920 resultados para Intervention with caretakers
Resumo:
PURPOSE: Patients with magnetic resonance (MR)-negative focal epilepsy (MRN-E) have less favorable surgical outcomes (between 40% and 70%) compared to those in whom an MRI lesion guides the site of surgical intervention (60-90%). Patients with extratemporal MRN-E have the worst outcome (around 50% chance of seizure freedom). We studied whether electroencephalography (EEG) source imaging (ESI) of interictal epileptic activity can contribute to the identification of the epileptic focus in patients with normal MRI. METHODS: We carried out ESI in 10 operated patients with nonlesional MRI and a postsurgical follow-up of at least 1 year. Five of the 10 patients had extratemporal lobe epilepsy. Evaluation comprised surface and intracranial EEG monitoring of ictal and interictal events, structural MRI, [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), ictal and interictal perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scans. Eight of the 10 patients also underwent intracranial monitoring. RESULTS: ESI correctly localized the epileptic focus within the resection margins in 8 of 10 patients, 9 of whom experienced favorable postsurgical outcomes. DISCUSSION: The results highlight the diagnostic value of ESI and encourage broadening its application to patients with MRN-E. If the surface EEG contains fairly localized spikes, ESI contributes to the presurgical decision process.
Resumo:
Résumé La levodopa (LD) est le traitement antiparkinsonien le plus efficace et le plus répandu. Son effet est composé d'une réponse de courte (quelques heures) et de longue durée (jours à semaines). La persistance de cette dernière dans les phases avancées de la maladie de Parkinson est controversée, et sa mesure directe n'a jamais été faite en raison des risques liés à un sevrage complet de LD. La stimulation du noyau sous-thalamique est un nouveau traitement neurochirurgical de la maladie de Parkinson, indiqué dans les formes avancées, qui permet l'arrêt complet du traitement médicamenteux chez certains patients. Nous avons étudié 30 patients qui ont bénéficié d'une telle stimulation, et les avons évalués avant l'intervention sans médicaments, et à 6 mois postopératoires, sans médicaments et sans stimulation. Chez 19 patients, la médication a pu être complètement arrêtée, alors qu'elle a dû être réintroduite chez les 11 patients restants. Au cours des 6 mois qui ont suivi l'intervention, le parkinsonisme s'est aggravé de façon significative dans le groupe sans LD, et non dans le groupe avec LD. Cette différence d'évolution s'explique par la perte de l'effet à long terme de la LD dans le groupe chez qui ce médicament a pu être arrêté. En comparant cette aggravation à la magnitude de l'effet à court terme, la réponse de longue durée correspond environ à 80 pourcent de la réponse de courte durée, et elle lui est inversement corrélée. Parmi les signes cardinaux de la maladie, la réponse de longue durée affecte surtout la bradycinésie et la rigidité, mais pas le tremblement ni la composante axiale. La comparaison du parkinsonisme avec traitement (stimulation et LD si applicable) ne montre aucune différence d'évolution entre les 2 groupes, suggérant que la stimulation compense tant la réponse de courte que de longue durée. Notre travail montre que la réponse de longue durée à la LD demeure significative chez les patients parkinsoniens après plus de 15 ans d'évolution, et suggère que la stimulation du noyau sous-thalamique compense les réponses de courte et de longue durée. Abstract Background: Long duration response to levodopa is supposed to decrease with Parkinson's disease (PD) progression, but direct observation of this response in advanced PD has never been performed. Objective: To study the long duration response to levodopa in advanced PD patients treated with subthalamic deep-brain stimulation. Design and settings: We studied 30 consecutive PD patients who underwent subthalamic deep-brain stimulation. One group had no antiparkinsonian treatment since surgery (no levodopa), while medical treatment had to be reinitiated in the other group (levodopa). Main outcome measures: motor Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). Results: In comparison with preoperative assessment, evaluation six months postoperatively with stimulation turned off for three hours found a worsening of the motor part of UPDRS in the no-levodopa group. This worsening being absent in the levodopa group, it most probably reflected the loss of the long duration response to levodopa in the no-levodopa group. Stimulation turned on, postoperative motor UPDRS in both groups were similar to preoperative on medication scores, suggesting that subthalamic deep-brain stimulation compensated for both the short and long duration responses to levodopa. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the long duration response to levodopa remains significant even in advanced PD, and that subthalamic deep-brain stimulation compensates for both the short and the long duration resposes to levodopa.
