Riga Cathedral Exhibition of "The Architecture of Gunnar Birkerts," Riga, Latvia, 1989

[Conceptual Sketch of Floor Plan], untitled. Electrostatic print of sketch with original ink notations and signature, 11x17 inches [from photographic copy by Lance Burgharrdt]

Riga Cathedral Exhibition of "The Architecture of Gunnar Birkerts," Riga, Latvia, 1989

[Conceptual Sketch of Floor Plan], untitled. Blue ink sketch on tracing paper, 12 x 20 3/4 inches [from photographic copy by Lance Burgharrdt]

Subterranean Urban Systems Study, Graham Foundation Grant, 1971-1974

[Conceptual Sketch], untitled. Ink sketch on spiral notebook paper, 8 1/4 x 10 3/4 inches [from photographic copy by Lance Burgharrdt]

Subterranean Urban Systems Study, Graham Foundation Grant, 1971-1974

[Conceptual Sketches], untitled. Ink sketches on spiral notebook paper, 8 1/4 x 10 3/4 inches [from photographic copy by Lance Burgharrdt]

Subterranean Urban Systems Study, Graham Foundation Grant, 1971-1974

[Conceptual Sketches], untitled. Ink sketches on spiral notebook paper, 8 1/4 x 10 3/4 inches [from photographic copy by Lance Burgharrdt]

Subterranean Urban Systems Study, Graham Foundation Grant 1971-1974

[Conceptual Sketches], untitled. Digital image only of blue ink sketches on spiral notebook paper, initialed, 8 1/4 x 10 3/4 inches

Speaking in Tongues: Translating Yiddish in the 20th Century, pt. 3

Writing in Tongues examines the complexities of translating Yiddish literature at a time when the Yiddish language is in decline. After the Holocaust, Soviet repression, and American assimilation, the survival of traditional Yiddish literature depends on translation, yet a few Yiddish classics have been translated repeatedly while many others have been ignored. Anita Norich traces historical and aesthetic shifts through versions of these canonical texts, and she argues that these works and their translations form an enlightening conversation about Jewish history and identity.

Delivering demons punishing wives: False imprisonment, exoricism and other matrimonial duties in a late 20th-century manslaughter case

This article provides an analysis of R v Vollmer and Others, Australia’s most famous ‘exorcism-manslaughter’ case, in which a woman, Joan Vollmer, underwent an ‘exorcism’ performed by four people, resulting in her death. We examine how taken-for-granted distinctions were collapsed during the resulting trial - distinctions between crime and punishment, exorcism and punishment, church and state, the past and the present, law and religion, reason and unreason and between a demon and a woman. We show how the defence argument for the reality of demonic possession normalized the bizarre, while simultaneously exoticizing the mundane or ‘traditional’ criminal case involving a husband defendant and a dead wife. The apparent assumption on the part of the police and the media that this case was bizarre serves to veil the fact of its relative ordinariness. A wife is killed, and the lethal punishing violence inflicted on her body downplayed, to be reinterpreted in the legal context as somehow a consequence of something she herself precipitated. Our analysis of the Vollmer case provides a novel perspective on that always intriguing conundrum of crime and punishment.