996 resultados para Primary neoplasms
Resumo:
IntroductionLe lymphome primaire de l'os (LPO) représente moins de 1% de tous les lymphomes malins. Dans cette étude, nous avons évalué le profil de la maladie, les résultats thérapeutiques, et les facteurs pronostiques d'une série consécutive de patients atteints de LPO de stade I et II. Matériel et méthodeDans treize institutions du Réseau des Cancers Rares (Rare Cancer Network), 116 patients ont été traités pour un LPO entre 1987 et 2008, et sont l'objet de cette étude rétrospective. Quatre-vingt-sept patients ont subi une chimioradiothérapie (CXRT) sans (78), ou avec (9) une chirurgie, 15 ont bénéficié de radiothérapie (RT) sans (13), ou avec (2) chirurgie, 14 d'une chimiothérapie (CXT) sans (9), ou avec (5) chirurgie. La dose médiane de RT était de 40 Gy (4-60). Le nombre médian de cycles de CXT était de 6 (2-8). Le suivi médian était de 41 mois (6-242). RésultatsLe taux de réponse global à la fin du traitement était de 91% (74% de réponses complètes et 17% de réponses partielles). Une récidive locale ou une progression ont été observées chez 12 (10%) patients et une récidive systémique chez 17 (15%) patients. La survie globale, la survie spécifique, et le contrôle local à 5 ans ont été de 76%, 78% et 92%, respectivement. En analyse univariée (log-rank test), les facteurs pronostiques favorables pour la survie globale et la survie spécifique étaient: un indice pronostique international (IPI) inférieur ou égale à 1 (P = 0.009), un grade histologique élevé (P = 0.04), une CXRT (P = 0.05), une CXT (P = 0.0004), une réponse complète (P <0.0001), et une dose de supérieure à 40 Gy (p = 0.005). Concernant le contrôle local, seules la rémission complète et stade I ont été des facteurs favorables. En analyse multivariée, le score IPI, la dose de RT, la rémission complète, et la CXT ont influencé le résultat de façon indépendante en ce qui concerne la survie globale et la survie spécifique. La rémission complète a été le seul facteur prédictif pour le contrôle local. ConclusionCette étude multicentrique rétrospective confirme le bon pronostic du LPO de stade précoce traité par une combinaison de chimio-radiothérapie. Une dose de suffisant de radiothérapie et un nombre adéquat de cycles de chimiothérapie ont été suivis des résultats les plus favorables.
Resumo:
BACKGROUND: Measurement of plasma renin activity (PRA) is the gold standard for monitoring mineralocorticoid treatment in humans with primary hypoadrenocorticism (PH). OBJECTIVES: To compare PRA in dogs with newly diagnosed PH, dogs with diseases mimicking PH, and healthy dogs, and evaluate measurement of PRA to monitor therapeutic effects in dogs with PH treated with different mineralocorticoids. ANIMALS: Eleven dogs with newly diagnosed PH (group 1), 10 dogs with diseases mimicking PH (group 2), 21 healthy dogs (group 3), 17 dogs with treated PH (group 4). METHODS: In group 1, PRA was measured before treatment and at different times after initiating treatment. In groups 2 and 3, PRA was measured at initial presentation only. In group 4, no baseline PRA was obtained but PRA was measured once or every 1-6 months during treatment. Mineralocorticoid treatment consisted of fludrocortisone acetate (FC) or desoxycorticosterone pivalate (DOCP). RESULTS: Plasma renin activity before treatment was increased in dogs with PH compared to normal dogs and dogs with diseases mimicking PH with median activity of 27, 0.8, and 1.0 ng/mL/h, respectively. In dogs with PH, PRA decreased and normalized with mineralocorticoid treatment using DOCP but not with FC. In dogs treated with DOCP, PRA was lower than in dogs treated with FC. Plasma sodium concentrations were higher and potassium concentrations were lower with DOCP treatment compared to FC treatment. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Plasma renin activity is a reliable tool for monitoring mineralocorticoid treatment. DOCP treatment more effectively suppresses PRA compared to FC in dogs with PH.
Resumo:
Abstract: Background Stoma closure has been associated with a high rate of surgical site infection (SSI) and the ideal stoma-site skin closure technique is still debated. The aim of this study was to compare the rate of SSI following primary skin closure (PC) versus a skin-approximating, subcuticular purse-string closure (APS). Methods All consecutive patients undergoing stoma closure between 2002 and 2007 by two surgeons at a single tertiary-care institution were retrospectively assessed. Patients who had a new stoma created at the same site or those without wound closure were excluded. The end point was SSI, determined according to current CDC guidelines, at the stoma closure site and/or the midline laparotomy incision. Results There were 61 patients in the PC group (surgeon A: 58 of 61) and 17 in the APS group (surgeon B: 16 of 17). The two groups were similar in baseline and intraoperative characteristics, except that patients in the PC group were more often diagnosed with benign disease (p = 0.0156) and more often had a stapled anastomosis (p = 0.002). The overall SSI rate was 14 of 78 (18%). All SSIs occurred in the PC group (14 of 61 vs. 0 of 17, p = 0.03). Conclusions Our study suggests that a skin-approximating closure with a subcuticular purse-string of the stoma site leads to less SSI than a primary closure. Randomized studies are needed to confirm our findings and assess additional end points such as healing time, cost, and patient satisfaction.
Resumo:
Although the performance of the Swiss health system is high, one out of ten patients in general practitioner's (GP) office declares having foregone care in the previous twelve months for economic reasons. Reasons for foregoing care are several and include a lack of knowledge of existing social aids in getting health insurance, unavailability of GPs and long waiting lists for various types of care. Although long term knowledge of patients or a psychosocial history of deprivation or poverty may help identify individuals at risk of foregoing care, many may remain undetected. We propose then a few instruments to help GPs to identify, in a simple and structured approach, patients at risk of forgoing care for economic reasons; these patients are frequently deprived and sometimes poor.
Resumo:
BACKGROUND: Intravenously administered antimicrobial agents have been the standard choice for the empirical management of fever in patients with cancer and granulocytopenia. If orally administered empirical therapy is as effective as intravenous therapy, it would offer advantages such as improved quality of life and lower cost. METHODS: In a prospective, open-label, multicenter trial, we randomly assigned febrile patients with cancer who had granulocytopenia that was expected to resolve within 10 days to receive empirical therapy with either oral ciprofloxacin (750 mg twice daily) plus amoxicillin-clavulanate (625 mg three times daily) or standard daily doses of intravenous ceftriaxone plus amikacin. All patients were hospitalized until their fever resolved. The primary objective of the study was to determine whether there was equivalence between the regimens, defined as an absolute difference in the rates of success of 10 percent or less. RESULTS: Equivalence was demonstrated at the second interim analysis, and the trial was terminated after the enrollment of 353 patients. In the analysis of the 312 patients who were treated according to the protocol and who could be evaluated, treatment was successful in 86 percent of the patients in the oral-therapy group (95 percent confidence interval, 80 to 91 percent) and 84 percent of those in the intravenous-therapy group (95 percent confidence interval, 78 to 90 percent; P=0.02). The results were similar in the intention-to-treat analysis (80 percent and 77 percent, respectively; P=0.03), as were the duration of fever, the time to a change in the regimen, the reasons for such a change, the duration of therapy, and survival. The types of adverse events differed slightly between the groups but were similar in frequency. CONCLUSIONS: In low-risk patients with cancer who have fever and granulocytopenia, oral therapy with ciprofloxacin plus amoxicillin-clavulanate is as effective as intravenous therapy.