Sartre et la conscience malheureuse

Paris

Le “Mal radical” et la critique kantienne du christianisme

Dekalb, Illinois

Le néant dans L’Etre et le Néant et la Critique de la raison pure

info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Le morphème "si" et la logique formelle

info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Un nouveau regard sur la tuberculose latente et la réactivation, implications pour le diagnostic et la vaccination

info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Effet du bromouracile sur la synthèse et la structure des protéines de phages

Doctorat en Sciences

Maurice Sartre. Inscriptions grecques et latines de la Syrie. Tome XXI. Inscriptions de la Jordanie. Tome IV. Pétra et la Nabatène méridionale du wadi al-Hasa au golfe de 'Aqaba

info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Devoir de mémoire contre droit à l'imagination?:La querelle des historiens et des romanciers et la Seconde Guerre mondiale

conference paper given in Maynooth (History conference 18th 20th October 2013)

Faire parler les morts. Sur Jan Karski et la controverse Lanzmann-Haenel

The Second World War has inspired many French novelists since 1945. Yet, very few of these novels have been harshly criticized by either historians or other critics, Les Bienveillantes (2006) by Jonathan Littell and Jan Karski (2009) by Yannick Haenel being two notable exceptions. This article revisits the controversy between the novelist Yannick Haenel and the critic and film-maker Claude Lanzmann. First, it shows that the important questions raised by Lanzmann are not void of ambiguity, notably because key terms at the heart of this controversy (truth, fiction or even history) were used loosely. Second, this article compares the documentary Le Rapport Karski (2010) to other texts written by Karski and to the full transcription of the interview he gave to Lanzmann in 1978: it shows how Lanzmann's 2010 documentary distorts Karski's testimony to make it comply with historical perspectives that most historians would agree with today. Finally, the author of this article regrets that this controversy did not allow the debate to move beyond the military non-intervention of the Allies.