An interim report from the National Commission on Social Security to the President and Congress of the United States.

Cover title.

In the Supreme Court of the United States, Oct. term 1946. National Labor Relations Board, petitioner, vs. Donnelly Garment Company, a corporation; Donnelly Garment Workers' Union; and International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, respondents. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, petitioner vs. Donnelly Garment Company, Donnelly Garment Workers' Union and National Labor Relations Board, respondents. On writs of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Brief for respondent, Donnelly Garment Company.

"Table of cases": p. v-ix.

United States of America before the National Labor Relations Board, Case C-142 : in the matter of United States Steel Corporation (a New Jersey Corporation), Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corporation (a New Jersey Corporation) and Steel Workers Organizing Committee and Amalgamated Association of Iron, Steel and Tin Workers of North America.

"Exihibit B. Plans of employmee representation in effect at the plants of respondent, Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corporation"--Cover.

Nomination--National Transportation Safety Board : hearing before the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United States Senate, Ninety-seventh Congress, second session, on nomination of Adm. Donald D. Engen, to be a member, National Transportation Safety Board, June 9, 1982

"Serial no. 97-117."

Federal Communications Commission : oversight of the Wireless Carrier [i.e. Telecommunications] Bureau : hearing before the Subcommittee on Communications of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifth Congress, second session, May 13, 1998.

Shipping list no.: 2000-0011-P.

In the United States Circuit Court of Appeals in and for the Fifth Circuit, no. 8171 : Agwilines, Inc., petitioner vs. National Labor Relations Board and J. Warren Madden ... and John M. Carmody and Edwin S. Smith, respondents, review of decision of National Labor Relations Board : petition for review.

Cover title.

In the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, October term, 1936, no. 8171 : Agwilines, Inc., a corporation, petitioner v. National Labor Relation Board and J. Warren Madden ... and John M. Carmody and Edwin S. Smith, respondents : brief for the National Labor Relations Board.

Cover title.

A staff report on the National labor relations act and its administration by the National Labor Relations Board, together with supplemental views.

"Printed for use of the House Committee on Education and Labor."

The National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service : nature's scorekeepers /

Mode of access: Internet.

Government publications, their role in the national program for library and information services /

Mode of access: Internet.

Toward a national program for library and information services : goals for action /

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Vision 2020 National Parks Restoration Act : hearing before the Subcommittee on National Parks, Historic Preservation, and Recreation of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifth Congress, second session, on S. 624 ... S. 1693.

"May 7 and 14, 1998"--Pt. 2.

Social Inclusion or Market Competitiveness? A Comparison of Rural Development Policies in the European Union and the United States

The language of EU rural development policy appears more interested in social inclusion and that of US policy more interested in market competitiveness. We seek to determine why policies directed at rural development in the EU and the USA differ. In both contexts new rural development policies emphasize partnership and participation but we find local participation is used to promote social inclusion in the EU and market competitiveness in the USA. An examination of these dimensions illustrates important transcontinental differences and similarities in rural development policies. We explore the socio-historical reasons for differences in the commitment to social inclusion, while also noting similarities in the priority of market competitiveness.

Quality of Democracy in Quadruple Helix Structures: The Quality of Democracy in the United States and in Austria, Challenges and Opportunities for Development. ACES Working Papers, 2012

This contribution focuses on analyzing the quality of democracy of the United States (U.S.) and of Austria by using a comparative approach. Even though comparisons are not the only possible or legitimate method of research, this analysis is based on the opinion that comparisons provide crucial analytical perspectives and learning opportunities. Following is the proposition, put directly forward: national political systems (political systems) are comprehensively understood only by using an international comparative approach. International comparisons (of country-based systems) are common (see the status of comparative politics, for example in Sodaro, 2004). Comparisons do not have to be based necessarily on national systems alone, but can also be carried out using “within”-comparisons inside (or beyond) sub-units or regional sub-national systems, for instance the individual provinces in the case of Austria (Campbell, 2007, p. 382).

Third report on the American patent system. : Message from the President of the United States, transmitting the third report of the National patent planning commission.

Mode of access: Internet.