Resumo:
BACKGROUND: To ensure vaccines safety, given the weaknesses of the national pharmacovigilance system in Cameroon, there is a need to identify effective interventions that can contribute to improving AEFI reporting. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of: (i) sending weekly SMS, or (ii) weekly supervisory visits on AEFI reporting rate during a meningitis immunization campaign conducted in Cameroon in 2012 using the meningitis A conjugate vaccine (MenAfriVac?). METHODS: Health facilities that met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to receive: (i) a weekly standardized SMS, (ii) a weekly standardized supervisory visits or (iii) no intervention. The primary outcome was the reported AEFI incidence rate from week 5 to 8 after the immunization campaign. Poisson regression model was used to estimate the effect of interventions after adjusting for health region, type of health facility, type and position of health workers as well as the cumulative number of AEFI reported from weeks 1 to 4. RESULTS: A total of 348 (77.2%) of 451 health facility were included, and 116 assigned to each of three groups. The incidence rate of reported AEFI per 100 health facility per week was 20.0 (15.9-24.1) in the SMS group, 40.2 (34.4-46.0) in supervision group and 13.6 (10.1-16.9) in the control group. Supervision led to a significant increase of AEFI reporting rate compared to SMS [adjusted RR=2.1 (1.6-2.7); p<0.001] and control [RR=2.8(2.1-3.7); p<0.001)] groups. The effect of SMS led to some increase in AEFI reporting rate compared to the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant [RR=1.4(0.8-1.6); p=0.07)]. CONCLUSION: Supervision was more effective than SMS or routine surveillance in improving AEFI reporting rate. It should be part of any AEFI surveillance system. SMS could be useful in improving AEFI reporting rates but strategies need to be found to improve its effectiveness, and thus maximize its benefits.
Resumo:
It has been shown that for the reaction catalyzed by "biodegradative" L-threonine dehydratase from E. coli strains K-12 and 980 in 0.5 M phosphate-carbonate buffer, pH 8.4 and pH 9.5, the plots of initial reaction rate (v) versus the initial substrate concentration ([S]0 are characterized by several inflection points, i. e. an intermediate plateau. The plot of v versus the allosteric activator (AMP) concentration have very complicated shapes: there are several inflection points, and also the maximum at L-threonine concentration equal to 3-10(2) and 5-10(-2) M. High AMP concentrations inhibit the enzyme at high substrate concentrations. The reduced glutathion dose not influence the enzyme and does not alter the activating effect of AMP. On the basis of the data obtained it is proposed that the substrate and AMP shift the equilibrium between multiple oligomeric enzyme forms differing in catalytic activity and kinetic manifestations of allosteric interactions between the active and allosteric AMP-binding sites towards polymerization. Thus, the functioning the enzyme under study is discussed in the frames of the model of dissociating regulatory enzymes with multiple intermediate oligomeric forms.
Resumo:
BACKGROUND: Enteral nutrition (EN) is recommended for patients in the intensive-care unit (ICU), but it does not consistently achieve nutritional goals. We assessed whether delivery of 100% of the energy target from days 4 to 8 in the ICU with EN plus supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) could optimise clinical outcome. METHODS: This randomised controlled trial was undertaken in two centres in Switzerland. We enrolled patients on day 3 of admission to the ICU who had received less than 60% of their energy target from EN, were expected to stay for longer than 5 days, and to survive for longer than 7 days. We calculated energy targets with indirect calorimetry on day 3, or if not possible, set targets as 25 and 30 kcal per kg of ideal bodyweight a day for women and men, respectively. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated randomisation sequence to receive EN or SPN. The primary outcome was occurrence of nosocomial infection after cessation of intervention (day 8), measured until end of follow-up (day 28), analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00802503. FINDINGS: We randomly assigned 153 patients to SPN and 152 to EN. 30 patients discontinued before the study end. Mean energy delivery between day 4 and 8 was 28 kcal/kg per day (SD 5) for the SPN group (103% [SD 18%] of energy target), compared with 20 kcal/kg per day (7) for the EN group (77% [27%]). Between days 9 and 28, 41 (27%) of 153 patients in the SPN group had a nosocomial infection compared with 58 (38%) of 152 patients in the EN group (hazard ratio 0·65, 95% CI 0·43-0·97; p=0·0338), and the SPN group had a lower mean number of nosocomial infections per patient (-0·42 [-0·79 to -0·05]; p=0·0248). INTERPRETATION: Individually optimised energy supplementation with SPN starting 4 days after ICU admission could reduce nosocomial infections and should be considered as a strategy to improve clinical outcome in patients in the ICU for whom EN is insufficient. FUNDING: Foundation Nutrition 2000Plus, ICU Quality Funds, Baxter, and Fresenius Kabi.