Trends in Iowa Wildlife Populations and Harvest 2012, October 2013

A report by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources on the trends of Iowa wildlife populations and harvest.

Trends in Iowa Wildlife Populations and Harvest 2013, December 2014

A report by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources on the trends of Iowa wildlife populations and harvest.

Trends in Iowa Wildlife Populations and Harvest 2001, October 2002

A report by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources on the trends of Iowa wildlife populations and harvest.

Trends in Iowa Wildlife Populations and Harvest 2002, September 2003

A report by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources on the trends of Iowa wildlife populations and harvest.

Trends in Iowa Wildlife Populations and Harvest 2003, December 2004

A report by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources on the trends of Iowa wildlife populations and harvest.

Trends in Iowa Wildlife Populations and Harvest 2004, October 2005

A report by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources on the trends of Iowa wildlife populations and harvest.

Trends in Iowa Wildlife Populations and Harvest 2005, December 2006

A report by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources on the trends of Iowa wildlife populations and harvest.

Trends in Iowa Wildlife Populations and Harvest 2006, December 2007

A report by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources on the trends of Iowa wildlife populations and harvest.

Trends in Iowa Wildlife Populations and Harvest 2007, September 2008

A report by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources on the trends of Iowa wildlife populations and harvest.

Trends in Iowa Wildlife Populations and Harvest 2008, September 2009

A report by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources on the trends of Iowa wildlife populations and harvest.

Averting risk in the face of large losses: Bernoulli vs. Tversky and Kahneman

We experimentally question the assertion of Prospect Theory that people display risk attraction in choices involving high-probability losses. Indeed, our experimental participants tend to avoid fair risks for large (up to ? 90), high-probability (80%) losses. Our research hinges on a novel experimental method designed to alleviate the house-money bias that pervades experiments with real (not hypothetical) loses.Our results vindicate Daniel Bernoulli?s view that risk aversion is the dominant attitude,But, contrary to the Bernoulli-inspired canonical expected utility theory, we do find frequent risk attraction for small amounts of money at stake.In any event, we attempt neither to test expected utility versus nonexpected utility theories, nor to contribute to the important literature that estimates value and weighting functions. The question that we ask is more basic, namely: do people display risk aversion when facing large losses, or large gains? And, at the risk of oversimplifying, our answer is yes.

Methods for assessment of pre-harvest sprouting in wheat cultivars

The objective of this work was to test methods for pre-harvest sprouting assessment in wheat cultivars. Fourteen wheat cultivars were grown in Londrina and Ponta Grossa municipalities, Paraná state, Brazil. They were sampled at 10 and 17 days after physiological maturity and evaluated using the methods of germination by rainfall simulation (in a greenhouse), in-ear grain sprouting, and grains removed from the ears. The in-ear grain sprouting method allowed the differentiation of cultivars, but showed different resistance levels from the available description of cultivars. The sprouting of grain removed from the ears did not allow a reliable distinction of data on germination in any harvest date or location. The method of rainfall simulation is the most suitable for the assessment of cultivars as to pre-harvest sprouting, regardless of the sampling date and evaluated location.

Live trapping design for the harvest mouse (Micromys minutus) in its summer habitat

documented accurately since 1960. Most records are based on nest findings and there have been few direct observations or captures, mainly because live trapping of this species is not simple. Therefore, an efficient trapping technique is needed for population studies and to facilitate the management of its habitat. By combining the methods used to capture very small (Suncus etruscus) and climbing (Muscardinus avellanarius) mammals, we developed a design using Longworth traps with mouse excluders set on suspended platforms. This allowed us to trap more harvest mice in four field sessions of 60 trap-nights than have ever been caught previously since its discovery in Switzerland.

Production costs and fruit yield profitability in the initial harvest of custard apple trees

The aim of this study was to estimate the production cost and economic indicators associated with the production and sales of fruits from 20 custard apple progenies during the initial five harvests, in order to identify the harvest season from which custard apple exploitation becomes profitable, as well as the most promising progenies from an economic point of view. The fruit yield data upon which the present work was based were obtained during the period from 2001 to 2005, in an experiment that evaluated 20 custard apple half-sibling progenies, under sprinkler irrigation. The progenies were evaluated in a random block design with five replicates and plots consisting of four plants each. The exploitation of custard apple progenies only showed to be a profitable agribusiness after the fourth year. Before that, only A3 and A4 progenies in the second year, and P3 and P11 in the third year provided profitable incomes. Considering the methodological assumptions imposed concerning the time period analysis and the prices as of July 2007, the most important profitability indicators (operating profit, return index and equilibrium price) evidenced that the A4 progeny is the most recommended, although other progenies are also highlighted, such as FJ1 and FJ2. As already discussed, the progenies showing the highest average yields of five harvests are not always the most economically recommendable ones.