Representation and judgement : 'privileged' Jews in Holocaust writing and film

This thesis analyses the ways in which moral judgements of so-called privileged Jews are constructed in Holocaust representations. ‘Privileged’ Jews include those prisoners in the camps and ghettos who held positions which gave them access to material and other benefits. Subject to extreme levels of coercion, these victims were compelled to act in ways that have often been judged as both self-serving and harmful to fellow inmates. Such controversial figures constitute an intrinsically important, frequently misunderstood and hastily judged facet of the Holocaust. Scholars have neglected the problem of judgement in relation to ‘privileged’ Jews; nonetheless, Holocaust texts frequently portray these liminal figures.

Of crucial importance to the thesis is Primo Levi’s paradigmatic essay entitled ‘The Grey Zone,’ which directly engages with the complex and sensitive issue of ‘privileged’ Jews. Levi argues that due to the extreme ethical dilemmas that ‘privileged’ Jews confronted, any judgement of these victims needs to be suspended. However, if, as Levi suggests, judgement is at times impossible, the thesis challenges Levi’s assumption by contending that representations of ‘privileged’ Jews inevitably take a moral position. In this way, the thesis conceptualises judgement as a ‘limit’ of representation. Indeed, it is shown that Levi himself cannot abstain from judging those for whom he argues judgement should be suspended.

The thesis takes Levi’s concept of the ‘grey zone’ as a point of departure in order to examine the problems of judgement and representation in relation to ‘privileged’ Jews. Analysis focuses on Raul Hilberg’s influential historical work and examples of documentary and fiction films. The thesis examines how Hilberg and several filmmakers employ conventions as a means of conveying judgement. It is argued that self-reflexive representations of ‘privileged’ Jews in film, particularly fictional dramatisation, have the potential to provide a nuanced representation of ‘privileged’ Jews, which engages with Levi’s ideas by questioning the possibility of judgement.

Beyond ‘good’ and ‘evil’: breaking down binary oppositions in holocaust representations of ‘privileged’ Jews

In 1986, Auschwitz survivor Primo Levi’s paradigmatic essay entitled ‘The Grey Zone’ highlighted the complex and sensitive issue of so-called ‘privileged’ Jews, an issue that remains at the margins of popular and academic discourse on the Holocaust. ‘Privileged’ Jews include those prisoners in the Nazi concentration camps and ghettos who held positions that gave them access to material and other benefits whilst compelling them to act in ways that have been judged both self-serving and harmful to fellow inmates. The unprecedented ethical dilemmas that confronted ‘privileged’ Jews may be viewed as exemplifying the ‘limit’ events or experiences that were characteristic of the Holocaust, situating them at the threshold of representation, understanding and judgement. Levi’s essay singles out history and film as particularly predisposed to a simplifying trend he identifies – the ‘Manichean tendency which shuns half-tints and complexities,’ and resorts to the black-and-white binary opposition(s) of ‘friend’ and ‘enemy,’‘good’ and ‘evil.’ In the case of ‘privileged’ Jews in particular, such binary oppositions would appear to be inadequate. Adopting an interdisciplinary approach that incorporates the fields of history, philosophy and literature, this paper analyses representations of ‘privileged’ Jews, particularly those prisoners of the Sonderkommandos who were forced to work in the crematoria. The paper demonstrates how easily the boundary Levi maps out for moral judgement can be crossed. It is shown that while Levi suggests judgement should be suspended when confronted with the experiences of victims in extremis, moral evaluations of ‘privileged’ Jews permeate discussions and representations of the Holocaust. When confronted with such emotionally and morally freighted issues, judgement may itself be seen as a ‘limit of representation.’

Confronting 'choiceless choices' in Holocaust videotestimonies : judgement, 'privileged' Jews, and the role of the interviewer

'Privileged' Jews include those prisoners in the camps and ghettos who held positions which gave them access to material and other benefits. Subject to extreme levels of coercion, these victims were compelled to act in ways that have been judged as both self-serving and harmful to fellow inmates. Such situations, which exemplify what influential theorist Lawrence Langer terms 'choiceless choices', are the chief concern of Primo Levi's paradigmatic essay on the 'grey zone'. In light of these key conceptualizations of the ethical dilemmas of Holocaust victims, the paper analyses the representation of 'privileged' Jews in several videotestimonies recorded at the Jewish Holocaust Museum and Research Centre (JHMRC) in Melbourne, Australia. It will be shown that judgements of victims in extremis cause considerable problems for attempts to testify to the complex situations and experiences of 'privileged' Jews. The role of the interviewer is a crucial factor in this, particularly when interviewers are themselves Holocaust survivors. The paper reveals that while it might be argued that moral evaluations of 'privileged' Jews should be suspended, judgements are often imposed on Holocaust testimonies in various ways and have a significant impact on their content.

‘No one will ever know...’ : the Holocaust, ‘privileged’ Jews, and the ‘grey zone’

This paper explores the problems of judgement and representation in relation to Jewish victims of the Holocaust who occupied so-called privileged positions in the camps and ghettos. Such figures, forced to act in ways that have proven controversial both during and after the war, faced unprecedented ethical dilemmas under Nazi persecution. Taking Auschwitz survivor Primo Levi’s highly influential essay on the ‘grey zone’ as a point of departure, I examine the extreme situations confronted by prisoner doctors, an important – though little discussed – category of ‘privileged’ Jews. Investigating the synergies between history, memory and film, I focus particularly on the case of Gisella Perl, a prisoner doctor whose experiences in Auschwitz-Birkenau are represented in her memoir and a recent fiction film. The emotionally and morally fraught circumstances of prisoner doctors can never be fully understood, yet reflecting on the double binds they faced, and acknowledging the inherent problems involved in representing and judging them, enables a nuanced approach to the moral complexities of the Holocaust.

