Safety of a new algorithm for the management of childhood illness (Almanach) to improve quality of care and rational use of drugs

Introduction New evidence from randomized controlled and etiology of fever studies, the availability of reliable RDT for malaria, and novel technologies call for revision of the IMCI strategy. We developed a new algorithm based on (i) a systematic review of published studies assessing the safety and appropriateness of RDT and antibiotic prescription, (ii) results from a clinical and microbiological investigation of febrile children aged <5 years, (iii) international expert IMCI opinions. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of the new algorithm among patients in urban and rural areas of Tanzania.Materials and Methods The design was a controlled noninferiority study. Enrolled children aged 2-59 months with any illness were managed either by a study clinician using the new Almanach algorithm (two intervention health facilities), or clinicians using standard practice, including RDT (two control HF). At day 7 and day 14, all patients were reassessed. Patients who were ill in between or not cured at day 14 were followed until recovery or death. Primary outcome was rate of complications, secondary outcome rate of antibiotic prescriptions.Results 1062 children were recruited. Main diagnoses were URTI 26%, pneumonia 19% and gastroenteritis (9.4%). 98% (531/541) were cured at D14 in the Almanach arm and 99.6% (519/521) in controls. Rate of secondary hospitalization was 0.2% in each. One death occurred in controls. None of the complications was due to withdrawal of antibiotics or antimalarials at day 0. Rate of antibiotic use was 19% in the Almanach arm and 84% in controls.Conclusion Evidence suggests that the new algorithm, primarily aimed at the rational use of drugs, is as safe as standard practice and leads to a drastic reduction of antibiotic use. The Almanach is currently being tested for clinician adherence to proposed procedures when used on paper or a mobile phone

Characteristics and quality of care of diabetic patients residing int the canton of Vaud

Introduction: Within the framework of the «Programme cantonal Diabète», we aimed at collecting data to 1) describe the population of diabetic patients in the canton of Vaud, and 2) assess the quality of their care. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the fall of 2011. Out of 140 randomly selected community pharmacies registered in the canton of Vaud, 56 accepted to participate in patients' recruitment. Noninstitutionalized adult diabetic patients (disease duration >12 months) visiting a pharmacy with a prescription for oral anti-diabetic drugs, insulin, glycemic strips or glucose meter were eligible. Patients not residing in the canton of Vaud, not speaking and understanding French well enough, presenting obvious cognitive impairment, and women with gestational diabetes, were excluded. Using a self-administered questionnaire, data was collected on patients' characteristics and diabetes as well as various process (e.g. recommended annual screenings) and outcomes quality of care indicators. Descriptive analyses were performed. Results: A total of 406 patients with diabetes participated. Mean age was 64 years, 41% were women and 63% were married. Patients reported type 1, 2 and other types of diabetes in 13%, 69% and 19%, respectively. They were treated with oral anti-diabetic drugs, insulin or both in 50%, 23% and 27% of the cases. Half of the patients did not report any diabetes-related complication. Glucose self-monitoring was reported by 82% of the patients. Of those who were aware of HbA1C (n = 218), 98% reported at least one HbA1C control during the last 12 months. During that same time frame, 97% and 95% reported at least one blood pressure and weight measure, 94% reported having had a cholesterol check, 74%, 68% and 64% had eyes, feet and urine screening respectively. 62% of the patients had been immunized against influenza. At least 76% of the patients had a minimum of 5 of the 7 described process indicators performed during the last 12 months. Among patients who knew the value (n = 145), mean HbA1C was 7.4 (SD 1.2). Conclusion: This study targeting community-based diabetic patients shows that while routine clinical and laboratory tests were annually performed in the vast majority of patients, feet and urine screening, as well as influenza immunization, were less often reported by patients. The proportion of patients with diabetes having had at least 5 out of the 7 annual screenings performed was nevertheless very high.

A high-resolution anatomical atlas of the transcriptome in the mouse embryo.

Ascertaining when and where genes are expressed is of crucial importance to understanding or predicting the physiological role of genes and proteins and how they interact to form the complex networks that underlie organ development and function. It is, therefore, crucial to determine on a genome-wide level, the spatio-temporal gene expression profiles at cellular resolution. This information is provided by colorimetric RNA in situ hybridization that can elucidate expression of genes in their native context and does so at cellular resolution. We generated what is to our knowledge the first genome-wide transcriptome atlas by RNA in situ hybridization of an entire mammalian organism, the developing mouse at embryonic day 14.5. This digital transcriptome atlas, the Eurexpress atlas (http://www.eurexpress.org), consists of a searchable database of annotated images that can be interactively viewed. We generated anatomy-based expression profiles for over 18,000 coding genes and over 400 microRNAs. We identified 1,002 tissue-specific genes that are a source of novel tissue-specific markers for 37 different anatomical structures. The quality and the resolution of the data revealed novel molecular domains for several developing structures, such as the telencephalon, a novel organization for the hypothalamus, and insight on the Wnt network involved in renal epithelial differentiation during kidney development. The digital transcriptome atlas is a powerful resource to determine co-expression of genes, to identify cell populations and lineages, and to identify functional associations between genes relevant to development and disease.

An international validation study of the EORTC brain cancer module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) for assessing health-related quality of life and symptoms in brain cancer patients.

Aims: The psychometric properties of the EORTC QLQ-BN20, a brain cancer-specific HRQOL questionnaire, have been previously determined in an English-speaking sample of patients. This study examined the validity and reliability of the questionnaire in a multi-national, multi-lingual study. Methods: QLQ-BN20 data were selected from two completed phase III EORTC/NCIC clinical trials in brain cancer (N=891), including 12 languages. Experimental treatments were surgery followed by radiotherapy (RT) and adjuvant PCV chemotherapy or surgery followed by concomitant RT plus temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy and adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy. Standard treatment consisted of surgery and postoperative RT alone. The psychometrics of the QLQ-BN20 were examined by means of multi-trait scaling analyses, reliability estimation, known groups validity testing, and responsiveness analysis. Results: All QLQ-BN20 items correlated more strongly with their own scale (r>0.70) than with other QLQ-BN20 scales. Internal consistency reliability coefficients were high (all alpha0.70). Known-groups comparisons yielded positive results, with the QLQ-BN20 distinguishing between patients with differing levels of performance status and mental functioning. Responsiveness of the questionnaire to changes over time was acceptable. Conclusion: The QLQ-BN20 demonstrates adequate psychometric properties and can be recommended for use in conjunction with the QLQ-C30 in assessing the HRQOL of brain cancer patients in international studies.

Correlating trainees' translating performance with the quality of their metacognitive self-evaluation

This paper presents a study of correlations between the performance of trainee translators, according to their teacher’s assessment, and the quality of their self-evaluation, according to their answers to metacognitive questionnaires. Two case-studies of two consecutive editions of a course in general translation from German into Spanish are dealt with. The course involved the use of post-translation metacognitive questionnaires designed to help trainees to evaluate their translating. A selection of the questionnaires (from the strongest and the weakest performances by students for each course edition) is considered. The study focuses on one item in these questionnaires that has to do with identifying translation problems and justifying their solutions. An interpretive analysis of the trainees’ answers for this questionnaire item reveals that the best-performing students were more strategically and translationally aware in self-evaluating their own translating. Our conclusions are based on considering six parameters from the analysis of the trainees’ answers, which are tentatively regarded as indicative of the quality of their self-evaluation.