Operator, organizational, direct support, and general support maintenance manual : editorial and photomechanical shelter, NSN 3610-00-987-9066, component of printing plant, special warfare, transportable, NSN 3610-00-889-3311.

"June 1978."

Direct support and general support maintenance manual for shelter system, collective protection, chemical-biological, inflatable, trailer-transported, M51 (NSN 4240-00-854-4144).

Includes index.

Operator's and organizational maintenance manual : shelter system, collective protection, chemical-biological, inflatable, trailer-transported, M51 (NSN 4240-00-854-4144).

"August 1975."

Direct support and general support maintenance manual for shelter system, collective protection, chemical-biological, inflatable, trailer-transported, M51 (NSN 4240-00-854-4144).

"December 1975."

Organizational and direct support maintenance repair parts and special tools list : shelter, inflatable, w/airlock (Airesearch Manufacturing Co. model S1W2), FSN 5410-933-9388.

"October 1968."

Organizational, direct support, and general support maintenance repair parts and special tools list for shelter, tactical, expandable, one-sided (NSN 5411-01-124-1377).

"8 August 1988."

Operator, organizational, direct support, and general support maintenance for shelter, tactical, expandable, two-sided (NSN 5411-01-136-9838).

"1 April 1986."

Operator, organizational, direct support, and general support maintenance manual : shelter, multipurpose, medical unit, self-contained, transportable (MUST) (Brunswick model CW1), NSN 5410-00-809-6634.

"June 1976."

Operator's, organizational, direct support, and general support maintenance repair parts and special tools lists (including depot maintenance repair parts and special tools) for shelter, electrical equipment S-318/G (NSN 5411-00-763-2339) and S-318A/G (NSN 5411-00-116-7086).

"25 June 1984."

Organizational, direct support, and general support maintenance repair parts and special tools lists (including depot maintenance repair parts and special tools) for shelter facility, S-390A/TRC-145 (NSN 5410-00-130-5806).

Includes index.

Depot packaging, depreservation, and field packaging instructions for nontactical generator sets and power plants : generator set, 700 kw electric (6115-00-596-3405) ...

"22 April 1983."

In-home Assessment of Turning and Transitions using Inertial Sensors in Older Adults with Dementia and Older Caregivers

Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016-06

Non-invasive Detection of Cortical Control Signals for Brain-Computer Interfaces

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2016-05

Approaches and Strategy for Cancer Research and Surveillance Data: Integration, Information Pipeline, Data Models, and Informatics Opportunities

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2016-04

Validity of accelerometry for measurement of activity in people with brain injury

Purpose: To evaluate the validity of a uniaxial accelerometer (MTI Actigraph) for measuring physical activity in people with acquired brain injury (ABI) using portable indirect calorimetry (Cosmed K4b(2)) as a criterion measure. Methods: Fourteen people with ABI and related gait pattern impairment (age 32 +/- 8 yr) wore an MTI Actigraph that measured activity (counts(.)min-(1)) and a Cosmed K4b(2) that measured oxygen consumption (mL(.)kg(-1.)min(-1)) during four activities: quiet sitting (QS) and comfortable paced (CP), brisk paced (BP), and fast paced (FP) walking. MET levels were predicted from Actigraph counts using a published equation and compared with Cosmed measures. Predicted METs for each of the 56 activity bouts (14 participants X 4 bouts) were classified (light, moderate, vigorous, or very vigorous intensity) and compared with Cosmed-based classifications. Results: Repeated-measures ANOVA indicated that walking condition intensities were significantly different (P < 0.05) and the Actigraph detected the differences. Overall correlation between measured and predicted METs was positive, moderate, and significant (r = 0.74). Mean predicted METs were not significantly different from measured for CP and BP, but for FP walking, predicted METs were significantly less than measured (P < 0.05). The Actigraph correctly classified intensity for 76.8% of all activity bouts and 91.5% of light- and moderate-intensity bouts. Conclusions: Actigraph counts provide a valid index of activity across the intensities investigated in this study. For light to moderate activity, Actigraph-based estimates of METs are acceptable for group-level analysis and are a valid means of classifying activity intensity. The Actigraph significantly underestimated higher intensity activity, although, in practice, this limitation will have minimal impact on activity measurement of most community-dwelling people with ABI.