Iowa's Barriers to Prenatal Care Project: 2-14 Data Summary, July 2015

The findings in this summary are based on the Iowa Barriers to Prenatal Care project. Ongoing since 1991, the purpose of this project is to obtain brief, accurate information about women delivering babies in Iowa hospitals. Specifically, the project seeks to learn about women’s experiences getting prenatal or delivery care during their current pregnancy. Other information is included which may be pertinent to health planners or those concerned with the systematic development of health care services. This project is a cooperative venture of all of Iowa’s maternity hospitals, the University of Northern Iowa Center for Social and Behavioral Research, and the Iowa Department of Public Health. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation funded the first three years of this project. The current funding is provided by the Iowa Department of Public Health. The Director is Dr. Mary Losch, University of Northern Iowa Center for Social and Behavioral Research. The Coordinator for the project is Rodney Muilenburg. The questionnaire is distributed to nearly ninety maternity hospitals across the state of Iowa. Nursing staff or those responsible for obtaining birth certificate information in the obstetrics unit are responsible for approaching all birth mothers prior to dismissal and requesting their participation in the study. The questionnaire takes approximately ten minutes to complete. Completed questionnaires are returned to the University of Northern Iowa Center for Social and Behavioral Research for data entry and analysis. Returns are made monthly, weekly, or biweekly depending on the number of births per week in a given hospital. Except in the case of a mother who is too ill to complete the questionnaire, all mothers are eligible to be recruited for participation. The present yearly report includes an analysis of large Iowa cities, African American mothers, and a trend analysis of the last ten years. Also presented in this report is a frequency analysis of all variables included in the 2012 questionnaire. Unless otherwise noted, all entries reflect percentages. Please note that because percentages were rounded, total values may not equal 100%. Data presented are based upon 2012 questionnaires received to date (n = 23,674). All analyses reflect unweighted percentages of those responding.

Iowa’s Title V Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Annual Report, 2012

Title V of the Social Security Act is the longest-standing public health legislation in American history. Enacted in 1935, Title V is a federal-state partnership that promotes and improves maternal and child health (MCH). According to each state’s unique needs, Title V supports a spectrum of services, from infrastructure building services like quality assurance and policy development, to gap-filling direct health care services. Title V resources are directed towards MCH priority populations: pregnant women, mothers, infants, women of reproductive years, children and adolescents and children and youth with special health care needs.

Do health care providers use online patient ratings to improve the quality of care?

Background: Physician-rating websites have become a popular tool to create more transparency about the quality of health care providers. So far, it remains unknown whether online-based rating websites have the potential to contribute to a better standard of care. Objective: Our goal was to examine which health care providers use online rating websites and for what purposes, and whether health care providers use online patient ratings to improve patient care. Methods: We conducted an online-based cross-sectional study by surveying 2360 physicians and other health care providers (September 2015). In addition to descriptive statistics, we performed multilevel logistic regression models to ascertain the effects of providers' demographics as well as report card-related variables on the likelihood that providers implement measures to improve patient care. Results: Overall, more than half of the responding providers surveyed (54.66%, 1290/2360) used online ratings to derive measures to improve patient care (implemented measures: mean 3.06, SD 2.29). Ophthalmologists (68%, 40/59) and gynecologists (65.4%, 123/188) were most likely to implement any measures. The most widely implemented quality measures were related to communication with patients (28.77%, 679/2360), the appointment scheduling process (23.60%, 557/2360), and office workflow (21.23%, 501/2360). Scaled-survey results had a greater impact on deriving measures than narrative comments. Multilevel logistic regression models revealed medical specialty, the frequency of report card use, and the appraisal of the trustworthiness of scaled-survey ratings to be significantly associated predictors for implementing measures to improve patient care because of online ratings. Conclusions: Our results suggest that online ratings displayed on physician-rating websites have an impact on patient care. Despite the limitations of our study and unintended consequences of physician-rating websites, they still may have the potential to improve patient care.

Implantation d’une innovation au sein d’une région rurale éloignée au Québec : le rôle d’infirmière praticienne spécialisée en soins de première ligne- une étude de cas multiples

Introduction : La situation de l’accès, de la continuité et de la coordination des services de santé au Canada et au Québec est des plus préoccupantes. Pour contribuer à résoudre ces problématiques, l’élargissement des champs de pratique professionnels a été proposé. Lorsqu’il est question d’élargir le rôle des infirmières, la pratique infirmière avancée (PIA) est fréquemment abordée. Au Québec, ce n’est qu’en 2006 qu’un rôle associé à la PIA en première ligne a pu officiellement être mis en place, celui d’infirmière praticienne spécialisée en soins de première ligne (IPSPL) (Durand, Allard, & Ménard, 2006). L’implantation du rôle d’IPSPL est récente et peut être conçue comme une innovation. Les difficultés liées à l’implantation des rôles de PIA font l’objet d’un consensus. Pour pallier à ces difficultés, il est proposé d’approfondir la compréhension de la façon dont les rôles de PIA sont implantés, et ce, en considérant les contextes. Encore peu de recherches s’intéressent au processus d’implantation du rôle d’IPSPL au Québec, et aucune n’est centrée sur le contexte rural éloigné. But : Cette recherche vise à comprendre le processus d’implantation du rôle d’IPSPL au sein d’une région rurale éloignée du Québec, à travers l’éclairage d’un cadre de référence intégrant les théories de la diffusion de l’innovation et des transitions. Méthode : Cette étude de trois cas se situe dans un paradigme pragmatique, avec des visées descriptive et explicative. Des stratégies de collecte de données mixtes ont été utilisées auprès de personnes provenant du contexte québécois, de la région ciblée et des cas (IPSP, médecins partenaires, DSI, DSP, gestionnaires, personnes soignées et leur famille). Résultats : L’implantation est un processus multidimensionnel, multifactoriel et évolutif. Le contexte, le déroulement, la compréhension, les acteurs et le temps sont des parties intégrantes de l’implantation et sont étroitement inter-reliés. Le déroulement de l’implantation et des transitions se produit simultanément. Discussion : Cette recherche a permis de mettre en lumière la raison pour laquelle le processus d’implantation du rôle d’IPSPL doit être considéré comme un processus complexe. Cette thèse contribue à éclairer la recherche axée sur l’efficacité en permettant de mieux comprendre les différentes composantes de l’implantation. Mots-clés : implantation, rôle, infirmière praticienne, première ligne, rural, éloigné, innovation, transition.