995 resultados para DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY


Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Pós-graduação em Biopatologia Bucal - ICT

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Aims: This study compared fractal dimension (FD) values on mandibular trabecular bone in digital and digitized images at different spatial and contrast resolutions. Materials and Methods: 12 radiographs of dried human mandibles were obtained using custom-fabricated hybrid image receptors composed of a periapical radiographic film and a photostimulable phosphor plate (PSP). The film/ PSP sets were disassembled, and the PSPs produced images with 600 dots per inch (dpi) and 16 bits. These images were exported as tagged image file format (TIFF), 16 and 8 bits, and 600, 300 and 150 dpi. The films were processed and digitized 3 times on a flatbed scanner, producing TIFF images with 600, 300 and 150 dpi, and 8 bits. On each image, a circular region of interest was selected on the trabecular alveolar bone, away from root apices and FD was calculated by tile counting method. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test were conducted to compare the mean values of FD, according to image type and spatial resolution (α = 5%). Results: Spatial resolution was directly and inversely proportional to FD mean values and standard deviation, respectively. Spatial resolution of 150 dpi yielded significant lower mean values of FD than the resolutions of 600 and 300 dpi ( P < 0.05). A nonsignificant variability was observed for the image types ( P > 0.05). The interaction between type of image and level of spatial resolution was not signi fi cant (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Under the tested, conditions, FD values of the mandibular trabecular bone assessed either by digital or digitized images did not change. Furthermore, these values were in fluenced by lower spatial resolution but not by contrast resolution.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Objectives: To compare, in vivo, the accuracy of conventional and digital radiographic methods in determining root canal working length. Material and Methods: Twenty-five maxillary incisor or canine teeth from 22 patients were used in this study. Considering the preoperative radiographs as the baseline, a 25 K file was inserted into the root canal to the point where the Root ZX electronic apex locator indicated the APEX measurement in the screen. From this measurement, 1 mm was subtracted for positioning the file. The radiographic measurements were made using a digital sensor (Digora 1.51) or conventional type-E films, size 2, following the paralleling technique, to determine the distance of the file tip and the radiographic apex. Results: The Student "t" test indicated mean distances of 1.11 mm to conventional and 1.20 mm for the digital method and indicated a significant statistical difference (p<0.05). Conclusions: The conventional radiographic method was found to be superior to the digital one in determining the working length of the root canal.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyse the use of digital tools for image enhancement of mandibular radiolucent lesions and the effects of this manipulation on the percentage of correct radiographic diagnoses. Methods: 24 panoramic radiographs exhibiting radiolucent lesions were selected, digitized and evaluated by non-experts (undergraduate and newly graduated practitioners) and by professional experts in oral diagnosis. The percentages of correct and incorrect diagnoses, according to the use of brightness/contrast, sharpness, inversion, highlight and zoom tools, were compared. All dental professionals made their evaluations without (T-1) and with (T-2) a list of radiographic diagnostic parameters. Results: Digital tools were used with low frequency mainly in T-2. The most preferred tool was sharpness (45.2%). In the expert group, the percentage of correct diagnoses did not change when any of the digital tools were used. For the non-expert group, there was an increase in the frequency of correct diagnoses when brightness/contrast was used in T-2 (p = 0.008) and when brightness/contrast and sharpness were not used in T-1 (p = 0.027). The use or non-use of brightness/contrast, zoom and sharpness showed moderate agreement in the group of experts [kappa agreement coefficient (kappa) = 0.514, 0.425 and 0.335, respectively]. For the non-expert group there was slight agreement for all the tools used (kappa <= 0.237). Conclusions: Consulting the list of radiographic parameters before image manipulation reduced the frequency of tool use in both groups of examiners. Consulting the radiographic parameters with the use of some digital tools was important for improving correct diagnosis only in the group of non-expert examiners. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2012) 41, 203-210. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/78567773

