Prevalence of Erectile Dysfunction as Defined by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Self-Reported Erectile Dysfunction in a Sample of Brazilian Men Who Consider Themselves Healthy

A cross-sectional study was carried out with 288 male blood donors, aged between 40 and 60 years old, with the aim of comparing the prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) as defined by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and that resulting from the simple questioning of the presence of ED. Socio-demographic, clinical, and behavioral factors that are associated with the presence of ED were considered. Erectile dysfunction prevalence in the IIEF was 31.9%, while self-reported ED prevalence was 3.1%. The factors associated to ED, as reported by the IIEF were: professional inactivity, suspected depression and/or anxiety, reduced sexual desired, and self-reported ED.

Sexual satisfaction among patients with erectile dysfunction treated with counseling, sildenafil, or both

Introduction. Sexual satisfaction is linked to life satisfaction, and erectile dysfunction (ED) may lead to an impaired quality of life (QOL). Aim. Our goal was to evaluate the QOL among Brazilian patients with ED, before and after three kinds of treatment. Methods. Men aged 25-55 years, with a diagnosis of psychogenic or mixed ED, according to the Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition, and the Standard Practice in Sexual Medicine, were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: counseling, sildenafil, and sildenafil plus counseling. At baseline each group had 40 patients. Sildenafil was provided in 50 mg that could be adjusted to 100 mg. The patients could initially take one to two tablets per week and the entire treatment lasted for 3 months. Counseling was provided in group sessions that took place once a week. They were evaluated at baseline and after 3 months of treatment with the Male Sexual Quotient (MSQ) and the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM). Main Outcome Measures. The correlation between the patients` MSQ score and scores on the SHIM. Results. One hundred seventeen patients were enrolled. The three groups were similar according to age, marital status, mean time of ED, and ED severity and etiology. At baseline, MSQ and SHIM total scores were not different among the three groups. MSQ scores increased from 41.2 +/- 15.3, 38.7 +/- 18.0, and 46.8 +/- 17.0 to 48.5 +/- 15.3, 63.8 +/- 21.6, and 70.0 +/- 17.3 after counseling, sildenafil, and sildenafil plus counseling, respectively (P < 0.05). SHIM scores also increased significantly (9.6 +/- 4.1, 9.7 +/- 4.1, and 10.2 +/- 3.9 to 12.1 +/- 3.9, 16.7 +/- 5.6, and 17.7 +/- 4.5 after counseling, sildenafil, and sildenafil plus counseling, respectively) (P < 0.05). There were no serious adverse events related to sildenafil, and no patient was withdrawn from the study because of an adverse event. Conclusions. The three treatments were significantly efficient, and the best treatment was sildenafil associated with counseling.