961 resultados para Astronomie -- Instruments
Resumo:
Background: Primary care physicians are often requested to assess their patients' fitness to drive. Little is however known on their needs to help them in this task. Aims: The aim of this study is to develop theories on needs, expectations, and barriers for clinical instruments helping physicians assess fitness to drive in primary care. Methods: This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews to investigate needs and expectations for instruments used to assess fitness to drive. From August 2011 to April 2013, we recorded opinions from five experts in traffic medicine, five primary care physicians, and five senior drivers. All interviews were integrally transcribed. Two independent researchers extracted, coded, and stratified categories relying on multi-grounded theory. All participants validated the final scheme. Results: Our theory suggests that for an instruments assessing fitness to drive to be implemented in primary care, it need to contribute to the decisional process. This requires at least five conditions: 1) it needs to reduce the range of uncertainty, 2) it needs to be adapted to local resources and possibilities, 3) it needs to be accepted by patients, 4) choices of tasks need to adaptable to clinical conditions, 5) and interpretation of results need to remain dependant of each patient's context. Discussion and conclusions: Most existing instruments assessing fitness to drive are not designed for primary care settings. Future instruments should also aim to support patient-centred dialogue, help anticipate driving cessation, and offer patients the opportunity to freely take their own decision on driving cessation as often as possible.
Resumo:
Cette thèse vise à apporter des éléments concrets permettant d'évaluer l'efficacité et la pertinence de la nouvelle gestion publique (NGP) dans le contexte de l'assurance-chômage en Suisse. Ancrée dans une approche des politiques publiques partant de ces dernières telles qu'elles sont mises en oeuvre plutôt que de ce qu'elles devraient être, elle s'attache à observer l'impact d'une catégorie spécifique d'instruments de gestion caractéristiques de la NGP, les instruments de redevabilité. La redevabilité désigne la nécessité ou l'obligation qu'ont des individus ou des organisations de rendre compte de leurs activités, d'en accepter la responsabilité et d'en exposer les résultats de façon transparente. À partir d'un matériau empirique constitué d'entretiens semi-directifs et d'observations participantes et non-participantes, complété par l'analyse d'un corpus documentaire varié, elle répond à cinq questions de recherche liant les agents de base, les managers qui les encadrent et les instruments gestionnaires de redevabilité. Ces questions concernent les effets réels, désirés ou non, des instruments gestionnaires encadrant la mise en oeuvre des politiques d'insertion socioprofessionnelle. Elles permettent également d'évaluer la pertinence des instruments de la NGP au regard de l'objectif général d'amélioration de la qualité du service aux usagers. En résumé, les instruments étudiés incitent les managers et les agents à la conformité (légale et budgétaire) et entraînent des conséquences inattendues limitant l'efficacité des interventions, ce qui met en question la pertinence du lien entre NGP et qualité du service rendu aux usagers. Les résultats obtenus font également ressortir l'importance d'étudier l'ensemble de la chaîne d'exécution des politiques publiques en tenant compte des interactions entre niveaux.
Resumo:
Cognitive impairment in schizophrenia and psychosis is ubiquitous and acknowledged as a core feature of clinical expression, pathophysiology, and prediction of functioning. However, assessment of cognitive functioning is excessively time-consuming in routine practice, and brief cognitive instruments specific to psychosis would be of value. Two screening tools have recently been created to address this issue, i.e., the Brief Cognitive Assessment Tool for Schizophrenia (B-CATS) and the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP). The aim of this research was to examine the comparative validity of these two brief instruments in relation to a global cognitive score. 161 patients with psychosis (96 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia and 65 patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder) and 76 healthy control subjects were tested with both instruments to examine their concurrent validity relative to a more comprehensive neuropsychological assessment battery. Scores from the B-CATS and the SCIP were highly correlated in the three diagnostic groups, and both scales showed good to excellent concurrent validity relative to a Global Cognitive Composite Score (GCCS) derived from the more comprehensive examination. The SCIP-S showed better predictive value of global cognitive impairment than the B-CATS. Partial and semi-partial correlations showed slightly higher percentages of both shared and unique variance between the SCIP-S and the GCCS than between the B-CATS and the GCCS. Brief instruments for assessing cognition in schizophrenia and bipolar disorders, such as the SCIP-S and B-CATS, seem to be reliable and promising tools for use in routine clinical practice.
Resumo:
1832 (A3,T4).
Resumo:
1833 (A4,T7).
Resumo:
1834 (A5,T8).
Resumo:
1835 (A6,T11).
Resumo:
1830 (A1,T1).
Resumo:
1832 (A3,T5).
Resumo:
1834 (A5,T9).