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

PURPOSE: To compare the direct and indirect radiographic methods for assessing the gray levels of biomaterials employing the Digora for Windows and the Adobe Photoshop CS2 systems. METHODS: Specimens of biomaterials were made following manusfacturer's instructions and placed on phosphor storage plates (PSP) and on radiographic film for subsequent gray level assessment using the direct and indirect radiographic method, respectively. The radiographic density of each biomaterial was analyzed using Adobe Photoshop CS2 and Digora for Windows software. RESULTS: The distribution of gray levels found using the direct and indirect methods suggests that higher exposure times are correlated to lower reproducibility rates between groups. CONCLUSION: The indirect method is a feasible alternative to the direct method in assessing the radiographic gray levels of biomaterials, insofar as significant reproducibility was observed between groups for the exposure times of 0.2 to 0.5 seconds.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

We assessed the diagnostic accuracy and time effectiveness of the Statscan low-dose full-body digital x-ray machine in the evaluation of ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt dysfunction.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

OBJECTIVE: Foreign body ingestion is common and potentially lethal. This study evaluates the use of low-dose Statscans (LODOX) in emergency departments. DESIGN: This comparative cross-sectional study retrospectively assessed 28 289 digital chest x-rays and 2301 LODOX scans performed between 2006 and 2010 at a tertiary emergency centre. The radiographic appearance, image quality and location of ingested foreign bodies were evaluated in standard digital chest and LODOX radiography. The mean irradiation (μSv) and cumulative mean radiation dose per patient with the ingested foreign body were calculated according to literature-based data, together with the sensitivity and specificity for each modality. RESULTS: A total of 62 foreign bodies were detected in 39 patients, of whom 19 were investigated with LODOX and 20 with conventional digital chest radiography. Thirty-three foreign bodies were located in the two upper abdominal quadrants, 21 in the lower quadrants-which are not visible on conventional digital chest radiography-seven in the oesophagus and one in the bronchial system. The sensitivity and specificity of digital chest radiography were 44.4% and 94.1%, respectively, and for the LODOX Statscan 90% and 100%, respectively. The calculated mean radiation dose for LODOX investigations was 184 μS, compared with 524 μS for digital chest radiography. CONCLUSIONS: LODOX Statscan is superior to digital chest radiography in the diagnostic work-up of ingested foreign bodies because it makes it possible to enlarge the field of view to the entire body, has higher sensitivity and specificity, and reduces the radiation dose by 65%.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

When patients enter our emergency room with suspected multiple injuries, Statscan provides a full body anterior and lateral image for initial diagnosis, and then zooms in on specific smaller areas for a more detailed evaluation. In order to examine the possible role of Statscan in the management of multiply injured patients we implemented a modified ATLS((R)) algorithm, where X-ray of C-spine, chest and pelvis have been replaced by single-total a.p./lat. body radiograph. Between 15 October 2006 and 1 February 2007 143 trauma patients (mean ISS 15+/-14 (3-75)) were included. We compared the time in resuscitation room to 650 patients (mean ISS 14+/-14 (3-75)) which were treated between 1 January 2002 and 1 January 2004 according to conventional ATLS protocol. The total-body scanning time was 3.5 min (3-6 min) compared to 25.7 (8-48 min) for conventional X-rays, The total ER time was unchanged 28.7 min (13-58 min) compared to 29.1 min (15-65 min) using conventional plain radiography. In 116/143 patients additional CT scans were necessary. In 98/116 full body trauma CT scans were performed. In 18/116 patients selective CT scans were ordered based on Statscan findings. In 43/143 additional conventional X-rays had to be performed, mainly due to inadequate a.p. views of fractured bones. All radiographs were transmitted over the hospital network (Picture Archiving and Communication System, PACS) for immediate simultaneous viewing at different places. The rapid availability of images for interpretation because of their digital nature and the reduced need for repeat exposures because of faulty radiography are also felt to be strengths.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

