Comparison of manual and user guided methodologies for the classification and retrieval of construction site images

The amount of original imaging information produced yearly during the last decade has experienced a tremendous growth in all industries due to the technological breakthroughs in digital imaging and electronic storage capabilities. This trend is affecting the construction industry as well, where digital cameras and image databases are gradually replacing traditional photography. Owners demand complete site photograph logs and engineers store thousands of images for each project to use in a number of construction management tasks like monitoring an activity's progress and keeping evidence of the "as built" in case any disputes arise. So far, retrieval methodologies are done manually with the user being responsible for imaging classification according to specific rules that serve a limited number of construction management tasks. New methods that, with the guidance of the user, can automatically classify and retrieve construction site images are being developed and promise to remove the heavy burden of manually indexing images. In this paper, both the existing methods and a novel image retrieval method developed by the authors for the classification and retrieval of construction site images are described and compared. Specifically a number of examples are deployed in order to present their advantages and limitations. The results from this comparison demonstrates that the content based image retrieval method developed by the authors can reduce the overall time spent for the classification and retrieval of construction images while providing the user with the flexibility to retrieve images according different classification schemes.

An interpretative history of the Pacific Missile Test Center : the genesis: road to Point Mugu 1936-1946 /

Includes appendixes.

Analysis of missile trajectory measurement accuracy for data processing

"Contract no. AF 30(602)-2138, Project 5554, Task 55102."

History of tracks and track testing at the Air Force Missile Development Center, Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico,

Bibliographical references in "Notes."

Operator and organizational maintenance manual : azimuth laying set, 1430-01-095-5962, Lance Field Artillery Missile System.

Includes index.

Organizational maintenance repair parts and special tools list for computer, missile programmer-test station 11052000-29, 11051951-19, 1430-00-078-8098, 1430-01-007-3855, Pershing 1A Field Artillery Missile System.

Includes index.

Organizational maintenance repair parts and special tools list for monitor-programmer, missile guidance set, AN/GJM-24, 1430-00-937-0897 (Lance Field Artillery Missile System).

Includes index.

Organizational, direct support and general support maintenance repair parts and special tools list including depot maintenance repair parts and special tools for azimuth laying set, 1430-01-095-5962, Lance Field Artillery Missile System.

Includes index.

A chronology of missile and astronautic events;

"Serial b."

Creative industries as a globally contestable policy field

The development of the creative industries “proposition” has caused a great deal of controversy. Even as it has been examined and adopted in several, quite diverse, jurisdictions as a policy language seeking to respond to both creative production and consumption in new economic conditions, it is subject to at times withering critique from within academic media, cultural and communication studies. It is held to promote a simplistic narrative of the merging of culture and economics and represents incoherent policy; the data sources are suspect and underdeveloped; there is a utopianization of “creative” labor; and a benign globalist narrative of the adoption of the idea. This article looks at some of these critiques of creative industries idea and argues against them.

From the consciousness industry to the creative industries : consumer-created content, social network markets, & the growth of knowledge

In studies of media industries, too much attention has been paid to providers and firms, too little to consumers and markets. But with user-created content, the question first posed more than a generation ago by the uses & gratifications method and taken up by semiotics and the active audience tradition (‘what do audiences do with media?’), has resurfaced with renewed force. What’s new is that where this question (of what the media industries and audiences did with each other) used to be individualist and functionalist, now, with the advent of social networks using Web 2.0 affordances, it can be re-posed at the level of systems and populations as well.