New Insights in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Heart Failure.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality in the US and in westernized countries with ischemic heart disease accounting for the majority of these deaths. Paradoxically, the improvements in the medical and surgical treatments of acute coronary syndrome are leading to an increasing number of "survivors" who are then developing heart failure. Despite considerable advances in its management, the gold standard for the treatment of end-stage heart failure patients remains heart transplantation. Nevertheless, this procedure can be offered only to a small percentage of patients who could benefit from a new heart due to the limited availability of donor organs. The aim of this review is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of innovative approaches in the diagnosis and treatment of patients refractory to standard medical therapy and excluded from cardiac transplantation lists.

Are Newer AEDs Better Than the Classic Ones in the Treatment of Status Epilepticus?

Several newer antiepileptic drugs have been increasingly used in patients with status epilepticus, especially levetiracetam and lacosamide, because of their intravenous availability. They may offer advantages in terms of tolerability; however, to date, no clear evidence suggests any advantage regarding efficacy after the use of newer antiepileptic drugs in this specific clinical setting. However, there has been a considerable revival of interest regarding some classic compounds, such as midazolam (MDZ), valproate (VPA), ketamine, or ketogenic diet. Awaiting comparative studies, which in part are ongoing, it seems reasonable, for the first choice, to rely on those agents that are best known and less expensive.

Monotherapy or Polytherapy for First-Line Treatment of SE?

Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the most frequent neurologic emergencies, and a rapid and effective treatment is warranted. Current guidelines recommend a stepwise approach using a sequence of different antiepileptic drugs with benzodiazepines (BZD) being the first treatment proposed. To provide the more effective treatment as soon as possible, some authors have suggested using a combined polytherapy as first-line treatment. Strong evidence supports the use of benzodiazepines, mostly lorazepam and midazolam as initial monotherapy treatment for SE. Insufficient data are available to support the use of nonsedating antiepileptic drugs as phenytoin, valproic acid, or levetiracetam without a previous benzodiazepine administration. Studies assessing the role of a combined initial therapy are rare, if not missing. Moreover, owing the wide range of SE etiologies, a "one fits all" initial polytherapy seems difficult to achieve. After reviewing the available evidence, guidelines, and current practices regarding monotherapy and polytherapy as first-line treatment in SE in adults, the authors propose a rational algorithm for early antiseizure treatment in SE.

Rôle de la chirurgie laparoscopique dans le traitement de la maladie de reflux gastro-oesophagien [Laparoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease]

Un certain nombre de malades ne sont toujours pas soulagés de manière satisfaisante par le traitement médical de la maladie de de reflux gastro-oesophagien (MR). Ce travail rapport notre expérience de 55 malades ayant bénéficié d'un montage anti-reflux réalisé par laparoscopie entre février 1992 et février 1997. La durée opératoire moyenne a été de 181 minutes, et tend à diminuer. La médiane de s&jour postopératoire a été de 4 jours. Quatre-vingt-neuf pour-cent des malades ont eu un suivi complet de 2 à 62 mois. Nonante-deux pour-cent d'entre eux étaient satisfaits ou très satisfaits du résultat. L'enthousiasme lié au traitement laparoscopique de la MR est justifié. Les résultats dépendent de la maîtrise technique du chirurgien, de sa connaissance de la MR, et de ses capacités à adapter le type de montage anti-reflux en fonction de l'évaluation préopératoire. L'intervention donne alors un résultat prévisible, ce qui incite à la proposer aux malades mal contrôlés médicalement, ou qui préfèrent éviter les contraintes d'un traitement de maintien à long terme.

Identification of new transformation products during enzymatic treatment of tetracycline and erythromycin antibiotics at laboratory scale by an on-line turbulent flow liquid-chromatography coupled to a high resolution mass spectrometer LTQ-Orbitrap

This work describes the formation of transformation products (TPs) by the enzymatic degradation at laboratory scale of two highly consumed antibiotics: tetracycline (Tc) and erythromycin (ERY). The analysis of the samples was carried out by a fast and simple method based on the novel configuration of the on-line turbulent flow system coupled to a hybrid linear ion trap – high resolution mass spectrometer. The method was optimized and validated for the complete analysis of ERY, Tc and their transformation products within 10 min without any other sample manipulation. Furthermore, the applicability of the on-line procedure was evaluated for 25 additional antibiotics, covering a wide range of chemical classes in different environmental waters with satisfactory quality parameters. Degradation rates obtained for Tc by laccase enzyme and ERY by EreB esterase enzyme without the presence of mediators were ∼78% and ∼50%, respectively. Concerning the identification of TPs, three suspected compounds for Tc and five of ERY have been proposed. In the case of Tc, the tentative molecular formulas with errors mass within 2 ppm have been based on the hypothesis of dehydroxylation, (bi)demethylation and oxidation of the rings A and C as major reactions. In contrast, the major TP detected for ERY has been identified as the “dehydration ERY-A”, with the same molecular formula of its parent compound. In addition, the evaluation of the antibiotic activity of the samples along the enzymatic treatments showed a decrease around 100% in both cases

"Hit the primary": A paradigm shift in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer?

Patients with metastatic prostate cancer (PC) represent a heterogeneous group with survival rates varying between 13 and 75 months. The current standard treatment in this setting is hormonal therapy, with or without docetaxel-based chemotherapy. In the era of individualized medicine, however, maximizing treatment options, especially in long-term surviving patients with limited disease burden, is of capital importance. Emerging data, mainly from retrospective surgical series, show survival benefits in men diagnosed with metastatic PC following definitive therapy for the prostate. Whether the irradiation of primary tumor in a metastatic disease might improve the therapeutic ratio in association with systemic treatments remains investigational. In this scenario, modern radiation therapy (RT) can play a significant role owing to its intrinsic capability to act as a more general immune response modifier, as well as to the potentially better toxicity profile compared to surgery. Preclinical data, clinical experience, and challenges in local treatment in de novo metastatic PC are reviewed and discussed.

Fondaparinux in the initial and long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: Even in the absence of evidence on its long-term efficacy and safety, a number of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) receive long-term therapy with fondaparinux alone in everyday practice. METHODS: We used the Registro Informatizado de Enfermedad Tromboembólica (RIETE) registry to compare the rate of VTE recurrences and major bleeding at 10 and 90 days in patients with and without cancer. For long-term therapy, fondaparinux was compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in patients without cancer and with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in those with cancer. RESULTS: Of 47,378 patients recruited, 46,513 were initially treated with heparin, 865 with fondaparinux. Then, 263 patients (78 with cancer) were treated for at least 3 months with fondaparinux. After propensity-score matching, there were no differences between patients receiving initial therapy with heparin or fondaparinux. Among patients with cancer, there were no differences between fondaparinux and LMWH. Among patients without cancer, the long-term use of fondaparinux was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (3.24 % vs. 0.95 %, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: An unexpected high rate of major bleeding was observed in non-cancer patients treated with long-term fondaparinux. Our small sample does not allow to derive relevant conclusions on the use of fondaparinux in cancer patients.