FRAX(®) Bone Mineral Density Task Force of the 2010 Joint International Society for Clinical Densitometry International Osteoporosis Foundation Position Development Conference.

FRAX(®) is a fracture risk assessment algorithm developed by the World Health Organization in cooperation with other medical organizations and societies. Using easily available clinical information and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), when available, FRAX(®) is used to predict the 10-year probability of hip fracture and major osteoporotic fracture. These values may be included in country specific guidelines to aid clinicians in determining when fracture risk is sufficiently high that the patient is likely to benefit from pharmacological therapy to reduce that risk. Since the introduction of FRAX(®) into clinical practice, many practical clinical questions have arisen regarding its use. To address such questions, the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) and International Osteoporosis Foundations (IOF) assigned task forces to review the best available medical evidence and make recommendations for optimal use of FRAX(®) in clinical practice. Questions were identified and divided into three general categories. A task force was assigned to investigating the medical evidence in each category and developing clinically useful recommendations. The BMD Task Force addressed issues that included the potential use of skeletal sites other than the femoral neck, the use of technologies other than DXA, and the deletion or addition of clinical data for FRAX(®) input. The evidence and recommendations were presented to a panel of experts at the ISCD-IOF FRAX(®) Position Development Conference, resulting in the development of ISCD-IOF Official Positions addressing FRAX(®)-related issues.

The anti-apoptotic role of PPARbeta contributes to efficient skin wound healing.

PPARalpha and PPARbeta are expressed in the mouse epidermis during fetal development, but their expression progressively disappears after birth. However, the expression of PPARbeta is reactivated in adult mice upon proliferative stimuli, such as cutaneous injury. We show here that PPARbeta protects keratinocytes from growth factor deprivation, anoikis and TNF-alpha-induced apoptosis, by modulating both early and late apoptotic events via the Akt1 signaling pathway and DNA fragmentation, respectively. The control mechanisms involve direct transcriptional upregulation of ILK, PDK1, and ICAD-L. In accordance with the anti-apoptotic role of PPARbeta observed in vitro, the balance between proliferation and apoptosis is altered in the epidermis of wounded PPARbeta mutant mice, with increased keratinocyte proliferation and apoptosis. In addition, primary keratinocytes deleted for PPARbeta show defects in both cell-matrix and cell-cell contacts, and impaired cell migration. Together, these results suggest that the delayed wound closure observed in PPARbeta mutant mice involves the alteration of several key processes. Finally, comparison of PPARbeta and Akt1 knock-out mice reveals many similarities, and suggests that the ability of PPARbeta to modulate the Akt1 pathway has significant impact during skin wound healing.

R6le de l'urotlogue dans le dépistage des maladies osseuses [Role of the urologist in the screening of bone diseases].

During their lifetime, 20% of men will suffer from a fracture secondary to osteoporosis, and morbidity and mortality of a hip fracture in men are more severe than in women. Despite these facts, there are only few studies on osteoporosis in men. Hyopgonadism is a known risk factor for bone mineral density decrease. Hypogonadism can be found in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer who are receiving androgen deprivation therapy, but can also be discovered in patients with male infertility or erectile dysfunction. Urologists have central role in men's health aftercare, and therefore have key role in the screening and in the multidisciplinary treatment of osteoporosis and osteopenia.

Combining bone resorption markers and heel quantitative ultrasound to discriminate between fracture cases and controls.

This nested case-control analysis of a Swiss ambulatory cohort of elderly women assessed the discriminatory power of urinary markers of bone resorption and heel quantitative ultrasound for non-vertebral fractures. The tests all discriminated between cases and controls, but combining the two strategies yielded no additional relevant information. INTRODUCTION: Data are limited regarding the combination of bone resorption markers and heel quantitative bone ultrasound (QUS) in the detection of women at risk for fracture. METHODS: In a nested case-control analysis, we studied 368 women (mean age 76.2 +/- 3.2 years), 195 with low-trauma non-vertebral fractures and 173 without, matched for age, BMI, medical center, and follow-up duration, from a prospective study designed to predict fractures. Urinary total pyridinolines (PYD) and deoxypyridinolines (DPD) were measured by high performance liquid chromatography. All women underwent bone evaluations using Achilles+ and Sahara heel QUS. RESULTS: Areas under the receiver operating-characteristic curve (AUC) for discriminative models of the fracture group, with 95% confidence intervals, were 0.62 (0.56-0.68) and 0.59 (0.53-0.65) for PYD and DPD, and 0.64 (0.58-0.69) and 0.65 (0.59-0.71) for Achilles+ and Sahara QUS, respectively. The combination of resorption markers and QUS added no significant discriminatory information to either measurement alone with an AUC of 0.66 (0.60-0.71) for Achilles+ with PYD and 0.68 (0.62-0.73) for Sahara with PYD. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary bone resorption markers and QUS are equally discriminatory between non-vertebral fracture patients and controls. However, the combination of bone resorption markers and QUS is not better than either test used alone.