The Emergence of Forensic Nursing and Advanced Nursing Practice in Switzerland: An Innovative Case Study Consultation.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS:: The objectives of this article were to systematically describe and examine the novel roles and responsibilities assumed by nurses in a forensic consultation for victims of violence at a University Hospital in French-speaking Switzerland. Utilizing a case study methodology, information was collected from two main sources: (a) discussion groups with nurses and forensic pathologists and (b) a review of procedures and protocols. Following a critical content analysis, the roles and responsibilities of the forensic nurses were described and compared with the seven core competencies of advanced nursing practice as outlined by Hamric, Spross, and Hanson (2009). RESULTS:: Advanced nursing practice competencies noted in the analysis included "direct clinical practice," "coaching and guidance," and "collaboration." The role of the nurse in terms of "consultation," "leadership," "ethics," and "research" was less evident in the analysis. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION:: New forms of nursing are indeed practiced in the forensic clinical setting, and our findings suggest that nursing practice in this domain is following the footprints of an advanced nursing practice model. Further reflections are required to determine whether the role of the forensic nurse in Switzerland should be developed as a clinical nurse specialist or that of a nurse practitioner.

Stress ulcer prophylaxis in non-critically ill patients: a prospective evaluation of the practice in a surgical ward

Introduction The benefit of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in noncriticallyill patients has not been proved. Over-prescription of SUP isnot devoided of risks (i.e. drug-drug interactions, adverse events).This prospective study aimed to evaluate the use of proton pumpinhibitors (PPIs) for SUP in a visceral surgery ward.Materials & Methods Data collection was performed prospectivelyduring a 8-week period on patients hospitalized in a visceral surgeryward (58 beds). Patients with a PPI prescription for the treatment ofulcers, gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophagitis or epigastralgiawere excluded as well as patients hospitalized twice during the studyperiod. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists guidelineson SUP were used to assess the appropriateness of de novo PPIprescriptions.Results Among 255 patients in the study, 138 (54.1%) received aprophylaxis with PPI, of which 86 (62.3%) were de novo PPI prescriptions.93.5% of patients received esomeprazole (according to thehospital drug formulary) mainly orally at 40 mg qd. 79.1% of patientshad no risk factors for SUP. 17.9% and 3.0% had one and two riskfactors, respectively. 95% of the patients with PPI were not hospitalizedin the intensive care unit (ICU) before their stay in the visceralsurgery ward. At discharge, PPI therapy was continued in 34.2% ofpatients with a de novo PPI prescription.Discussion & Conclusion This study highlights the over-utilizationof PPIs in non-ICU patients and the inappropriate continuation of PPIprescriptions at discharge. The PPI dosage prescribed for prophylaxiswas probably too high compared with the data of the literature.Treatment recommendations for SUP are needed to restrict PPIuse for justified indications.

How do Swiss Gastroenterologists assess Activity of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Daily Practice: by Clinical Indices, Endoscopic Activity, or Biomarkers?

Background a nd A ims: There is a n ongoing d ebate which i sthe most appropriate w ay t o measure inflammatory boweldisease (IBD) activity (be it b y clinical i ndices, e ndoscopy, orbiomarkers). Accumulating evidence associates m ucosalhealing with a reduction in I BD-related s urgery andhospitalizations. We a imed to i nvestigate which outcomeparameters are used in daily practice for IBD monitoring.Methods: A q uestionnaire was sent in J uly 2010 t o all boardcertified gastroenterologists in S witzerland to evaluate t heassessment strategy of IBD activity, t he items on whichtherapeutic decisions w ere based upon, and the kind ofbiomarkers used for monitoring IBD activity.Results: Response rate was 57% (153/270). Mean physician'sage was 5 0±9years, mean duration o f gastroenterologicpractice 1 4±8years, 52% of them were working in p rivatepractice a nd 48% in h ospitals. S eventy-eight percent usedclinical activity i ndices as g old standard for IBD activityassessment, followed by 15% choosing endoscopic activity, and7% favouring biomarkers. Gastroenterologists based theirtherapeutic decisions in 70% on clinical activity indices, 24% onendoscopic activity, a nd 6% o n biomarkers. Most frequentlyused biomarkers were C-reactive protein (94%), complete bloodcount (78%) and fecal calprotectin (74%).Conclusions: I n daily p ractice, most IBD patients a remonitored based u pon t heir clinical a ctivity. B iomarkers a reperceived as l ess important compared to clinical andendoscopic activity. S imilar to activity a ssessment, alsotherapeutic decisions a re mostly made on the basis of clinicalactivity indices. The upcoming scientific evidence on the impactof mucosal h ealing does n ot yet seem to influence the dailypractice of gastroenterologists.

Les bonnes pratiques dompteront-elles la recherche clinique [Will good clinical practice domesticate human research?]

During recent years, an increasingly comprehensive set of rules and guidelines has been developed around clinical trials, to ensure their proper ethical, methodological, administrative and financial conduct. While initially limited to new drug development, this regulation is progressively invading all areas of clinical research, with limited respect for the heterogeneity in aims, resources, sponsors and epistemological grounds. No clinical study should be planned without consideration of a series of legal requirements, which are reviewed. Concerns about their practical implications are critically assessed.