Translation inhibitors stabilize Escherichia coli mRNAs independently of ribosome protection

Translation inhibitors such as chloramphenicol in prokaryotes or cycloheximide in eukaryotes stabilize many or most cellular mRNAs. In Escherichia coli, this stabilization is ascribed generally to the shielding of mRNAs by stalled ribosomes. To evaluate this interpretation, we examine here how inhibitors affect the stabilities of two untranslated RNAs, i.e., an engineered lacZ mRNA lacking a ribosome binding site, and a small regulatory RNA, RNAI. Whether they block elongation or initiation, all translation inhibitors tested stabilized these RNAs, indicating that stabilization does not necessarily reflect changes in packing or activity of translating ribosomes. Moreover, both the initial RNase E-dependent cleavage of RNAI and lacZ mRNA and the subsequent attack of RNAI by polynucleotide phosphorylase and poly(A)-polymerase were slowed. Among various possible mechanisms for this stabilization, we discuss in particular a passive model. When translation is blocked, rRNA synthesis is known to increase severalfold and rRNA becomes unstable. Meanwhile, the pools of RNase E and polynucleotide phosphorylase, which, in growing cells, are limited because these RNases autoregulate their own synthesis, cannot expand. The processing/degradation of newly synthesized rRNA would then titrate these RNases, causing bulk mRNA stabilization.

Visualization of elongation factor G on the Escherichia coli 70S ribosome: The mechanism of translocation

During protein synthesis, elongation factor G (EF-G) binds to the ribosome and promotes the step of translocation, a process in which tRNA moves from the A to the P site of the ribosome and the mRNA is advanced by one codon. By using three-dimensional cryo-electron microscopy, we have visualized EF-G in a ribosome–EF-G–GDP–fusidic acid complex. Fitting the crystal structure of EF-G–GDP into the cryo density map reveals a large conformational change mainly associated with domain IV, the domain that mimics the shape of the anticodon arm of the tRNA in the structurally homologous ternary complex of Phe-tRNAPhe, EF-Tu, and a GTP analog. The tip portion of this domain is found in a position that overlaps the anticodon arm of the A-site tRNA, whose position in the ribosome is known from a study of the pretranslocational complex, implying that EF-G displaces the A-site tRNA to the P site by physical interaction with the anticodon arm.

A trans-acting RNA as a control switch in Escherichia coli: DsrA modulates function by forming alternative structures

DsrA is an 87-nucleotide regulatory RNA of Escherichia coli that acts in trans by RNA–RNA interactions with two different mRNAs, hns and rpoS. DsrA has opposite effects on these transcriptional regulators. H-NS levels decrease, whereas RpoS (σs) levels increase. Here we show that DsrA enhances hns mRNA turnover yet stabilizes rpoS mRNA, either directly or via effects on translation. Computational and RNA footprinting approaches led to a refined structure for DsrA, and a model in which DsrA interacts with the hns mRNA start and stop codon regions to form a coaxial stack. Analogous bipartite interactions exist in eukaryotes, albeit with different regulatory consequences. In contrast, DsrA base pairs in discrete fashion with the rpoS RNA translational operator. Thus, different structural configurations for DsrA lead to opposite regulatory consequences for target RNAs.

Altering the anaerobic transcription factor FNR confers a hemolytic phenotype on Escherichia coli K12

The recent outbreaks of Escherichia coli 0157-associated food poisoning have focused attention on the virulence determinants of E. coli. Here, it is reported that single base substitutions in the fnr gene encoding the oxygen-responsive transcription regulator FNR (fumarate and nitrate reduction regulator) are sufficient to confer a hemolytic phenotype on E. coli K12, the widely used laboratory strain. The mechanism involves enhancing the expression of a normally dormant hemolysin gene (hlyE) located in the E. coli chromosome. The mutations direct single amino acid substitutions in the activating regions (AR1 and AR3) of FNR that contact RNA polymerase. It is concluded that altering a resident transcription regulator, or acquisition of a competent heterologous regulator, could generate a pool of hemolytic, and therefore more virulent, strains of E. coli in nature.