BACKGROUND: Lodox-Statscan is a whole-body, skeletal and soft-tissue, low-dose X-ray scanner Anterior-posterior and lateral thoraco-abdominal studies are obtained in 3-5 minutes with only about one-third of the radiation required for conventional radiography. Since its approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the USA, several trauma centers have incorporated this technology into their Advanced Trauma Life Support protocols. This review provides a brief overview of the system, and describes the authors' own experience with the system. METHODS: We performed a PubMed search to retrieve all references with 'Lodox' and 'Stat-scan' used as search terms. We furthermore used the google search engine to identify existing alternatives. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only FDA-approved device of its kind currently used in trauma. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The intention of our review has been to sensitize the readership that such alternative devices exist. The key message is that low dosage full body radiography may be an alternative to conventional resuscitation room radiography which is usually a prelude to CT scanning (ATLS algorithm). The combination of both is radiation intensive and therefore we consider any reduction of radiation a success. But only the future will show whether LS will survive in the face of low-dose radiation CT scanners and magnetic resonance imaging devices that may eventually completely replace conventional radiography.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Problem: Dental radiographs generally display one or more findings/diagnoses, and are linked to a unique set of patient demographics, medical history and other findings not represented by the image. However, this information is not associated with radiographs in any type of meta format, and images are not searchable based on any clinical criteria (1,2). The purpose of this pilot study is to create an online, searchable data repository of dental radiographs to be used for patient care, teaching and research. [See PDF for complete abstract]

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

A imagem digital adquirida pelo sistema da placa de fósforo foto ativada é visualizada no monitor do computador em um formato denominado DICOM. Este formato ocupa muito espaço para armazenamento, o que dificulta o arquivamento e transmissão da imagem pela Internet. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a influência da compressão JPEG, nos Fatores de Qualidade 100, 80 e 60 na reprodutibilidade da marcação de pontos cefalométricos em imagens de telerradiografias em norma lateral comparadas com o formato DICOM. A amostra consistiu de 120 imagens de telerradiografias em norma lateral obtidas a partir de 30 indivíduos, dos quais se obteve uma radiografia digital no formato DICOM. Essas imagens foram convertidas para o formato JPEG. Após o cegamento e randomização da amostra, três Ortodontistas calibrados marcaram a localização de 12 pontos cefalométricos em cada imagem utilizando o sistema de coordenadas X e Y. Esse procedimento foi repetido após 1 mês. A reprodutibilidade intra e inter observador foi calculada usando o teste de correlação intraclasse. Para comparação entre os grupos de compressão e DICOM na reprodutibilidade de marcação dos pontos utilizou se a Análise de Variância (ANOVA) a um critério para medidas repetidas. Os resultados mostraram que as marcações dos pontos cefalométricos foram bastante reprodutíveis, exceto para o ponto Órbita na coordenada X. Os diferentes formatos de arquivo mostraram estatisticamente iguais para cada ponto e eixo aferido. As compressões JPEG estudadas das imagens de telerradiografias em norma lateral não tiveram efeito na reprodutibilidade da marcação dos pontos cefalométricos testados.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

A imagem digital adquirida pelo sistema da placa de fósforo foto ativada é visualizada no monitor do computador em um formato denominado DICOM. Este formato ocupa muito espaço para armazenamento, o que dificulta o arquivamento e transmissão da imagem pela Internet. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a influência da compressão JPEG, nos Fatores de Qualidade 100, 80 e 60 na reprodutibilidade da marcação de pontos cefalométricos em imagens de telerradiografias em norma lateral comparadas com o formato DICOM. A amostra consistiu de 120 imagens de telerradiografias em norma lateral obtidas a partir de 30 indivíduos, dos quais se obteve uma radiografia digital no formato DICOM. Essas imagens foram convertidas para o formato JPEG. Após o cegamento e randomização da amostra, três Ortodontistas calibrados marcaram a localização de 12 pontos cefalométricos em cada imagem utilizando o sistema de coordenadas X e Y. Esse procedimento foi repetido após 1 mês. A reprodutibilidade intra e inter observador foi calculada usando o teste de correlação intraclasse. Para comparação entre os grupos de compressão e DICOM na reprodutibilidade de marcação dos pontos utilizou se a Análise de Variância (ANOVA) a um critério para medidas repetidas. Os resultados mostraram que as marcações dos pontos cefalométricos foram bastante reprodutíveis, exceto para o ponto Órbita na coordenada X. Os diferentes formatos de arquivo mostraram estatisticamente iguais para cada ponto e eixo aferido. As compressões JPEG estudadas das imagens de telerradiografias em norma lateral não tiveram efeito na reprodutibilidade da marcação dos pontos cefalométricos testados.