Prophylaxis of experimental endocarditis with antiplatelet and antithrombin agents : a role for long-term prevention of infective endocarditis in humans?

BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis (IE) mostly occurs after spontaneous low-grade bacteremia. Thus, IE cannot be prevented by circumstantial antibiotic prophylaxis. Platelet activation following bacterial-fibrinogen interaction or thrombin-mediated fibrinogen-fibrin polymerization is a critical step in vegetation formation. We tested the efficacy of antiplatelet and antithrombin to prevent experimental IE. METHODS: A rat model of experimental IE following prolonged low-grade bacteremia mimicking smoldering bacteremia in humans was used. Prophylaxis with antiplatelets (aspirin, ticlopidine [alone or in combination], eptifibatide, or abciximab) or anticoagulants (antithrombin dabigatran etexilate or anti-vitamin K acenocoumarol) was started 2 days before inoculation with Streptococcus gordonii or Staphylococcus aureus. Valve infection was assessed 24 hours later. RESULTS: Aspirin plus ticlopidine, as well as abciximab, protected 45%-88% of animals against S. gordonii and S. aureus IE (P < .05). Dabigatran etexilate protected 75% of rats against IE due to S. aureus (P < .005) but failed to protect against S. gordonii (<30% protection). Acenocoumarol was ineffective. CONCLUSIONS: Antiplatelet and direct antithrombin agents may be useful in the prophylaxis of IE in humans. In particular, the potential dual benefit of dabigatran etexilate might be reconsidered for patients with prosthetic valves, who require life-long anticoagulation and in whom S. aureus IE is associated with high mortality.

Atividade antimicrobiana das pastilhas de Paraformaldeído reproduzindo as condições de uso nas instituições de saúde do Brasil

A atividade antimicrobiana das Pastilhas de Paraformaldeído, reproduzindo as condições de uso das Instituições de Saúde do Brasil (sem o aquecimento, sem o acréscimo da umidade relativa, a 5%, por um período longo de exposição de 12 horas), foi avaliada "in vitro" por meio do monitoramento microbiológico, segundo a metodologia da AOAC, adotada oficialmente pelo Ministério da Saúde do Brasil para o registro dessa categoria de produtos. Os resultados dos experimentos refutaram a ação esterilizante das Pastilhas de Paraformaldeído nestas condições. Diante destes resultados, realizou-se, então, os testes para avaliação desinfetante do produto utilizando-se o Método de Diluição de Uso, preconizada pela AOAC, adaptado para produtos gasosos, contra os microrganismos teste padronizados Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC nº. 6538), Samonella choleraesuis (ATCC nº. 10708) e Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC nº. 15442). Nestes experimentos, os resultados das culturas mostraram-se 100% negativos contra todas as bactérias testadas inferindo-se indícios de atividade desinfetante de alto nível.

Impact of infection on the prognosis of critically ill cirrhotic patients: results from a large worldwide study.

BACKGROUND: Infections are a leading cause of death in patients with advanced cirrhosis, but there are relatively few data on the epidemiology of infection in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with cirrhosis. AIMS: We used data from the Extended Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) II 1-day point-prevalence study to better define the characteristics of infection in these patients. METHODS: We compared characteristics, including occurrence and types of infections in non-cirrhotic and cirrhotic patients who had not undergone liver transplantation. RESULTS: The EPIC II database includes 13,796 adult patients from 1265 ICUs: 410 of the patients had cirrhosis. The prevalence of infection was higher in cirrhotic than in non-cirrhotic patients (59 vs. 51%, P < 0.01). The lungs were the most common site of infection in all patients, but abdominal infections were more common in cirrhotic than in non-cirrhotic patients (30 vs. 19%, P < 0.01). Infected cirrhotic patients more often had Gram-positive (56 vs. 47%, P < 0.05) isolates than did infected non-cirrhotic patients. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was more frequent in cirrhotic patients. The hospital mortality rate of cirrhotic patients was 42%, compared to 24% in the non-cirrhotic population (P < 0.001). Severe sepsis and septic shock were associated with higher in-hospital mortality rates in cirrhotic than in non-cirrhotic patients (41% and 71% vs. 30% and 49%, respectively, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Infection is more common in cirrhotic than in non-cirrhotic ICU patients and more commonly caused by Gram-positive organisms, including MRSA. Infection in patients with cirrhosis was associated with higher mortality rates than in non-cirrhotic patients.

