Cooperative Research Program

Many of the Missing Numbers In This Set Have Been Cataloged Separately and May Be Found In This Catalog under the Author's Name. for Further Information Consult Education-Psychology Library

Studies of the Cooperative Project.

No more published?

Department of Energy National Laboratory Cooperative Research Initiatives Act : hearings before the Subcommittee on Energy Research and Development of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, One Hundredth Congress, first session on S. 1480 ... September 15 and 17, 1987.

Shipping list no.: 88-374-P (pt. 1).

Annual Administration Report on the Working of Cooperative Societies

Title Varies: Annual Report on the Working of the Cooperative Societies

Cooperative economic insect report.

Some issues have supplement: Cooperative economic insect report. Special report.

The Impact of a Group Health Cooperative HPV Vaccination Promotion Program on Initiation of the HPV Vaccine

Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016-06

Structuring cooperative group work in classrooms

Cooperative, small-group learning is widely recognised as a pedagogical practice that promotes learning and socialisation across a range of curriculum areas from primary school through to high school and college. When children work cooperatively together, they learn to give and receive help, share their ideas and listen to other students’ perspectives, seek new ways of clarifying differences, resolving problems, and constructing new understandings and knowledge. The result is that students attain higher academic outcomes and are more motivated to achieve than they would be if they worked alone. This paper provides an overview of five different studies that the author has conducted that demonstrate clearly the importance of explicitly structuring cooperative small-group work in classrooms if children are to derive the benefits widely attributed to this pedagogical practice.

The template: A cooperative approach to evaluating community rehabilitation services

This article describes a workshop and consultation process utilized by four community rehabilitation services and other stakeholders. This process led to the development of an evaluation Template upon which to plan a service evaluation. The Template comprises a number of guiding questions within three broad domains. These are, the people domain (pertaining to the client, their disability, their family and service context), the program domain (pertaining to the service and its activities), and the perspective domain (pertaining to the broader social and community context). It is suggested that the Template, the process by which it was developed, and the guidelines for its use will have relevance to rehabilitation managers, administrators, and others involved in evaluation of community rehabilitation services.