The adenomatous polyposis coli-binding protein EB1 is associated with cytoplasmic and spindle microtubules

The evolutionarily conserved protein EB1 originally was identified by its physical association with the carboxyl-terminal portion of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) tumor suppressor protein, an APC domain commonly mutated in familial and sporadic forms of colorectal neoplasia. The subcellular localization of EB1 in epithelial cells was studied by using immunofluorescence and biochemical techniques. EB1 colocalized both to cytoplasmic microtubules in interphase cells and to spindle microtubules during mitosis, with pronounced centrosome staining. The cytoskeletal array detected by anti-EB1 antibody was abolished by incubation of the cells with nocodazole, an agent that disrupts microtubules; upon drug removal, EB1 localized to the microtubule-organizing center. Immunofluorescence analysis of SW480, a colon cancer cell line that expresses only carboxyl-terminal-deleted APC unable to interact with EB1, demonstrated that EB1 remained localized to the microtubule cytoskeleton, suggesting that this pattern of subcellular distribution is not mediated by its interaction with APC. In vitro cosedimentation with taxol-stabilized microtubules demonstrated that a significant fraction of EB1 associated with microtubules. Recent studies of the yeast EB1 homologues Mal3 and Bim1p have demonstrated that both proteins localize to microtubules and are important in vivo for microtubule function. Our results demonstrate that EB1 is a novel component of the microtubule cytoskeleton in mammalian cells. Associating with the mitotic apparatus, EB1 may play a physiologic role connecting APC to cellular division, coordinating the control of normal growth and differentiation processes in the colonic epithelium.

The reductive enzyme thioredoxin 1 acts as an oxidant when it is exported to the Escherichia coli periplasm

Thioredoxin 1 is a major thiol-disulfide oxidoreductase in the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli. One of its functions is presumed to be the reduction of the disulfide bond in the active site of the essential enzyme ribonucleotide reductase. Thioredoxin 1 is kept in a reduced state by thioredoxin reductase. In a thioredoxin reductase null mutant however, most of thioredoxin 1 is in the oxidized form; recent reports have suggested that this oxidized form might promote disulfide bond formation in vivo. In the Escherichia coli periplasm, the protein disulfide isomerase DsbC is maintained in the reduced and active state by the membrane protein DsbD. In a dsbD null mutant, DsbC accumulates in the oxidized form. This oxidized form is then able to promote disulfide bond formation. In both these cases, the inversion of the function of these thiol oxidoreductases appears to be due to an altered redox balance of the environment in which they find themselves. Here, we show that thioredoxin 1 attached to the alkaline phosphatase signal sequence can be exported into the E. coli periplasm. In this new environment for thioredoxin 1, we show that thioredoxin 1 can promote disulfide bond formation and, therefore, partially complement a dsbA strain defective for disulfide bond formation. Thus, we provide evidence that by changing the location of thioredoxin 1 from cytoplasm to periplasm, we change its function from a reductant to an oxidant. We conclude that the in vivo redox function of thioredoxin 1 depends on the redox environment in which it is localized.

Efficient translesion replication in the absence of Escherichia coli Umu proteins and 3′–5′ exonuclease proofreading function

Translesion replication (TR) past a cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer in Escherichia coli normally requires the UmuD′2C complex, RecA protein, and DNA polymerase III holoenzyme (pol III). However, we find that efficient TR can occur in the absence of the Umu proteins if the 3′–5′ exonuclease proofreading activity of the pol III ɛ-subunit also is disabled. TR was measured in isogenic uvrA6 ΔumuDC strains carrying the dominant negative dnaQ allele, mutD5, or ΔdnaQ spq-2 mutations by transfecting them with single-stranded M13-based vectors containing a specifically located cis-syn T–T dimer. As expected, little TR was observed in the ΔumuDC dnaQ+ strain. Surprisingly, 26% TR occurred in UV-irradiated ΔumuDC mutD5 cells, one-half the frequency found in a uvrA6 umuDC+mutD5 strain. lexA3 (Ind−) derivatives of the strains showed that this TR was contingent on two inducible functions, one LexA-dependent, responsible for ≈70% of the TR, and another LexA-independent, responsible for the remaining ≈30%. Curiously, the ΔumuDC ΔdnaQ spq-2 strain exhibited only the LexA-independent level of TR. The cause of this result appears to be the spq-2 allele, a dnaE mutation required for viability in ΔdnaQ strains, since introduction of spq-2 into the ΔumuDC mutD5 strain also reduces the frequency of TR to the LexA-independent level. The molecular mechanism responsible for the LexA-independent TR is unknown but may be related to the UVM phenomenon [Palejwala, V. A., Wang, G. E., Murphy, H. S. & Humayun, M. Z. (1995) J. Bacteriol. 177, 6041–6048]. LexA-dependent TR does not result from the induction of pol II, since TR in the ΔumuDC mutD5 strain is unchanged by introduction of a ΔpolB mutation.