992 resultados para Classification, Library of Congress.
Resumo:
Accompanied by "Supplement. 1949-51." (19 p. 26 cm.) Published: Washington, 1952.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Vols. 686-754 comprise a supplement.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Report covers fiscal year 1977.
Resumo:
Some reports issued in the Congressional series.
Resumo:
Issued in separate vols. by classification, A through Z.
Resumo:
Includes index.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Title varies slightly.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
The paper discusses the use of online information resources for organising knowledge in library and information centres in Cochin University of Science and Technology (CUSAT). The paper discusses the status and extent of automation in CUSAT library. The use of different online resources and the purposes for which these resources are being used, is explained in detail. Structured interview method was applied for collecting data. It was observed that 67 per cent users consult online resources for assisting knowledge organisation. Library of Congress catalogue is the widely used (100 per cent) online resource followed by OPAC of CUSAT and catalogue of British Library. The main purposes for using these resources are class number building and subject indexing
Resumo:
This study explores, in 3 steps, how the 3 main library classification systems, the Library of Congress Classification, the Dewey Decimal Classification, and the Universal Decimal Classification, cover human knowledge. First, we mapped the knowledge covered by the 3 systems. We used the 10 Pillars of Knowledge: Map of Human Knowledge, which comprises 10 pillars, as an evaluative model. We mapped all the subject-based classes and subclasses that are part of the first 2 levels of the 3 hierarchical structures. Then, we zoomed into each of the 10 pillars and analyzed how the three systems cover the 10 knowledge domains. Finally, we focused on the 3 library systems. Based on the way each one of them covers the 10 knowledge domains, it is evident that they failed to adequately and systematically present contemporary human knowledge. They are unsystematic and biased, and, at the top 2 levels of the hierarchical structures, they are incomplete.