Enrichment of lanthanides in aragonite

Using the constant addition technique, the coprecipitation of lanthanum, gadolinium, and lutetium with aragonite in seawater was experimentally investigated at 25 degrees C. Their concentrations in aragonite overgrowths were determined by inductive coupled plasma mass spectrometer. All these lanthanides were strongly enriched in aragonite overgrowths. The amount of lanthanum, gadolinium, and lutetium incorporated into aragonite accounted for 57%-99%, 50%-89%, and 40%-91% of their initial total amount, respectively. With the increase of aragonite precipitation rate, more lanthanides were incorporated into aragonite while their relative fraction in aragonite overgrowths decreased consistently. It indicated that the coprecipitation of lanthanides with aragonite was controlled by the kinetics of aragonite precipitation.

Epoxidation of styrene with NaOCl and catalyzed by nickel(II) complexes

Epoxidation of styrene was catalyzed by some nickel(II) complexes, with NaOCl as the oxygen donor. The catalyst Ni(PA)(2). 2H(2)O has been found to be stable for the epoxidation of styrene. Some additives were introduced in the reaction to improve the "micro-environment" of the catalyst. Radical trap had little influence on styrene epoxidation. It was interesting to find that phase-transfer agent had negative influence on epoxidation in this biphase reaction. A possible mechanism of styrene epoxidation catalyzed by Ni(PA)(2). 2H(2)O has been proposed.

Heterogeneous enantioselective epoxidation catalyzed by Mn(salen) complexes grafted onto mesoporous materials by phenoxy group

Three chiral Mn(salen) complexes were immobilized into different mesoporous material via phenoxy group by a simplified method and they show high activity and enantioselectivity for asymmetric epoxidation of various substituted unfunctional olefins. The heterogeneous Mn(salen) catalysts show comparable ee values for asymmetric epoxidation of styrene and 6-cyano-2,2-dimethylchromene and much higher ee values for epoxidation of a-methylstyrene (heterogeneous 79.7% ee versus homogeneous 26.4% ee) and cis-beta-methylstyrene (heterogeneous 94.9% ee versus homogeneous 25.3% ee for cis-epoxide) than the homogeneous catalysts. These heterogeneous catalysts also remarkably alter the cis/trans ratio of epoxides for asymmetric epoxidation of cis-beta-methylstyrene (heterogeneous 21 versus homogeneous 0.38). The axial tether group does not make a big effect on ee values and the increase in ee value and change in cis/trans ratio are mainly attributed to the axial immobilization mode and the support effect of heterogeneous catalysts. The catalysts keep constant ee values for the recycle tests of eight times for asymmetric epoxidation of a-methylstyrene. And several possibilities were proposed to elucidate the difference in ee values of heterogeneous catalysts from homogeneous catalysts. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.