part IV may be useful in making the discussion more concrete. Some commonalities across the dichotomies and connections among them are then developed in the concluding section, Part V.

Introduction

Despite being widely acknowledged as one of the most important German dramatists since Bertolt Brecht, Heiner Muller (1929-95) still remains relatively unknown in the English-speaking world. This collection of plays aims to change that, presenting new translations and opening up his work to a larger audience. Collected here are three of his plays - "Philoctetes", "The Horatian", and "Mauser" - that together constitute what Muller called an "experimental series," which both develops and critiques Brecht's theory of the Lehrstuck, or "learning play." Based on a tragedy by Sophocles, Philoctetes dramatizes the confrontation between politics, morality, and the desire for revenge. The Horatian uses an incident from ancient Rome as an example of ways of approaching the moral ambiguity of the past. Finally, Mauser, set during the Russian civil war, examines the nature and ethics of revolutionary violence. The plays are accompanied by supporting materials written by Muller himself, as well as an introduction by Uwe Schutte that contextualizes the plays and speaks of their continued relevance today.