970 resultados para Miami University (Oxford, Ohio)
Resumo:
Photocopy. Ann Arbor, Mich. : University Microfilms International, 1980.--21 cm.
Resumo:
Microfilm. Ann Arbor, Mich., University Microfilms [n.d.] (American culture series, Reel 78.10)
Resumo:
Includes 99 leaves of engravings.
Resumo:
Issued as The Ohio State University Bulletin, vol.20, no.28; vol.21, no.3, 13, 29; vol.22, no.8-10, 30, 34; vol. 23, no.13-14, 34-35; vol.24, no.7, 14, 32, 37
Resumo:
Official Organ of the Biological Club of the Ohio State University, 1900-Nov.1903; of the Ohio Academy of Science, Dec.1903-May1931 (with the Biological Club of the Ohio State University, Dec.1903-June 1915; the Ohio State University Scientific Society, Nov.1915-1926)
Resumo:
Published also in same series without thesis note.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Photocopy.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Aims: To determine the acceptability to university students of practitioner-delivered screening and brief intervention (SBI) versus a novel approach-web-based SBI (e-SBI). Methods: A random sample of 1910 university students was invited to indicate their preferences for various brief intervention approaches in an internet survey. Results: e-SBI was the most popular intervention. It was favoured by 81% of all students and 82% of hazardous drinkers. Conclusions: e-SBI is a promising approach for the reduction of hazardous drinking among young people.
Resumo:
Aims: University student alcohol misuse is a considerable problem. Alcohol expectancy research has contributed significantly to our understanding of problem drinking in young adults. Most of this research has investigated positive expectancy alone. The current study utilized two measures of alcohol expectancy, the alcohol expectancy questionnaire (AEQ) and the drinking expectancy profile [consisting of the drinking expectancy questionnaire (DEQ) and the drinking refusal self-efficacy questionnaire] to predict severity of alcohol dependence, frequency of drinking, and the quantity of alcohol consumed per occasion. Methods: Measures of drinking behaviour and alcohol expectancy were completed by 174 undergraduate university students. Results: Positive alcohol expectancy factors accounted for significant variance in all three drinking indices, with the DEQ adding additional variance to AEQ scores on frequency and severity of alcohol dependence indices. Negative expectancy did not add incremental variance to the prediction of drinking behaviour in this sample. Drinking refusal self-efficacy and dependence beliefs added additional variance over positive and negative expectancies in the prediction of all three drinking parameters. Conclusions: Positive expectancy and drinking refusal self-efficacy were strongly related to university student drinking. The incorporation of expectancy as a means of informing prevention approaches in tertiary education shows promise.