Statnote 20: non-linear regression: fitting a general polynomial curve

In some circumstances, there may be no scientific model of the relationship between X and Y that can be specified in advance and indeed the objective of the investigation may be to provide a ‘curve of best fit’ for predictive purposes. In such an example, the fitting of successive polynomials may be the best approach. There are various strategies to decide on the polynomial of best fit depending on the objectives of the investigation.

Discriminant Sets of Families of Hyperbolic Polynomials of Degree 4 and 5

∗ Research partially supported by INTAS grant 97-1644

Generalization of a Conjecture in the Geometry of Polynomials

In this paper we survey work on and around the following conjecture, which was first stated about 45 years ago: If all the zeros of an algebraic polynomial p (of degree n ≥ 2) lie in a disk with radius r, then, for each zero z1 of p, the disk with center z1 and radius r contains at least one zero of the derivative p′ . Until now, this conjecture has been proved for n ≤ 8 only. We also put the conjecture in a more general framework involving higher order derivatives and sets defined by the zeros of the polynomials.

On Representations of Algebraic Polynomials by Superpositions of Plane Waves

* The author was supported by NSF Grant No. DMS 9706883.

Quadratic Mean Radius of a Polynomial in C(Z)

* Dedicated to the memory of Prof. N. Obreshkoff

Polynomial Expansions for Solutions of Higher-Order Bessel Heat Equation in Quantum Calculus

Mathematics Subject Class.: 33C10,33D60,26D15,33D05,33D15,33D90

Rolle's Theorem for Complex Polynomials with Real Coefficients

Let p(z) be an algebraic polynomial of degree n ¸ 2 with real coefficients and p(i) = p(¡i). According to Grace-Heawood Theorem, at least one zero of the derivative p0(z) is on the disk with center in the origin and radius cot(¼=n). In this paper is found the smallest domain containing at leas one zero of the derivative p0(z).

On Arrangements of Real Roots of a Real Polynomial and Its Derivatives

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 12D10.

Overdetermined Strata in General Families of Polynomials

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 12D10.

On the Factorization of the Poincaré Polynomial: A Survey

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 13P05, 14M15, 14M17, 14L30.

On Root Arrangements of Polynomial-Like Functions and their Derivatives

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 12D10.

A Geometrical Construction for the Polynomial Invariants of some Reflection Groups

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 20F55, 13F20; Secondary 14L30.

Sturm Sequences and Modified Subresultant Polynomial Remainder Sequences

ACM Computing Classification System (1998): F.2.1, G.1.5, I.1.2.

Three New Methods for Computing Subresultant Polynomial Remainder Sequences (PRS’S)

Given the polynomials f, g ∈ Z[x] of degrees n, m, respectively, with n > m, three new, and easy to understand methods — along with the more efficient variants of the last two of them — are presented for the computation of their subresultant polynomial remainder sequence (prs). All three methods evaluate a single determinant (subresultant) of an appropriate sub-matrix of sylvester1, Sylvester’s widely known and used matrix of 1840 of dimension (m + n) × (m + n), in order to compute the correct sign of each polynomial in the sequence and — except for the second method — to force its coefficients to become subresultants. Of interest is the fact that only the first method uses pseudo remainders. The second method uses regular remainders and performs operations in Q[x], whereas the third one triangularizes sylvester2, Sylvester’s little known and hardly ever used matrix of 1853 of dimension 2n × 2n. All methods mentioned in this paper (along with their supporting functions) have been implemented in Sympy and can be downloaded from the link http://inf-server.inf.uth.gr/~akritas/publications/subresultants.py

On the Remainders Obtained in Finding the Greatest Common Divisor of Two Polynomials

In 1917 Pell (1) and Gordon used sylvester2, Sylvester’s little known and hardly ever used matrix of 1853, to compute(2) the coefficients of a Sturmian remainder — obtained in applying in Q[x], Sturm’s algorithm on two polynomials f, g ∈ Z[x] of degree n — in terms of the determinants (3) of the corresponding submatrices of sylvester2. Thus, they solved a problem that had eluded both J. J. Sylvester, in 1853, and E. B. Van Vleck, in 1900. (4) In this paper we extend the work by Pell and Gordon and show how to compute (2) the coefficients of an Euclidean remainder — obtained in finding in Q[x], the greatest common divisor of f, g ∈ Z[x] of degree n — in terms of the determinants (5) of the corresponding submatrices of sylvester1, Sylvester’s widely known and used matrix of 1840. (1) See the link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Johnson_Pell_Wheeler for her biography (2) Both for complete and incomplete sequences, as defined in the sequel. (3) Also known as modified subresultants. (4) Using determinants Sylvester and Van Vleck were able to compute the coefficients of Sturmian remainders only for the case of complete sequences. (5) Also known as (proper) subresultants.