Minor allele frequency of myeloproliferative neoplasm mutations in the Irish blood donor population

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are rare diseases that include classic entities; polycythaemia vera, essential thrombocythaemia and primary myelofibrosis. In this short report, minor allele frequencies of common MPN mutations are compared between the Irish blood donor population and other populations of European descent using data from the Haplotype Map project. The Affymetrix array 6.0 platform was utilised identifying nine single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and six proxy SNPs. The variability of allele frequencies for MPN mutations could account for the different incidence rates seen between populations of European ancestry, giving a better understanding of the genetic predisposition to MPNs. 

A randomised comparison of daunorubicin 90mg/m2 vs 60mg/m2 in AML induction: results from the UK NCRI AML17 trial in 1206 patients

Modifying induction therapy in AML may improve the remission rate and reduce the risk of relapse thereby improving survival. Escalation of the daunorubicin dose to 90mg/m(2) has shown benefit for some patient subgroups when compared with a dose of 45mg/m(2) and has been recommended as a standard of care. However 60mg/m(2) is widely used and has never been directly compared to 90mg/m(2). As part of the UK NCRI AML17 trial 1206 adults with untreated AML or high risk MDS, mostly under 60 years of age, were randomised to a first induction course of chemotherapy which delivered either 90mg/m(2) or 60mg/m(2) on days 1,3 and 5 combined with cytosine arabinoside. All patients then received a second course which included daunorubicin 50mg/m(2) on days 1,3 and 5. There was no overall difference in complete remission rate (CR) (73% vs 75%, OR1.07 (0.83-1.39), p=0.6) or in any recognised subgroup. The 60 day mortality was increased in the 90mg/m2 arm (10% vs 5% (HR 1.98(1.30-3.02) p=0.001)), which resulted in no difference in overall 2 year survival (59% vs 60%, HR 1.16(0.95-1.43), p=0.15). In exploratory subgroup analysis there was no subgroup which showed significant benefit, although there was a significant interaction by FLT3 ITD mutation. The trial is registered to www.isrctn.com as ISRCTN55675535.

Vosaroxin and vosaroxin plus low-dose Ara-C (LDAC) vs low-dose Ara-C alone in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia

The development of new treatments for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia is an active area, but has met with limited success. Vosaroxin, a quinolone-derived intercalating agent has several properties that could prove beneficial. Initial clinical studies showed it to be well-tolerated in older patients with relapsed/refractory disease. In vitro data suggested synergy with cytarabine (Ara-C). To evaluate vosaroxin, we performed 2 randomized comparisons within the "Pick a Winner" program. A total of 104 patients were randomized to vosaroxin vs low-dose Ara-C (LDAC) and 104 to vosaroxin + LDAC vs LDAC. When comparing vosaroxin with LDAC, neither response rate (complete recovery [CR]/complete recovery with incomplete count recovery [CRi], 26% vs 30%; odds ratio [OR], 1.16 (0.49-2.72); P = .7) nor 12-month survival (12% vs 31%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.94 [1.26-3.00]; P = .003) showed benefit for vosaroxin. Likewise, in the vosaroxin + LDAC vs LDAC comparison, neither response rate (CR/CRi, 38% vs 34%; OR, 0.83 [0.37-1.84]; P = .6) nor survival (33% vs 37%; HR, 1.30 [0.81-2.07]; P = .3) was improved. A major reason for this lack of benefit was excess early mortality in the vosaroxin + LDAC arm, most obviously in the second month following randomization. At its first interim analysis, the Data Monitoring and Ethics Committee recommended closure of the vosaroxin-containing trial arms because a clinically relevant benefit was unlikely.

Factors influencing success of clinical genome sequencing across a broad spectrum of disorders

To assess factors influencing the success of whole-genome sequencing for mainstream clinical diagnosis, we sequenced 217 individuals from 156 independent cases or families across a broad spectrum of disorders in whom previous screening had identified no pathogenic variants. We quantified the number of candidate variants identified using different strategies for variant calling, filtering, annotation and prioritization. We found that jointly calling variants across samples, filtering against both local and external databases, deploying multiple annotation tools and using familial transmission above biological plausibility contributed to accuracy. Overall, we identified disease-causing variants in 21% of cases, with the proportion increasing to 34% (23/68) for mendelian disorders and 57% (8/14) in family trios. We also discovered 32 potentially clinically actionable variants in 18 genes unrelated to the referral disorder, although only 4 were ultimately considered reportable. Our results demonstrate the value of genome sequencing for routine clinical diagnosis but also highlight many outstanding challenges.