UNTAES 1996 - 1998 - onnistunut kriisinhallintaoperaatio? : Entisen serbitasavallan liittäminen osaksi Kroatiaa YK:n pääsihteerin ja Kroatian valtion näkökulmista.

UNTAES oli YK:n kriisinhallintaoperaatio Kroatiassa vuosina 1996 1998, jonka tarkoitus oli auttaa Kroatian sodan jälkeen Kroatian valtiota ja Itä-Slavonian serbiyhteisöä Erdutin rauhansopimuksen täytäntöönpanossa, ja järjestää väliaikaishallinto Itä-Slavonian, Baranjan ja Länsi-Sirmiumin alueella siihen saakka kunnes alue, osa sodanaikaista serbitasavaltaa, olisi hallinnollisesti liitetty osaksi Kroatian valtiota. Useissa lähteissä on väitetty UNTAES-operaatiota onnistuneeksi kriisinhallintaoperaatioksi. Tämän tutkimuksen tavoite on tarkastella onnistumisväitteelle esitettyjä perusteita vertailemalla toisiinsa YK:n pääsihteerin raporteissa ja Kroatian hallituksen YK:lle osoittamissa kirjeissä esitettyjä näkökulmia operaation etenemisestä. Tutkielman teoreettinen viitekehys sisältää kriisinhallinnan käsitteen määrittelyn, konfliktin jälkeisten kehitysvaiheiden ja väliaikaishallinnon järjestämisen teoreettisen tarkastelun sekä Kroatian sodan historiallisen taustoituksen. Myös etnisten ryhmien ja monikansallisten kriisinhallintatoimijoiden kulttuurista kohtaamista käsitellään lyhyesti. Aineisto koostuu yhteensä kymmenestä YK:n pääsihteerin raportista, joista kunkin pituus on 5-18 sivua, sekä yhdestätoista Kroatian pysyvän YK-suurlähettilään välittämästä tai kirjoittamasta kirjeestä, joista kunkin pituus on liitteineen 2-40 sivua. Aineiston analyysiprossessissa on neljä eri vaihetta: aineiston luokittelu ja taulukointi, narratiivien koostaminen aineistosta, eri toimijoiden poimiminen aineistosta ja sijoittaminen A.J. Greimasin aktanttimallin kaavioon ja aktanttimallin soveltaminen ja tulkitseminen tutkimuskysymyksen näkökulmasta. Tutkimuksen pääasiallinen tulos on, että teknisesti Itä-Slavonian reintegraatiota voidaan perustellusti pitää onnistuneena, mutta UNTAES-operaation mandaattiin kirjatut operatiivisia tavoitteita laajemmat tavoitteet multietnisen yhteisön luomisesta eivät täysin toteutuneet operaation aikana. Aineiston mukaan eri toimijoiden välisessä yhteistyössä ja rauhansopimukseen täytäntöönpanossa on ollut puutteita. Pakolaisia on palannut sodan jälkeen alueelle odotuksia vähemmän, ja etnisten ryhmien väliset suhteet olivat jännitteiset operaation loputtua 1998. YK:n mandaattiin kirjatut tavoitteet multietnisen yhteiskunnan luomisesta olivat idealistisia siihen nähden että alueella asuvat serbit ja kroaatit olivat sotineet toisiaan vastaan vain joitakin kuukausia ennen UNTAES-operaation alkamista.

Osallistuminen ja läpinäkyvyys kuntatasolla : tapaustutkimus Nicaraguasta

In this Master's thesis I go through the principals of the good governance. I apply these principals to the Nicaraguan context and especially in two rural municipalities in Chontales department. I clarify the development of the space of participation in Nicaraguan municipal level. I start my examination from the period when Somoza dictatorship ended and first open elections were held, and I end it to the municipal eleccions held in November 2008. These elections were robbed in 33 municipalities and because of this there started a crisis in Nicaragua and among the actors of development cooperation. As a methods of research I use two types of interview in the thesis, the interviews for the citizens and interviews for the experts. These interviews answer to my questions of the methods of participation. I also review the level of the trust of a citizen to an authority by asking if s/he voted in the municipal eleccions in November 2008. Furthermore, I define the work of municipal government in the point of view of the citizen. I also find out if a citizen wants to take more part in the decision making in her/his municipal. I have classified the types of citizens by the interviews I made. Due to this classification I explain how many people actually have opportunity to participate the dialogue of the municipal decision making and how many can follow the activity of the municipal governance. The result is that after the elections in November 2008 only one typed group can freely take part in the dialogue. This does not apply the principals of good governance, especially in subterms of participation and transparency. The incidents after the municipal elections have affected strongly on the co-operation of Finland and Nicaragua. Because of the fault of the elections Finland like the other co-operative countries brought down the directly paid budget support. This has caused a great economical crisis in Nicaragua which the covering will take a long time. The Master's thesis is a case study of two rural municipalities called Santo Tómas and Villa Sandino. Santo Tómas has a sandinista municipal government which is not legitimate. In Villa Sandino the government is liberal and legitimate.

