994 resultados para Lire pour apprendre


Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Abstract: Quantitative Methods (QM) is a compulsory course in the Social Science program in CEGEP. Many QM instructors assign a number of homework exercises to give students the opportunity to practice the statistical methods, which enhances their learning. However, traditional written exercises have two significant disadvantages. The first is that the feedback process is often very slow. The second disadvantage is that written exercises can generate a large amount of correcting for the instructor. WeBWorK is an open-source system that allows instructors to write exercises which students answer online. Although originally designed to write exercises for math and science students, WeBWorK programming allows for the creation of a variety of questions which can be used in the Quantitative Methods course. Because many statistical exercises generate objective and quantitative answers, the system is able to instantly assess students’ responses and tell them whether they are right or wrong. This immediate feedback has been shown to be theoretically conducive to positive learning outcomes. In addition, the system can be set up to allow students to re-try the problem if they got it wrong. This has benefits both in terms of student motivation and reinforcing learning. Through the use of a quasi-experiment, this research project measured and analysed the effects of using WeBWorK exercises in the Quantitative Methods course at Vanier College. Three specific research questions were addressed. First, we looked at whether students who did the WeBWorK exercises got better grades than students who did written exercises. Second, we looked at whether students who completed more of the WeBWorK exercises got better grades than students who completed fewer of the WeBWorK exercises. Finally, we used a self-report survey to find out what students’ perceptions and opinions were of the WeBWorK and the written exercises. For the first research question, a crossover design was used in order to compare whether the group that did WeBWorK problems during one unit would score significantly higher on that unit test than the other group that did the written problems. We found no significant difference in grades between students who did the WeBWorK exercises and students who did the written exercises. The second research question looked at whether students who completed more of the WeBWorK exercises would get significantly higher grades than students who completed fewer of the WeBWorK exercises. The straight-line relationship between number of WeBWorK exercises completed and grades was positive in both groups. However, the correlation coefficients for these two variables showed no real pattern. Our third research question was investigated by using a survey to elicit students’ perceptions and opinions regarding the WeBWorK and written exercises. Students reported no difference in the amount of effort put into completing each type of exercise. Students were also asked to rate each type of exercise along six dimensions and a composite score was calculated. Overall, students gave a significantly higher score to the written exercises, and reported that they found the written exercises were better for understanding the basic statistical concepts and for learning the basic statistical methods. However, when presented with the choice of having only written or only WeBWorK exercises, slightly more students preferred or strongly preferred having only WeBWorK exercises. The results of this research suggest that the advantages of using WeBWorK to teach Quantitative Methods are variable. The WeBWorK system offers immediate feedback, which often seems to motivate students to try again if they do not have the correct answer. However, this does not necessarily translate into better performance on the written tests and on the final exam. What has been learned is that the WeBWorK system can be used by interested instructors to enhance student learning in the Quantitative Methods course. Further research may examine more specifically how this system can be used more effectively.

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

How to Improve Pupils' Literacy? A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Action Lecture This article presents a cost-effectiveness analysis of an innovative teaching method run in some nursery and primary schools in Paris. This project, named Action Lecture, is designed to improve pupils' abilities and taste on literacy. We report the results of an evaluation of this program. We describe the experimental protocol that was built to estimate the program's impact on several types of indicators (academic abilities, attitude toward reading, school life) by comparing the evolution of treatment schools and control schools. Data were processed following a Differences-in-Differences (DID) method. Then we use the estimation of the impact on academic achievement to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis and take a reduction of the class size program as a benchmark. The results are positive for the Action Lecture program both in terms of impact's evaluation and in terms of cost-effectiveness ratio.

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Ce document est une version mise-à-jour du document "Lire la recherche utilisant des données qualitatives", décembre 2014 : http://hdl.handle.net/1866/11341

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Cette thèse s'inscrit dans le cadre d'une thématique d'interrelation recherche-formation-pratique. Elle a pour objectif principal d'étudier le lien entre les perceptions motivationnelles à apprendre d'élèves de troisième d'enseignement agricole et leur perception du modèle d'autorité de l'enseignant. Son caractère novateur repose sur l'interculturalité des approches utilisées: la motivation à apprendre empruntée aux études nord-américaines et le modèle d'autorité de l'enseignant empruntée aux études françaises. L'étape de recension des écrits nous a permis de préparer le terrain à un questionnaire de type quantitatif. Il comprend deux sections sur les modèles d'autorité (autoritaire et d'autorité) et trois sections sur les perceptions motivationnelles (valeur, sentiment de compétence et contrôlabilité) en lien avec deux matières: français et STP (sciences et techniques professionnelles). À la suite de cette investigation, les entrevues menées ont permis de découvrir deux cas de figure non envisagés au départ. Le premier est qu'un enseignant de tendance autoritaire sur l'axe relationnel n'altère pas la perception de la valeur de la matière si celui-ci autonomise et responsabilise les élèves et s'il est impliqué dans leur réussite. Il en est de même si cela rejoint les buts éloignés des élèves (brevet, projet personnel ou professionnel). Enfin, il ressort des résultats un troisième modèle d'autorité de l'enseignant inattendu qu'est l'enseignant manquant d'autorité. Il fait apparaître le besoin des élèves d'avoir un enseignant cadrant sur l'axe relationnel afin de contenir les apprentissages. Même si les apprentissages sont variés et novateurs et que l'enseignant est disponible et explique bien ses cours, ils ne sont pas suffisants pour motiver les élèves rencontrés. Il semble que le cadre donné par l'enseignant les sécurise, donne de la fiabilité à l'enseignant et de la valeur à la matière même s'il est de tendance autoritaire.