Alteração precoce da matriz extracelular e parâmetros diastólicos na síndrome metabólica

FUNDAMENTOS: Síndrome Metabólica (SM) está associada com maior risco cardiovascular, porém não está claro se as alterações miocárdicas presentes nessa condição, como a disfunção diastólica, são consequência de mecanismos sistêmicos ou de efeitos diretos no miocárdio. OBJETIVOS: Comparar função diastólica, biomarcadores de atividade da Matriz Extracelular (MEC), inflamação e estresse hemodinâmico, em pacientes com SM e controles saudáveis. MÉTODOS: Pacientes com SM (n = 76) e controles saudáveis (n = 30) foram avaliados clinicamente e submetidos a exame ecocardiográfico e mensuração dos níveis plasmáticos de metaloproteinase-9 (MMP9), inibidor tecidual da metaloproteinase-1 (TIMP1), proteína C reativa ultrassensível (PCR-us), resistência insulínica (HOMA-RI) e NT-proBNP. RESULTADOS: O grupo SM apresentou menor onda E' (10,1 ± 3,0 cm/s vs. 11,9 ± 2,6 cm/s, p = 0,005), maiores valores para onda A (63,4 ± 14,1 vs. 53,1 ± 8,9 cm/s, p < 0,001), razão E/E'(8,0 ± 2,2 vs. 6,3 ± 1,2; p < 0,001), MMP9 (502,9 ± 237,1 vs. 330,4 ± 162,7 ng/mL, p < 0,001), PCR-us (p = 0,001) e HOMA-RI (p < 0,001), sem diferença nos níveis de TIMP1 e NT-proBNP. Na análise multivariada, apenas MMP9 foi independentemente associada a SM. CONCLUSÃO: Pacientes com SM apresentaram diferenças em medidas ecocardiográficas de função diastólica, na atividade da MEC, PCR-us e HOMA-RI em relação aos controles. Porém, somente MMP9 foi independentemente associada com SM. Esses achados sugerem que os efeitos precoces da SM sobre a atividade da MEC podem não ser detectados nas medidas ecocardiográficas de função diastólica usuais.

Dynamic presentations for illustration purposes

Dynamics, presentation, illustration, computer graphics, temporal modelling, non-photorealistic rendering

Cost-Effectiveness of High, Moderate and Low-Dose Statins in the Prevention of Vascular Events in the Brazilian Public Health System

Background:Statins have proven efficacy in the reduction of cardiovascular events, but the financial impact of its widespread use can be substantial.Objective:To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of three statin dosing schemes in the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS) perspective.Methods:We developed a Markov model to evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of low, intermediate and high intensity dose regimens in secondary and four primary scenarios (5%, 10%, 15% and 20% ten-year risk) of prevention of cardiovascular events. Regimens with expected low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction below 30% (e.g. simvastatin 10mg) were considered as low dose; between 30-40%, (atorvastatin 10mg, simvastatin 40mg), intermediate dose; and above 40% (atorvastatin 20-80mg, rosuvastatin 20mg), high-dose statins. Effectiveness data were obtained from a systematic review with 136,000 patients. National data were used to estimate utilities and costs (expressed as International Dollars - Int$). A willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold equal to the Brazilian gross domestic product per capita (circa Int$11,770) was applied.Results:Low dose was dominated by extension in the primary prevention scenarios. In the five scenarios, the ICER of intermediate dose was below Int$10,000 per QALY. The ICER of the high versus intermediate dose comparison was above Int$27,000 per QALY in all scenarios. In the cost-effectiveness acceptability curves, intermediate dose had a probability above 50% of being cost-effective with ICERs between Int$ 9,000-20,000 per QALY in all scenarios.Conclusions:Considering a reasonable WTP threshold, intermediate dose statin therapy is economically attractive, and should be a priority intervention in prevention of cardiovascular events in Brazil.

Reproducibility of Left Ventricular Mass by Echocardiogram in the ELSA-Brasil

Background: Echocardiography, though non-invasive and having relatively low-cost, presents issues of variability which can limit its use in epidemiological studies. Objective: To evaluate left ventricular mass reproducibility when assessed at acquisition (online) compared to when assessed at a reading center after electronic transmission (offline) and also when assessed by different readers at the reading center. Methods: Echocardiographers from the 6 ELSA-Brasil study investigation centers measured the left ventricular mass online during the acquisition from 124 studies before transmitting to the reading center, where studies were read according to the study protocol. Half of these studies were blindly read by a second reader in the reading center. Results: From the 124 echocardiograms, 5 (4%) were considered not measurable. Among the remaining 119, 72 (61%) were women, mean age was 50.2 ± 7.0 years and 2 had structural myocardial abnormalities. Images were considered to be optimal/ good by the reading center for 110 (92.4%) cases. No significant difference existed between online and offline measurements (1,29 g, CI 95% −3.60-6.19), and the intraclass correlation coefficient between them was 0.79 (CI 95% 0.71-0.85). For images read by two readers, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.86 (CI 95% 0.78-0.91). Conclusion: There were no significant drifts between online and offline left ventricular mass measurements, and reproducibility was similar to that described in previous studies. Central quantitative assessment of echocardiographic studies in reading centers, as performed in the ELSA-Brasil study, is feasible and useful in clinical and epidemiological studies performed in our setting.