Upper Arm Measurements of Healthy Neonates Comparing Ultrasonography and Anthropometric Methods

Objective: To compare measurements of the upper arm cross-sectional areas (total arm area,arm muscle area, and arm fat area of healthy neonates) as calculated using anthropometry with the values obtained by ultrasonography. Materials and methods: This study was performed on 60 consecutively born healthy neonates: gestational age (mean6SD) 39.661.2 weeks, birth weight 3287.16307.7 g, 27 males (45%) and 33 females (55%). Mid-arm circumference and tricipital skinfold thickness measurements were taken on the left upper mid-arm according to the conventional anthropometric method to calculate total arm area, arm muscle area and arm fat area. The ultrasound evaluation was performed at the same arm location using a Toshiba sonolayer SSA-250AÒ, which allows the calculation of the total arm area, arm muscle area and arm fat area by the number of pixels enclosed in the plotted areas. Statistical analysis: whenever appropriate, parametric and non-parametric tests were used in order to compare measurements of paired samples and of groups of samples. Results: No significant differences between males and females were found in any evaluated measurements, estimated either by anthropometry or by ultrasound. Also the median of total arm area did not differ significantly with either method (P50.337). Although there is evidence of concordance of the total arm area measurements (r50.68, 95% CI: 0.55–0.77) the two methods of measurement differed for arm muscle area and arm fat area. The estimated median of measurements by ultrasound for arm muscle area were significantly lower than those estimated by the anthropometric method, which differed by as much as 111% (P,0.001). The estimated median ultrasound measurement of the arm fat was higher than the anthropometric arm fat area by as much as 31% (P,0.001). Conclusion: Compared with ultrasound measurements using skinfold measurements and mid-arm circumference without further correction may lead to overestimation of the cross-sectional area of muscle and underestimation of the cross-sectional fat area. The correlation between the two methods could be interpreted as an indication for further search of correction factors in the equations.

Upper Arm Anthropometry Is Not a Valid Predictor of Regional Body Composition in Preterm Infants

Background: Upper arm anthropometry has been used in the nutritional assessment of small infants, but it has not yet been validated as a predictor of regional body composition in this population. Objective: Validation of measured and derived upper arm anthropometry as a predictor of arm fat and fat-free compartments in preterm infants. Methods: Upper arm anthropometry, including the upper arm cross-sectional areas, was compared individually or in combination with other anthropometric measurements, with the cross-sectional arm areas measured by magnetic resonance imaging, in a cohort of consecutive preterm appropriate-for-gestationalage neonates, just before discharge. Results: Thirty infants born with (mean 8 SD) a gestational age of 30.7 8 1.9 weeks and birth weight of 1,380 8 325 g, were assessed at 35.4 8 1.1 weeks of corrected gestational age, weighing 1,785 8 93 g. None of the anthropometric measurements are reliable predictors (r 2 ! 0.56) of the measurements obtained by magnetic resonance imaging, individually or in combination with other anthropometric measurements. Conclusion: Both measured anthropometry and derived upper arm anthropometry are inaccurate predictors of regional body composition in preterm appropriate-for-gestational-age infants.

Apendicite Aguda - Clínica Versus Histologia

Introdução: A apendicite aguda continua a ser um dos principais diagnósticos nos Serviços de Cirurgia Pediátrica. A taxa de apendicectomia negativa (apendicectomia sem evidência histológica de patologia), frequentemente utilizada como índice de qualidade hospitalar, permanece alta, apesar dos esforços para a reduzir, especialmente em crianças com menos de 6 anos. Objectivos: os objectivos primários foram: o cálculo da taxa de apendicectomia negativa, da concordância entre diagnóstico clínico (pós-operatório) e diagnóstico histológico e a caracterização da discordância diagnóstica por tipo de apendicite (fleimonosa, gangrenada, perfurada). A caracterização dos grupos apendicectomia negativa (A) e apendicites perfuradas (B), bem como a relação entre estes dois grupos ao longo dos anos, constituíram objectivos secundários. Material e Método: Estudo retrospectivo dos dados clínicos de 1000 doentes consecutivamente operados com o diagnóstico clínico de apendicite aguda, no Hospital de Dona Estefânia, no período de 1 de Janeiro 2003 – 30 de Setembro 2007, procedendo-se à consulta da folha de requisição de exame histo-patológico enviada para o Serviço de Anatomia Patológica. Foram revistos os dados epidemiológicos, a qualidade da informação da referida folha de requisição e calculada a taxa de apendicectomia negativa nesta amostra. Resultados: O diagnóstico clínico pós-operatório foi concordante com o diagnóstico histológico em cerca de 60% casos, sendo subvalorizado ou sobrevalorizado nos restantes casos. A taxa de apendicectomia negativa observada foi de 5,5%, o que está abaixo dos valores apresentados na literatura. Conclusões: As apendicectomias negativas devem ser um “mal menor” em relação às apendicites perfuradas. A discordância clínico-histológica pode ter implicações médico-legais e tem seguramente implicações clínicas e económicas pelo que urge reavaliar o modelo de abordagem desta patologia tão frequente.

Bases Clínicas e Laboratoriais para o Diagnóstico e Compreensão das Doenças Metabólicas Neonatais

The authors divide neonatal metabolic diseases into two major groups: intoxication and energy deficiency. The main signs which allow for the suspicion of the diagnosis are indicated for each group. The complementary examinations to be carried out by the Clinical Pathology Service of the Central Hospital and those which must be carried out by the metabolic diseases Reference Centre are reviewed. Based on the clinical framework and on the examination results, the authors establish five syndromatic groups to orientate diagnosis. The authors conclude by presenting differential diagnosis tables based on the original systematic classification by Jean-Marie Saudubray, with up-dated modifications from their own experience.

Ressurgimento da Febre Reumática. Novas Causas ou Velhas Atitudes?

Dado que nos últimos anos se tem verificado um aumento da incidência da Febre Reumática (F.R.), assumiu-se como objectivo deste trabalho tentar avaliar as causas dos casos ocorridos recentemente entre nós. Analisaram-se os processos de três crianças nascidas e residentes em Portugal, com o primeiro surto conhecido de F.R., observadas entre Junho de 1993 e Março de 1994. Um caso apresentou-se com poliartrite, um com poliartrite e cardite e outro com coreia e cardite. Apenas num deles a hipótese de F.R. foi colocada de início e no global foi possível identificar falhas na profilaxia e no diagnóstico ecocardiográfico da valvulopatia. Concluiu-se que entre nós, e face a estes exemplos, o recrudescimento e a morbilidade da Febre Reumática, se deve provavelmente mais ao esquecimento de velhas atitudes do que a novas causas. Os atrasos no diagnóstico e a profilaxia secundária podem influenciar os resultados a longo prazo.