Narratives of judgement: representations of 'privileged' Jews in Holocaust documentaries

Auschwitz survivor Primo Levi’s highly influential essay, “The Grey Zone”, explores the taboo issue of “privileged” Jews, those prisoners who were forced to cooperate with their Nazi captors in order to prolong their lives or the lives of their families. Levi argues that moral evaluations of privileged Jews should be suspended; however, judgements of these liminal figures have permeated representations of victims’ experiences. Taking Levi’s reflections on the “grey zone” as a point of departure, I analyse the ways in which a number of Holocaust documentary narratives construct problematic judgements of privileged Jews; nonetheless, it will be shown that some films engage with the issue in a nuanced manner. While Levi singles out the medium of film as particularly predisposed to simplistic judgements, I argue that documentary film has considerable potential to offer a complex representation of the extreme ethical dilemmas that privileged Jews faced.

Os carnavais do Rio de Janeiro entre 1934 e 1937 e o movimento folclorista: dimensões do debate / The carnivals of Rio de Janeiro between 1934 and 1937 and the folklore movement: dimensions of the debate

Refletir sobre a relação entre os festejos carnavalescos e o movimento folclorista implica admitir as diferenças de perspectivas na constituição desses campos. Observa-se, inicialmente, que os processos de institucionalização dos carnavais brincados no Rio de Janeiro entre os anos 1934 e 1937, configuram um campo cultural à parte do movimento folclorista que se efetiva no Brasil nas décadas seguintes. Enquanto as práticas carnavalescas se consolidaram na década de 1930, em mediação com a imprensa e com o poder público, ligadas às preocupações de forjar a nacionalidade, o movimento folclórico tenta se institucionalizar, com o mesmo propósito, e definir seu campo de atuação e objetos de pesquisas, entre as décadas de 40 e 60. Porém, o carnaval não é o cerne desse debate e tampouco manifestação que deva se integrar às tradições brasileiras. 

Il dialogo con l'infanzia. Utopia del folklore, nonsense e comico in Gianni Rodari.

Nel trentennale dalla morte di Gianni Rodari, la tesi elabora problemi e riflessioni circa la maggiore urgenza corrente tra gli attuali studi rodariani: la necessità, per la cultura nazionale, di conferire a Gianni Rodari e alla letteratura per l’infanzia il ruolo intellettuale determinante da essi rivestito. La tesi sceglie di concentrarsi sui maggiori libri poetici e sul capolavoro teorico, la Grammatica della fantasia, utilizzando come strumenti il confronto con Gramsci, con la tradizione del folklore, con i grandi scrittori per l’infanzia dell’Inghilterra e con le altre esperienze poetiche del Novecento, discutendo Rodari da una specola esclusivamente filologica e letteraria. Parte prima: Rodari utopista. Nella prima parte Gianni Rodari viene inquadrato in un confronto diretto con l’Antonio Gramsci dei Quaderni, che aveva lucidamente individuato la separatezza tutta italiana tra classe intellettuale e mondo popolare, con conseguente inesistenza di una letteratura nazionale-popolare e di una specifica letteratura per l’infanzia. Rodari, primo intellettuale a dedicare tutto se stesso al riempimento di questa lacuna, risponde con intento sociale e politico al problema, adottando un atteggiamento che la tesi definisce utopico. Tramite una disamina del pensiero delle utopie letterarie a confronto con la tradizione popolare del paese di Cuccagna, la tesi procede all’accurato rinvenimento nell’opera di Rodari dei luoghi utopici, tutti orientati a suggerire un utilizzo dell’utopia come chiave per forzare un presente insoddisfacente e accedere a un futuro costruito da ogni individuo in prima persona. Parte seconda: Rodari poeta nonsense? Scritta in Inghilterra presso l’Istitute of Germanic and Romance Studies della University of London, la seconda e corposa parte della tesi si propone come un ampliamento della traccia gettata nel 1983 dall’articolo di Cristina Bertea Gianni Rodari in Gran Bretagna. La tesi analizza dapprima il problema del nonsense, ancora scarsamente trattato in Italia, riflettendo criticamente sulla maggiore bibliografia anglosassone che ha studiato il tema. Successivamente, mette a raffronto il lavoro linguistico che Gianni Rodari ha compiuto lungo l’arco di tutta la vita e le tecniche di composizione poetica elaborate nella Grammatica della fantasia con gli strumenti retorico-formali del nonsense individuati nell’opera di Lewis Carroll, di Edward Lear e delle nursery rhymes inglesi. Parte terza: Traccia per una mappatura della poesia per l’infanzia in Italia, a partire da Gianni Rodari. L’ultima parte della tesi si avventura alla ricerca di un percorso possibile attraverso la poesia per l’infanzia del Novecento e le sue esperienze di comicità. I capitoli si soffermano sul nonsense di Toti Scialoja e di Nico Orengo, sui precedenti di Lina Schwarz e Alfonso Gatto, sul Petel di Zanzotto, sulla poesia di soglia di Vivian Lamarque e sull’eredità della Grammatica della fantasia con particolare riferimento a Calicanto, di Ersilia Zamponi e Roberto Piumini.