Proceedings of the Court Martial Held by Order of Major Merritt

Proceedings of the court martial held by order of Major Merritt (1 double-sided page, handwritten): Captain Hamilton gave evidence against Caleb Cook (a private in Major Merritt’s Company of Light Dragoons) for disobedience and leaving quarters without leave of absence. Cook was fined and ordered to spend one month in prison. The document is stained and has holes in it along the middle fold. This does not affect the text, Aug. 7, 1812.

Henry VIII and his court : Catharine Parr ; an historical novel

UANL

Frederick the great and his court

UANL

Aide-mémoire de thérapeutique

UANL

La prévisibilité à long terme des rendements des actifs financiers: leur dépendance significative du carré et du cube du ratio dividende-prix.

Rapport de recherche

Alternative Models of Court Administration

Canadian Judicial Council

Croissance economique de long terme et capital humain.

Rapport de recherche

La théorie de la parité des taux d'intérêts et la théorie moderne du marché des changes à terme, le cas du Canada et des États-Unis.

Rapport de recherche

La valeur exposée au risque à long terme, appliquée au risque de marché.

Rapport de stage (maîtrise en finance mathématique et computationnelle)

Système de transactions automatiques sur le marché des contrats à terme sur le taux d’intérêt.

Rapport de stage (maîtrise en finance mathématique et computationnelle)

La structure à terme des taux d'intérêt.

Rapport de recherche

Determination du taux de change de long terme application du modele generalise de la parite non-couverte des taux d'interet: Cas du Canada.

Rapport de recherche

Évaluation des options sur le marché à terme du gaz naturel.

Rapport de stage (maîtrise en finance mathématique et computationnelle)

Driedger's 'Modern Principle' at the Supreme Court of Canada: Interpretation, Justification, Legitimization

Un résumé en français est également disponible

Regulatory History Material as an Extrinsic Aid to Interpretation: An Empirical Study on the Use of RIAS by the Federal Court of Canada

Since 1986, the Canadian Public Administration is required to analyze the socio-economic impact of new regulatory requirements or regulatory changes. To report on its analysis, a Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement (RIAS) is produced and published in the Canada Gazette with the proposed regulation to which it pertains for notice to, and comments by, interested parties. After the allocated time for comments has elapsed, the regulation is adopted with a final version of the RIAS. Both documents are again published in the Canada Gazette. As a result, the RIAS acquires the status of an official public document of the Government of Canada and its content can be argued in courts as an extrinsic aid to the interpretation of a regulation. In this paper, an analysis of empirical findings on the uses of this interpretative tool by the Federal Court of Canada is made. A sample of decisions classified as unorthodox show that judges are making determinations on the basis of two distinct sets of arguments built from the information found in a RIAS and which the author calls “technocratic” and “democratic”. The author argues that these uses raise the general question of “What makes law possible in our contemporary legal systems”? for they underline enduring legal problems pertaining to the knowledge and the acceptance of the law by the governed. She concludes that this new interpretive trend of making technocratic and democratic uses of a RIAS in case law should be monitored closely as it may signal a greater change than foreseen, and perhaps an unwanted one, regarding the relationship between the government and the judiciary.