981 resultados para Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm,--1844-1900
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
7. bd., 2 abth., edited by Ludwig Boumann; 16.-17. bd. by Friedrich Förster and Ludwig Boumann; 18. bd. by Karl Rosenkranz.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Bibliography: p. [593]-[596]
Resumo:
Sammelrezension von: 1. Wilhelm von Humboldt: Briefe an Friedrich August Wolf. Textkritisch herausgegeben und kommentiert von Philip Mattson. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter 1990 635 S. 2. Italien im Bannkreis Napoleons. Die römischen Gesandtschaftsberichte Wilhelm von Humboldts an den Landgraf I Großherzog von Hessen-Darmstadt 1803-1809. Bearbeitet von Eva-Maria Feldschow und Ulrich Hussong. Herausgegeben von Eckhart G. Franz. Darmstadt: Hessische Historische Kommission 1989, 459 S.
Resumo:
The influence of the Essays of Michel de Montaigne on the thought of Friedrich Nietzsche has, hitherto, received scant scholarly attention. The aim of this thesis is to address this lacuna in the literature by making evident the importance of the Essays to the development of Nietzsche’s philosophy. I argue that, in order to fully appreciate Nietzsche’s thought, it must be recognized that, from the beginning to the end of his philosophical life, Montaigne was for him a thinker of the deepest personal and philosophical significance. Against the received scholarly opinion, which would see Montaigne as influential only for Nietzsche’s middle works, I contend that the Essays continue to be a key inspiration for Nietzsche even into his late and final works. Montaigne, with his cheerful affirmation of life, his experimental mode of philosophizing, and his resolutely naturalized perspective, was an exemplar for Nietzsche as a philosopher, psychologist, sceptic and naturalist. The Essays not only stimulated Nietzsche’s thinking on questions to do with morality, epistemology and the nature of the soul but also informed his conception of the ideal philosophical life. Moreover, to explore the Essays from a Nietzschean viewpoint, allows the drawing out of the more radical aspects of Montaigne’s thought, while to probe Montaigne’s impact on Nietzsche, provides insight into the trajectory of Nietzsche’s philosophy as he broke free from romantic pessimism and embraced the naturalism that would guide his works from Human, All Too Human onward.
Resumo:
In this thesis, I examine the relationship between the Kyoto School philosopher, Nishitani Keiji, and the work of Friedrich Nietzsche, focusing on the two thinkers’ respective approaches to the problem of nihilism. The work begins by positioning Nishitani’s interpretation of Nietzsche’s account of nihilism with reference to diverse readings of Nietzsche in Western scholarship. I then consider the development of Nishitani’s reading of Nietzsche from his lecture series on nihilism, The Self- Overcoming of Nihilism, through to his magnum opus, Religion and Nothingness. I make two key contributions to recent scholarly debate on Nishitani’s relationship to Nietzsche. The first is to emphasise the importance of Nishitani’s response to the idea of eternal recurrence for understanding his critical approach to Nietzsche’s thinking. I argue against the view, offered by Bret Davis, that Nishitani’s criticisms of Nietzsche are primarily based on the former’s negative assessment of the idea of will to power. The second contribution is to situate Nishitani’s critical approach to eternal recurrence within his broader attempt to formulate a Zen-influenced conception of temporality and historicity. I then argue for the necessity of this conceptual background for coming to grips with his conception of the ‘transhistorical’ grounds of historicity in emptiness (śūnyatā), as outlined in the later chapters of Religion and Nothingness.
Resumo:
This paper explores the problem of the synthesis between vitalism and rationalism, in contemporary philosophy. With this aim, we compare the intellectual careers of Georges Canguilhem (1904-1995) and José Ortega y Gasset (1883-1955). We contrast their conceptions of philosophy as “hybrid” knowledge, closely related to science, as well as their points of view on Vitalism, anthropology, the technique and the perspectivism. To avoid that comparison is purely abstract and ahistorical, we use the method of the sociology of philosophy. This forces us to locate both paths in their respective philosophical fields and generational units, also according to his social background and professional career.
