Functional multidisciplinary rehabilitation versus outpatient physiotherapy for non specific low back pain: randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: In recent decades the treatment of non-specific low back pain has turned to active modalities, some of which were based on cognitive-behavioural principles. Non-randomised studies clearly favour functional multidisciplinary rehabilitation over outpatient physiotherapy. However, systematic reviews and meta-analysis provide contradictory evidence regarding the effects on return to work and functional status. The aim of the present randomised study was to compare long-term functional and work status after 3-week functional multidisciplinary rehabilitation or 18 supervised outpatient physiotherapy sessions. METHODS: 109 patients with non-specific low back pain were randomised to either a 3-week functional multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme, including physical and ergonomic training, psychological pain management, back school and information, or 18 sessions of active outpatient physiotherapy over 9 weeks. Primary outcomes were functional disability (Oswestry) and work status. Secondary outcomes were lifting capacity (Spinal Function Sort and PILE test), lumbar range-of-motion (modified-modified Schöber and fingertip-to-floor tests), trunk muscle endurance (Shirado and Biering-Sörensen tests) and aerobic capacity (modified Bruce test). RESULTS: Oswestry disability index was improved to a significantly greater extent after functional multidisciplinary rehabilitation compared to outpatient physiotherapy at follow-up of 9 weeks (P = 0.012), 9 months (P = 0.023) and 12 months (P = 0.011). Work status was significantly improved after functional multidisciplinary rehabilitation only (P = 0.012), resulting in a significant difference compared to outpatient physiotherapy at 12 months' follow-up (P = 0.012). Secondary outcome results were more contrasted. CONCLUSIONS: Functional multidisciplinary rehabilitation was better than outpatient physiotherapy in improving functional and work status. From an economic point of view, these results should be backed up by a cost-effectiveness study.

Imagerie cardiaque non invasive: apport spécifique en clinique des nouvelles modalités (I). Evaluation morphologique [Cardiac imaging: specific clinical role of newly developed non invasive techniques. Part 1: Morphological evaluation].

Echocardiography is the preferred initial test to assess cardiac morphology and ventricular function. Cardiac MRI enables an optimal visualisation of heart muscle without contrast injection, and precise measurement of the ventricular volumes and systolic function. It is therefore an ideal test for patients with poor echocardiographic windows or for the specific evaluation of right heart chambers. Heart CT also remarkably images heart muscle and precisely measures ventricular systolic function after intravenous injection of iodinated contrast. Coronary CT may also, in selected cases, avoid the need for diagnostic coronary angiography. Although very accurate, these imaging modalities are expensive and may be contra-indicated for a particular patient. Their use in clinical practice has to follow the accepted guidelines.

Successful surgical resection in non-lesional operculo-insular epilepsy without intracranial monitoring.

Pre-operative assessment and surgical management of patients with non-lesional extratemporal epilepsy remain challenging due to a lack of precise localisation of the epileptic zone. In most cases, invasive recording with depth or subdural electrodes is required. Here, we describe the case of 6.5-year-old girl who underwent comprehensive non-invasive phase I video-EEG investigation for drug-resistant epilepsy, including electric source and nuclear imaging. Left operculo-insular epilepsy was diagnosed. Post-operatively, she developed aphasia which resolved within one year, corroborating the notion of enhanced language plasticity in children. The patient remained seizure-free for more than three years.

Non-remboursement de la fécondation in vitro : il est temps de changer d'avis

La fécondation in vitro (FIV) n'est pas remboursée. Le Tribunal fédéral le répète inlassablement depuis bientôt 30 ans. Néanmoins, les assurées ne baissent pas les bras et périodiquement resoumettent la question, espérant que de nouvelles données scientifiques sauront infléchir la Haute Cour. En vain. Le tribunal l'a redit en octobre 2012:1 cette prestation n'est pas à charge des caisses.2 L'ordonnance sur les prestations de l'assurance-maladie (OPAS3) le prévoit explicitement, et il n'y a simplement pas lieu d'examiner une disposition d'une ordonnance du Département fédéral de l'intérieur (DFI). Le raisonnement est toutefois un peu court. Premièrement, le refus du Tribunal fédéral d'examiner si l'ordonnance respecte le cadre de la délégation législative ne convainc pas. Deuxièmement, la FIV remplit les critères imposés à la prise en charge tels que décidés par le législateur dans la loi sur l'assurance-maladie (LAMal4). Enfin, les assurés qui décident de recourir contre un refus de remboursement sont privés des garanties minimales de procédure que leur garantit pourtant la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme. La présente contribution commence par une brève description de la FIV. Elle expose ensuite la législation applicable (partie 2) et la jurisprudence fédérale qui en découle (partie 3). La partie suivante critique la position du Tribunal fédéral au regard des principes énoncés dans la législation. Une comparaison avec l'insémination intra-utérine (IIU), pour laquelle le Tribunal fédéral a admis le remboursement, met en lumière les incohérences de la jurisprudence. La compatibilité de la jurisprudence fédérale avec l'art. 6 de la Convention européenne sur les droits de l'homme est évaluée. La conclusion plaide pour une réforme partielle du système procédural gouvernant la prise en charge des prestations de soins, mais aussi des techniques médicales alternatives.

Intérêt de l'angiographie numérisée au vert d'indocyanine dans le diagnostic différentiel des tumeurs non pigmentées de la choroïde [Value of indocyanine green videoangiography in differential diagnosis of nonpigmented tumors of the choroid]

BACKGROUND: Indocyanine green video-angiography (ICG) is a recent examination technique, its possibilities and limitations as far as intraocular tumours are concerned, haven't been fully explored yet. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have studied 50 cases of non-pigmented choroidal tumours, including 14 cases of choroidal hemangioma's, 11 cases of posterior uveal metastases and 25 cases of non-pigmented melanoma's. RESULTS: Characteristic images were obtained when examining choroidal hemangioma's and, until a certain point, posterior choroidal metastases. Non pigmented melanoma's on the contrary, presented a great variety of different indocyanine green angiographic pictures. CONCLUSION: Indocyanine green video-angiography (ICG) has a definite value in the differential diagnosis of non-pigmented posterior choroidal tumours.