901 resultados para Illinois National Guard Study Commission
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
"April, 1983."
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Chairman: Representative Richard A. Mautino; co-chairman, Representative A. T. McMaster.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Cover title.
Resumo:
"November 2010."
Resumo:
"October 1965."
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
"This study is a part of the Commission's Bicentennial Program, and ... was conducted and written by Frederick Gutheim."
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Our cross-national field study of wine entrepreneurship in the “wrong” places provides some redress to the focus of the “regional advantage” literature on places that have already won and on the firms that benefit from “clusters” and other centers of industry advantage. Regional “disadvantage” is at best a shadowy afterthought to this literature. By poking around in these shadows, we help to synthesize and extend the incipient yet burgeoning literature on entrepreneurial “resourcefulness” and we contribute to the developing body of insights and theory pertinent to the numerous but often ignored firms and startups that mostly need to worry about how they will compete at all now if they are ever to have of chance of “winning” in the future. The core of our findings suggests that understandable – though contested – processes of ingenuity underlie entrepreneurial responses to regional disadvantage. Because we study entrepreneurship that from many angles simply does not make sense, we are also able to proffer a novel perspective on entrepreneurial sensemaking.
Resumo:
Our cross-national field study of wine entrepreneurship in the “wrong” places provides some redress to the focus of the “regional advantage” literature on places that have already won and on the firms that benefit from “clusters” and other centers of industry advantage. Regional “disadvantage” is at best a shadowy afterthought to this literature. By poking around in these shadows, we help to synthesize and extend the incipient yet burgeoning literature on entrepreneurial “resourcefulness” and we contribute to the developing body of insights and theory pertinent to the numerous but often ignored firms and startups that mostly need to worry about how they will compete at all now if they are ever to have of chance of “winning” in the future. The core of our findings suggests that understandable – though contested – processes of ingenuity underlie entrepreneurial responses to regional disadvantage. Because we study entrepreneurship that from many angles simply does not make sense, we are also able to proffer a novel perspective on entrepreneurial sensemaking.