THE CITADEL THE MILITARY COLLEGE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANNUAL REPORT 1991-1992

South Carolina laws require that each state agency submit an annual accountability report to the Governor and General Assembly that contains the agency's or department's mission, objectives to accomplish the mission, and performance measures that show the degree to which objectives are being met.

THE CITADEL THE MILITARY COLLEGE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANNUAL REPORT 1992-1993

South Carolina laws require that each state agency submit an annual accountability report to the Governor and General Assembly that contains the agency's or department's mission, objectives to accomplish the mission, and performance measures that show the degree to which objectives are being met.

SOUTH CAROLINA STATISTICAL ABSTRACT 1992

The South Carolina Budget and Control Board, Office of Research and Statistics annually published Statistical Abstracts, a comprehensive, single-source reference of demographic and economic data pertinent to the state. This publication is now an online publication by the South Carolina Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office.

1992 CRIME IN SOUTH CAROLINA

The South Carolina State Law Enforcement Division publishes Crime in South Carolina, an annual report that provides general information about crime trends, provides crime data at the county level for the most recent year available, compares national and state crime trends and provides descriptive information about crime.

The sectionalism of the tariff bill. Speech of Hon. John L. McLaurin, of South Carolina, in the Senate of the United States

This document contains a speech by John L. McLaurin, representative of South Carolina. Sections of the speech include: sectionalism exposed, the bill might have been defeated, the south plundered of its rights, not a protectionist, fraudulent demands of New England, Hon. Randolph Tucker, Hon. W.R. Morrison, and Hon. R.Q. Mills strangers to the doctrine in 1882, a tariff for revenue against the doctrine of free raw material, don’t want Cleveland’s interpretation, contest of schedules, and my remedy.

Speech of Hon. John Lowndes McLaurin, of South Carolina, in the Senate of the United States, Monday, December 9, 1901

This document contains a speech by John L. McLaurin of South Carolina presented in the Senate of the United States. Sections of the speech include: sectionalism the cause, conditions in South Carolina, the federal administration in South Carolina, should not array class against class, freedom of thought and speech, the issues, under caucus dictation the Senate no longer a deliberative body, the beginning of the fight, matter of arraying class against class, freedom of thought and speech, and issues.

Reaching for Higher Standards: 1992 South Carolina Reports on Progress Toward the National Education Goals

Document outlines how South Carolina can achieve national educational goals.

Speech of Hon. John Lowndes McLaurin, of South Carolina, in the Senate of the United States, Monday, December 9, 1901

This speech is to address the statement that Mr. McLaurin has been excluded from the caucuses of his party and thus that he will be without assignment on any committee. He goes on to explain his exclusion and defend his views that led to his exclusion.

The letters of Lowndes, addressed to the Hon. John C. Calhoun

This document contains an address to John C. Calhoun about various points that they disagree on and why.

Sexe de l’enfant et investissement parental: le cas d’Haïti

Bon nombre d’études révèlent que, dans les pays en développement, la préférence des parents pour un sexe en particulier les pousse souvent à traiter leurs enfants inéquitablement. Pour déterminer si ce phénomène existe en Haïti, cette étude s’inspire des travaux de Barcellos et al. (2014) sur les parents indiens dont les résultats, obtenus à partir des données d’enquête démographique et de santé (DHS 1992), suggèrent une discrimination au détriment des filles. Cette discrimination a lieu au niveau du temps et des ressources consacrés à prendre soin de l’enfant suite à sa naissance. Les résultats obtenus à l’aide des données nationales révèlent qu’en 1994, parmi les variables d’intérêt (allaitement, immunisation, vitamine A), seule la probabilité d’allaitement semble varier par sexe en faveur des garçons en Haïti. Tout nouveau-né de sexe masculin a une probabilité de 3,2 points de pourcentage plus élevée d’être allaité que le sexe opposé. Des données plus récentes révèlent que le sexe de l’enfant n’a aucun impact sur la probabilité d’être allaité en 2000. Par contre, en 2005 l’effet de cette probabilité est contraire à celui observé en 1994. En l’occurrence, si le nouveau-né est de sexe féminin elle a 2,4 points de pourcentage de plus que les garçons d’être allaité. De plus, considérant les enfants de 0 à 59 mois, les estimations révèlent qu’en 2005 la durée de l’allaitement augmente de 11,2% si l’enfant est une fille. Mots clés: Investissement, Haïti, enfant, sexe, allaitement, mère, immunisation, anthropométrie, 1994, 2000, 2005.

Soiree Musicale de Milhaud, January 9, 1992

Concert Program for Soiree Musicale de Milhaud, January 9, 1992

John Buttrick, Faculty Recital, January 7, 1966

Concert Program for John Buttrick, Faculty Recital, January 7, 1966

John T. Moore, Pianist, April 10, 1949

Concert Program for John T. Moore, Pianist, April 10, 1994

Handling the transfer of power: a note on the 1964 origins of the Douglas‐Home rules

Opposition is rarely a good preparation for government. The only post‐war government to enter office confident, well‐acquainted with the Civil Service and with a fund of administrative experience to draw on was the Attlee administration formed in 1945. The longer a party spends in opposition the more these assets disappear. Labour, by the end of the long period of Conservative rule in 1951–64, was largely unfamiliar with the burdens of office. This formed the background to the formulation of the Douglas‐Home rules, whereby informal contact is permitted between the Civil Service and the Opposition in advance of a general election. Since 1964 this arrangement has gradually become more extensive (especially after Neil Kinnock complained that the period for contact was too brief during the run‐up to the 1992 election) and more formalised. In late 1993 John Major agreed that contacts could be made from early 1996 in advance of the next election, rather than only during the last six months of a parliament, as had by then become the convention.’ The object of this short paper is, however, to explain how these rules originated.