1000 resultados para Farricelli, Alessandro R.


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Wybory do Dumy PaÅ„stwowej z 2007 r. nie zmieniÅ‚y ukÅ‚adu siÅ‚ politycznych. SkÅ‚ad parlamentu pozostaÅ‚ prawie takim, jaki byÅ‚ przed wyborami. Jednak wyniki byÅ‚y dość ważne jako Å›wiadectwo stabilizacji systemu politycznego: kompozycja siÅ‚ politycznych pozostaÅ‚a niezmieniona. Znaczenie Dumy, powoÅ‚anej w toku wybo³w z grudnia 2007 r., prawdopodobnie bÄ™dzie sÅ‚abÅ‚o. Parlament staÅ‚ siÄ™ jeszcze mniej samodzielny, jeszcze bardziej posÅ‚uszny wobec wÅ‚adzy wykonawczej. Można nawet pokusić siÄ™ o stwierdzenie, że Duma rosyjska coraz to bardziej przypomina RadÄ™ NaczelnÄ… ZSRR do roku 1989.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Funeral sermon

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

http://www.archive.org/details/amongsiouxstoryo00cresiala

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

http://www.canadiana.org/ECO/ItemRecord/30577 View document online

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

http://www.archive.org/details/makingofmodernmi011868mbp

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

http://www.archive.org/details/callofwatersstud01crowrich

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

http://www.archive.org/details/missionaryheroin00pitmuoft

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

http://www.archive.org/details/thesaenkhyaaphor00kapiuoft

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The hydrodynamic structure of an axisymmetric supersonic expansion can be regarded as a series of concentric divergent cones, with decreasing particle densities as the cone angle increases. Different groups of molecules therefore contribute to high-resolution absorption line shapes when optically probing the expansion in a direction perpendicular to the jet axis. These groups are distinguished by the cone angle, inducing a specific Doppler shift, and by the particle density, contributing a specific weight to the absorption intensity. As a result different broader line profiles are observed compared to room temperature spectra. This effect is investigated here selecting as the working example the R(0), ν3 absorption line in N2O recorded using a Fourier transform interferometer. Independent impact pressure and quadrupole mass spectrometric measurements are performed leading to two complementary maps of the expansion, allowing the recorded absorption line shape to be quantitatively modeled. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The costs of developing the types of new drugs that have been pursued by traditional pharmaceutical firms have been estimated in a number of studies. However, similar analyses have not been published on the costs of developing the types of molecules on which biotech firms have focused. This study represents a first attempt to get a sense for the magnitude of the R&D costs associated with the discovery and development of new therapeutic biopharmaceuticals (specifically, recombinant proteins and monoclonal antibodies [mAbs]). We utilize drug-specific data on cash outlays, development times, and success in obtaining regulatory marketing approval to estimate the average pre-tax R&D resource cost for biopharmaceuticals up to the point of initial US marketing approval (in year 2005 dollars). We found average out-of-pocket (cash outlay) cost estimates per approved biopharmaceutical of $198 million, $361 million, and $559 million for the preclinical period, the clinical period, and in total, respectively. Including the time costs associated with biopharmaceutical R&D, we found average capitalized cost estimates per approved biopharmaceutical of $615 million, $626 million, and $1241 million for the preclinical period, the clinical period, and in total, respectively. Adjusting previously published estimates of R&D costs for traditional pharmaceutical firms by using past growth rates for pharmaceutical company costs to correspond to the more recent period to which our biopharmaceutical data apply, we found that total out-of-pocket cost per approved biopharmaceutical was somewhat lower than for the pharmaceutical company data ($559 million vs $672 million). However, estimated total capitalized cost per approved new molecule was nearly the same for biopharmaceuticals as for the adjusted pharmaceutical company data ($1241 million versus $1318 million). The results should be viewed with some caution for now given a limited number of biopharmaceutical molecules with data on cash outlays, different therapeutic class distributions for biopharmaceuticals and for pharmaceutical company drugs, and uncertainty about whether recent growth rates in pharmaceutical company costs are different from immediate past growth rates. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.