Thyroid function in severely traumatized patients with or without head injury.

The pattern of thyroid function changes following severe trauma was assessed prospectively in 35 patients during the first 5 days after injury. Patients were divided into 2 groups to evaluate the effect of head injury: group I, patients with severe head injury; group II, patients with multiple injuries without head injury. The results demonstrate a low T3 and low T4 syndrome throughout the study, with decreases in both total and free levels of T3 and T4, normal or increased rT3 levels, and normal TSH levels. The presence of severe head injury was associated with lower levels of TSH and free T3. Mortality was 37%. Survival was associated with higher TSH and T3 levels, but not with higher T4 levels. TSH levels exceeding 1 mU/l on the first day were only observed in survivors. These findings show that a typical low T3 and low T4 syndrome is present after severe trauma in patients with multiple injury as well as with head injury. Primary hypothyroidism can be excluded, pituitary or hypothalamic hypothyroidism is likely in these patients.

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Spinal Function Sort (SFS) for French- and German-Speaking Patients with Back Complaints

Aim: Functional subjective evaluation through questionnaire is fundamental, but not often realized in patients with back complaints, notably because of lack of validated tools, in accordance with recognized psychometric criteria. The Spinal Function Sort (SFS), developed according to actual standards, was only validated in English. The aim of this study is to translate, adapt and validate the French and German version of the SFS.Method and material: The translation and cross-cultural adaptation were performed following the methodology proposed by the American Association of Orthopedist Surgeon. A total of 344 patients, presenting varied back complaints (especially degenerative and traumatic), took part in this study in a tertiary French- (n=87; mean age 44y; 17 women) and German-speaking (n=257; mean age 41y; 53 women) center. Test-retest reliability was quantified using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and construct validity was assessed by estimating the Pearson's correlation with the SF-36 physical and mental scales, the Visual Analogue Scale for Pain Intensity (VAS), and subscales of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).Results: Respectively for the French and German version, ICC were 0.98 and 0.94. Correlations 0.63 and 0.67 with the SF-36 Physical Functioning subscale; 0.60 and 0.52 with the SF-36 Physical Summary Scale ; -0.33 and -0.51 with the VAS ; -0.08 and 0.25 with the SF-36 Mental Health scale; 0.01 and 0.28 with the SF-36 Mental Summary Scale; -0.26 and -0.42 with the HADS depression; -0.17 and -0.45 with the HADS anxiety.Discussion: For both the French and German version of the SFS, the reliability was excellent. Convergent construct validity with SF-36 physical scales is good, moderated with the VAS. We find out a low correlation with SF-36 mental scales (divergent construct validity). We find out a low correlation with HADS subscales in the French version, and a moderate one in the German version. Selection bias, chronicity of the complaints, as well as cultural differences could explain these results. In conclusion, both the French and German version of the SFS are valid and reliable for evaluation of perceived functional capacity for patients with back complaints.