Clinical utility of ocular residual astigmatism and topographic disparity vector indexes in subclinical and clinical keratoconus

Purpose. We aimed to characterize the distribution of the vector parameters ocular residual astigmatism (ORA) and topography disparity (TD) in a sample of clinical and subclinical keratoconus eyes, and to evaluate their diagnostic value to discriminate between these conditions and healthy corneas. Methods. This study comprised a total of 43 keratoconic eyes (27 patients, 17–73 years) (keratoconus group), 11 subclinical keratoconus eyes (eight patients, 11–54 years) (subclinical keratoconus group) and 101 healthy eyes (101 patients, 15–64 years) (control group). In all cases, a complete corneal analysis was performed using a Scheimpflug photography-based topography system. Anterior corneal topographic data was imported from it to the iASSORT software (ASSORT Pty. Ltd), which allowed the calculation of ORA and TD. Results. Mean magnitude of the ORA was 3.23 ± 2.38, 1.16 ± 0.50 and 0.79 ± 0.43 D in the keratoconus, subclinical keratoconus and control groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Mean magnitude of the TD was 9.04 ± 8.08, 2.69 ± 2.42 and 0.89 ± 0.50 D in the keratoconus, subclinical keratoconus and control groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Good diagnostic performance of ORA (cutoff point: 1.21 D, sensitivity 83.7 %, specificity 87.1 %) and TD (cutoff point: 1.64 D, sensitivity 93.3 %, specificity 92.1 %) was found for the detection of keratoconus. The diagnostic ability of these parameters for the detection of subclinical keratoconus was more limited (ORA: cutoff 1.17 D, sensitivity 60.0 %, specificity 84.2 %; TD: cutoff 1.29 D, sensitivity 80.0 %, specificity 80.2 %). Conclusion. The vector parameters ORA and TD are able to discriminate with good levels of precision between keratoconus and healthy corneas. For the detection of subclinical keratoconus, only TD seems to be valid.

Diversity for Texts Builds in Language L(MT) II: Indexes Based in Abundances

One saw previously that indications of diversity IT and the one of Shannon permits to characterize globally by only one number one fundamental aspects of the text structure. However a more precise knowledge of this structure requires specific abundance distributions and the use, to represent this one, of a suitable mathematical model. Among the numerous models that would be either susceptible to be proposed, the only one that present a real convenient interest are simplest. One will limit itself to study applied three of it to the language L(MT): the log-linear, the log-normal and Mac Arthur's models very used for the calculation of the diversity of the species of ecosystems, and used, we believe that for the first time, in the calculation of the diversity of a text written in a certain language, in our case L(MT). One will show advantages and inconveniences of each of these model types, methods permitting to adjust them to text data and in short tests that permit to decide if this adjustment is acceptable.

Une analyse des revues indexées dans le KLAPP (Bibliographie d'histoire littéraire française)

Résultats préliminaires d'un projet de comparaison des deux plus importants répertoires bibliographiques spécialisés en littératures de langue française (accessibles sous forme de bases de données bibliographiques en ligne depuis 2014) : la « Bibliographie de la littérature française » (« Bibliographie der französischen Literaturwissenschaft » ou « KLAPP »), publiée chez Klostermann depuis 1956, et la « Bibliographie de la littérature française » (ou « Rancoeur », précédemment intitulée « Bibliographie de la littérature française), publiée depuis 1953 chez Armand Colin et aux Presses universitaires de France (sous forme de hors-série annuel de la « Revue d'histoire littéraire de la France ») puis chez Classiques Garnier.

Indexes of agricultural production for the Western Hemisphere, excluding the United States : rev. 1958 through 1966, preliminary 1967.

Mode of access: Internet.

Engineering materials list : cumulative indexes /

"Subject Index for Supplements 13 through 26; Engineering Category Index for Supplements 1 through 26; Corporate Author Index for Supplements 13 through 26."

Contemporary British literature; outlines for study, indexes, bibliographies, by John Matthews Manly and Edith Rickert.

Mode of access: Internet.