Asuntopolitiikka ja vieraskielisen väestön alueellinen keskittyminen Helsingissä vuosina 1992-2005

The aim of the thesis was to study the extent of spatial concentration of immigrant population in Helsinki and to analyse the impact of housing policy on ethnic residential segregation in 1992-2005. For the purpose of the study, immigrant population was defined based on the language spoken at home. The theory of residential segregation by Andersson and Molina formed the main theoretical framework for the study. According to Andersson and Molina ethnic residential segregation results from different dynamic intra-urban migration processes. Institutionally generated migration, i.e. migration patterns generated by various housing and immigrant policies and procedures, is one of the central factors in the development of ethnic segregation. The data of the study consisted of population and housing statistics and housing and immigrant policy documents of Helsinki municipality. Spatial concentration of immigrant population was studied both at district and building levels using GIS-methods and statistical methods. The housing policy of Helsinki municipality was analysed using a method created by Musterd et al. Musterd et al. categorise two types of policy approaches to residential segregation: spatial dispersion policy and compensating policy. The housing policy of Helsinki has a strong focus on social mixing and spatial dispersion of housing stock. Ethnic segregation is regarded as a threat. The importance of ethnic communities and networks is, however, acknowledged and small-scale concentration is therefore not considered harmful. Despite the spatial dispersion policy, the immigrant population is concentrated in the eastern, north-eastern and north-western suburbs of Helsinki. The spatial pattern of concentration was formed already at the beginning of the 1990's when immigration to Finland suddenly peaked. New immigrant groups were housed in the neighbourhoods where public housing was available at the time. Housing policy, namely the location of new residential areas and public housing blocks and the policies of public housing allocation were key factors influencing the residential patterns of immigrant population in the 1990's. The immigration and refugee policies of the state have also had an impact on the development. The concentration of immigrant population has continued in the same areas in the beginning of the 2000's. Dispersion to new areas has mainly taken place within the eastern and north-eastern parts of the city or in the adjacent areas. The migration patterns of native population and the reasonably rapid changes in the housing market have emerged as new factors generating and influencing the ethnic residential segregation in Helsinki in the 2000's. Due to social mixing and spatial dispersion policies, ethnic segregation in Helsinki has so far been fairly small-scale, concentrated in particular housing blocks. The number of residential buildings with a high share of immigrant population is very modest. However, the number of such buildings has doubled between 1996-2002. The concentration of immigrant population concerns mainly the public housing sector. The difference in the level of concentration between the public housing sector and privately owned housing companies is remarkable.

Koti keskellä kaupunkia : Keskusta lapsiperheen asuinalueena, esimerkkeinä Tukholma ja Helsinki

Families with children have traditionally moved to suburbs. In the last 20 years a modest counter process has however been recognized. Families with an urban lifestyle stay in the city centres. This study looks at the phenomenon through two cases, Stockholm and Helsinki. In the first case it has already been observed that the city centre has grown in popularity among families with children. Therefore it serves as a basis for the study and as well as a point of comparison. Stockholm’s city centre is expanding as new neighbourhoods have been built and are being planned. In the city centre of Helsinki the building of two large neighbourhoods for 30 000 inhabitants will start in a few years. The first aim of the study is to look closer at what has really happened in the city centre of Stockholm, why families choose to live there with their children and how the City of Stockholm has reacted to the change. The main sources of information are secondary sources, statistics and interviews with planners, politicians and experts in the field. The main object is to look at the situation in the city centre of Helsinki. Can a preference for urban residential environments be observed in Helsinki? What are the reasons for a family to choose the city centre as a living place? How does the everyday life of a family in the city centre appear? How are these families taken into account in the planning of the city? The main sources of information here are statistics, interviews with dwellers in the neighbourhood Kruununhaka and interviews with planners. In Stockholm the birth rate has grown constantly during the 2000s and is highest in the city centre. Some of the families still move elsewhere, but many of them do not. One of the most important reasons for living in the city centre is short working distances which give working parents more time with their children. Another reason is a preference of an urban, active lifestyle. Families prefer to live close to everything, childcare, schools, shops and entertainments. The popularity of the city centre among families with children has taken politicians and planners by surprise. Helsinki has not experienced a baby boom like Stockholm. However the negative changes in the birth rate have been more modest in the central areas than in the suburbs. Statistics show, that many families move away from the city centre as the children grow. Families who stay in the city centre especially appreciate closeness to public and private services and good public transportation which means that they are not dependent on using the car. Further they find that the city centre has a tolerant climate and is a safe and beautiful place to live in. The families enjoy the social life of the neighbourhood and feel that it makes a good climate to raise children in. However they are concerned with traffic safety and the lack of stimulus in the playgrounds of the neighbourhood parks. Two large neighbourhoods with homes for about 30 000 inhabitants are now planned in the former Port Districts in the city centre of Helsinki. The other one, Jätkäsaari has been planned to become an attractive alternative for families with children. Traffic safety has been one of the main objects for the planning. The other, Kalasatama, has been planned to attract all groups in society.