Histone deacetylase inhibitors impair antibacterial defenses of macrophages

Les déacetylases d'histones (HDACs) déacétylent non seulement les histones, ce qui a généralement pour effet d'augmenter la transcription et l'expression génique, mais également d'autres protéines comme par exemple des protéines de choc thermique (HSP90), la tubuline alpha, certains récepteurs aux stéroïdes ainsi que de nombreux facteurs de transcription (NF-kB p65, Sp1, etc.). Ainsi les HDACs participent au contrôle de nombreux processus cellulaires. Les inhibiteurs des HDACs (ou HDACi), de part leur capacité à induire la différenciation cellulaire et l'apoptose, sont parmi les anti-cancéreux les plus prometteurs en cours de développement pour dans le traitement des néoplasies solides et hématologiques. Récemment, l'activité anti-inflammatoire et immuno- modulatrice des HDACi a été mise en évidence et exploitée avec succès pour le traitement de pathologies auto-immunes dans des modèles précliniques. L'effet des HDACi sur la réponse immunitaire innée restant largement inconnu, nous avons entrepris la première étude d'envergure dans ce domaine. Dans un premier article, nous démontrons que les HDACi inhibent l'expression de nombreux gènes (récepteurs aux produits microbiens, cytokines, chimiokines, molécules d'adhésion et co-stimulatrices, facteurs de croissance, etc.) impliqués dans les défenses anti¬infectieuses in vitro. En accord avec ces données, les HDACi augmentent la mortalité d'animaux infectés dans des modèles de pneumonie et de candidose bénignes. De manière congruente, les HDACi protègent les animaux de mortalité induite par choc toxique et septique en inhibant la réponse inflammatoire exubérante qui caractérise ces pathologies (Roger T. et al., Blood 2011). Afin de caractériser plus en détails l'influence des HDACi sur la réponse immunitaire innée, nous avons également analysé l'impact de deux HDACi, l'acide valproïque (VPA) et la trichostatin A (TSA), sur les principaux mécanismes de défenses antimicrobiennes des macrophages. Dans un second article (Mombelli et al., Journal of Infectious Diseases 2011), nous rapportons que la VPA et la TSA diminuent la capacité des macrophages à phagocyter et à détruire les bactéries Gram-positives Staphylococcus aureus et Gram-négatives Escherichia coli. En accord avec ces données, les HDACi inhibent l'expression de molécules impliquées dans la phagocytose comme les récepteurs éboueurs (Msr 1 et CD14) et de type lectine (Dectin 1), ainsi que les récepteurs aux opsonines (intégrines). Par ailleurs, les HDACi interfèrent avec l'expression de différentes sous unités de la NADPH oxydase (gp91p"ox, p22 phox, p47 phox, p40 phox, p67 phox et Rac2) et de l'oxyde nitrique (NO) synthétase inductible (iNOS), qui sont responsables de la production de dérivés oxygénés (ROS) et nitrogénés (NO) essentiels à la destruction des microorganismes dans le phagolysosome. En résumé, cette étude décrit des mécanismes par lesquels les HDACi diminuent la capacité d'ingérer et de détruire les bactéries, et ainsi augmentent la susceptibilité aux infections. Globalement, nos données indiquent que les HDACi sont de puissants anti¬inflammatoires qui pourraient favoriser la survenue d'infections chez les patients cancéreux traités avec ces drogues, comme semble par ailleurs le suggérer des études cliniques rapportées dans la littérature. Nous proposons un suivi clinique infectieux strict chez les patients traités avec ces agents.

The efficacy of amoxycillin/clavulanate (Augmentin) in the treatment of severe staphylococcal infections.

The experimental and clinical values of amoxycillin/clavulanate in severe Staphylococcus aureus infections are reviewed. Experimentally, amoxycillin/clavulanate was highly effective in the treatment of acute endocarditis due to methicillin-sensitive isolates of S. aureus (MSSA) in rats. In addition, high doses of amoxycillin/clavulanate also cured experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant strains of S. aureus (MRSA) in the animal model. In the clinical setting, a review of 86 patients with either community- or hospital-acquired bacteraemia due to MSSA showed that intravenous treatment with amoxycillin/clavulanate was adequate for empirical (and apparently also long-term) therapy of such severe infections. However, the retrospective nature of the analysis did not allow assessment of the relative efficacy of amoxycillin/clavulanate as compared with standard anti-staphylococcal drugs, such as flucloxacillin or vancomycin. Further prospective studies are warranted to address this issue. Thus, amoxycillin/clavulanate appears to be a good candidate for empirical treatment of severe infections that may be caused by MSSA. Usage of amoxycillin/clavulanate against MRSA is, however, still experimental and is not currently advocated for the treatment of MRSA infections in humans.