Resumo:
Pretende-se, neste estudo, levar a cabo uma investigação aos primeiros escritos de Friedrich Nietzsche, com o intuito de compreender de que forma o manifesto jovial interesse do filósofo pelas questões da linguagem pode revelar-nos uma perspectiva muito particular e peculiar sobre a vida e sobre o homem em relação com a vida. Para tal, tentar-se-á demonstrar que subjacente ao problema da linguagem está a questão - herdada de Kant e de Schopenhauer - da inacessibilidade, por parte dos homens, à «coisa em si», e que a esta questão, por sua vez, corresponde um esboço da constituição do homem enquanto insuficiente e incompleta perante a tarefa de conhecer a essência das coisas, de conhecer-se a si mesmo e ao seu papel no cosmos. Por outra parte, dependendo o conhecimento humano da linguagem conceptual, será de particular relevância, numa primeira instância, analisar a noção Nietzschiana de metáfora e, por consequência, o papel que o autor concede ao esquecimento. Será posto em evidência e sob análise o ponto de vista do filósofo segundo o qual a linguagem conceptual resulta de um processo duplamente metafórico que transforma um X para nós inacessível numa imagem e essa imagem, posteriormente, num som, ou seja, numa palavra. Concluir-se-á que, para que o homem possa crer na representatividade das palavras, de acordo com os escritos aurorais de Nietzsche, tornar-se-ia imperiosa a capacidade de esquecer a génese metafórica dos conceitos. Por outras palavras, apenas mediante o esquecimento poderia o homem viver com alguma tranquilidade e serenidade, confiando na verdade resultante do imenso edifício de conceitos por si mesmo criado. Ora, uma vez que tal verdade seria meramente humana, não correspondendo, como tal, a uma veritas aeterna, Nietzsche desenvolve, por um lado, uma crítica à razão pós-Socrática e à metafísica teísta, ambas vigentes na modernidade e sustentadas por uma racionalidade incapaz, por definição, de aceder à verdade, e, por outro lado, uma metafísica de artista pensada a partir dos gregos pré-Socráticos. Para que possamos entender esta metafísica, teremos de reflectir acerca da dicotomia, evidenciada, em especial, no Nascimento da Tragédia, entre Apolo e Dioniso, representando o primeiro um mundo de belas formas plásticas e de sonhos, e o segundo o Uno primordial que romperia com o principium individuationis apolíneo. Acima de tudo mais, será do intuito desta reflexão perceber como, no espírito da tragédia grega, no centro do conflito entre os impulsos dionisíacos e apolíneos, Nietzsche descobre um jogo de transitoriedade, i.e. do devir, e entender qual o papel que o filósofo concede, nesse jogo, ao indivíduo, ou seja, ao homem.
Resumo:
UANL
Resumo:
Se presentan algunas de las ideas polémicas de Friedrich Nietzsche, pensador que desenmascara todas las formas convencionales de moralidad y crítico respecto a la ciencia. Nietzsche está próximo al existencialismo, fusiona la filosofía con la psicología, escribe sobre la muerte de Dios y examina el nihilismo y las actitudes alternativas frente a un mundo absurdo. Crítico literario, moviliza los resortes de la literatura para comunicar su filosofía. Se examina la columna vertebral de su filosofía: la voluntad de poder. Se trata la visión nietzscheana de la educación, donde se muestra muy crítico con aquellos que aceptan las creencias y los valores establecidos. Se desarrollan las críticas de Nietzsche contra el tecnicismo, la educación liberal y la moralidad.
Resumo:
This work has a study object the main thinking work of Johan Kaspar Schmidt well known as Max Stirner (1806-1856) - originally titled (in German), Der Einzige und sein Eigentun, and translated into Portuguese by the Portuguese publisher Antígona in 2004, under the title The Unique and its Ownership. This book was known in 1844 although its publication dated 1845 seen that the censor of that time rejected the publication request in that year - saying that ( ) in concrete passages of that work, not only God, Christ, the church and the religion are usually object of proposal blasphemy, but also because all social order, the state and the government are defined as something that should not exist simultaneously as one justifies the lie, perjury, the murder and suicide and denies the ownership right. After this first attack and rejection by its bearing the unique come to be others target, due practically to all the philosophical political thinkers its time including thinkers like Ludwig Feuerbach and Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels in spite of, on the other hand, having inspired formulations and reformulations of many of those thinkers that were against then in their times, as well as those thinkers that came after then such as Nietzsche himself. Even though this work was be victim of powerful attempts of erasing it of history, it has shown a great repercussion power and that is the main reason that led us to ask the following questions what is its big originality? , how could his author arrive at a so impactant perspective? What is its most legitimate political place? We endeavored in elaborate answers to those questions trough the exegesis of its text, taking in account both the scholarship environment where the author produced his intellectual life set - and the detailed reading of texts linked to discussion in focus, where this reading is always based upon the meaning and senses traced by the texts and its contexts as a precaution against the limits and the traps of the readings which shed light markedly on strict letter of the phrases constructs. Ours conclusions point at to the idea that a work like this , that subverts the characteristic ways of thought of the modernity, completely, continues being a utter odds, without rank in the history of thought and the moderns political practices, finding parallel possibility only, in a very special way, with a certain autharchic perspective of Ancient Greece