Los derechos de propiedad intelectual como restricción a la competencia económica (Tema Central)

Este trabajo explora, de manera introductoria, una de las temáticas de mayor vigencia: la intersección entre los regímenes de propiedad intelectual y competencia económica. Los temas que trata son: el fundamento de la existencia de los derechos de propiedad intelectual según los objetivos perseguidos por el derecho de la competencia, la naturaleza jurídica de estos derechos vista asimismo desde el régimen de la concurrencia, las particularidades que la presencia de estos derechos introduce en los análisis que la aplicación de la legislación de la competencia requiere, las prácticas anticoncurrenciales que pueden realizarse a través del ejercicio de estos derechos y, por último, las medidas frente a este ejercicio.

TLC: Amazonía, pueblos indígenas y biodiversidad (Tema Central)

Este artículo hace un análisis sobre los problemas y desafíos que la firma de tratados de libre comercio plantea a los pueblos indígenas, específicamente a los pueblos amazónicos. Tres ámbitos de análisis son utilizados por el autor para presentar la temática: la disputa por el control de la biodiversidad, los derechos de los pueblos indígenas y la construcción de una agenda de debate frente a la actual coyuntura. Ortiz plantea que si los tratados de libre comercio son parte de la política hegemónica de Estados Unidos, basada en el establecimiento de un orden global y en el control de las fuentes de energía del planeta, la cuenca amazónica se ubica como unas de las áreas de interés para los capitales multinacionales.

Nuevas exigencias de los Estados Unidos bajo el Tratado de Libre Comercio: las patentes farmacéuticas (Tema Central)

La autora analiza las principales exigencias que en materia de propiedad intelectual Estados Unidos hace al Ecuador en el marco de la firma del Tratado de Libre Comercio. Estas exigencias, señala, van más allá de la normatividad sobre propiedad intelectual ya que los países andinos cuentan con este tipo de normas, altamente funcionales a los intereses de las transnacionales farmacéuticas. Cuatro son los ámbitos en los que se ubican las exigencias norteamericanas en la materia: protección con derecho de exclusividad a la información no divulgada, condicionamiento al ejercicio de las licencias obligatorias, ampliación del tiempo de protección a las patentes y los segundos usos, y eliminación de las exclusiones a la patentabilidad. Finalmente señala que el debate sobre propiedad intelectual, más allá de su apariencia técnica, es un debate esencialmente político.

Los derechos de propiedad intelectual en la geopolítica del saber de la sociedad global del conocimiento (Tema Central)

En este texto se analiza el significado que desde el punto de vista de la geopolítica del saber tienen los nuevos regímenes transnacionales de protección de la propiedad intelectual que se han venido estableciendo en los últimos años como parte del orden institucional y jurídico de la sociedad global. Se hace énfasis particular en la oposición de intereses existentes en este ámbito entre las empresas transnacionales y los habitantes del Sur del planeta.

Importación paralela de productos farmacéuticos como un problema entre derechos de propiedad intelectual y derecho de la competencia de la Comunidad Andina y la Unión Europea (Tema Central)

La importación paralela de medicinas dentro de una comunidad es una operación comercial que se desarrolla en el límite del Derecho a la competencia y el Derecho de propiedad intelectual. El presente artículo analiza la importación paralela de medicinas dentro del derecho de la Unión Europea (UE) y la compara con la norma andina que regula la competencia en la Comunidad Andina (CAN). Finalmente analiza las perspectivas en las relaciones entre estos dos procesos de integración desde el punto de vista del Derecho de la competencia.

Impuestos locales a las transferencias de dominio de bienes inmuebles (Tema Central)

Este artículo versa sobre los impuestos municipales y metropolitanos a la transferencia de dominio de bienes inmuebles en el contexto ecuatoriano como parte de la tributación local, y examina con un enfoque teórico los elementos cardinales de esta específica imposición, así como de aspectos formales y de gestión, a remolque del marco normativo vigente. En esta línea se exponen algunas inconsistencias del régimen jurídico de la materia con el correlativo planteamiento de varios supuestos que podrían considerarse para la depuración del régimen en cuestión.

ICT for growth: a targeted approach. Bruegel Policy Contribution 2012/10, June 2012

This Policy Contribution assesses the broad obstacles hampering ICT-led growth in Europe and identifies the main areas in which policy could unlock the greatest value. We review estimates of the value that could be generated through take-up of various technologies and carry out a broad matching with policy areas. According to the literature survey and the collected estimates, the areas in which the right policies could unlock the greatest ICT-led growth are product and labour market regulations and the European Single Market. These areas should be reformed to make European markets more flexible and competitive. This would promote wider adoption of modern data-driven organisational and management practices thereby helping to close the productivity gap between the United States and the European Union. Gains could also be made in the areas of privacy, data security, intellectual property and liability pertaining to the digital economy, especially cloud computing, and next generation network infrastructure investment. Standardisation and spectrum allocation issues are found to be important, though to a lesser degree. Strong complementarities between the analysed technologies suggest, however, that policymakers need to deal with all of the identified obstacles in order to fully realise the potential of ICT to spur long-term growth beyond the partial gains that we report.

New ICT sectors: platforms for European growth? Bruegel Policy Contribution 2012/14, August 2012

Europe's failure to specialise in new ICT sectors and firms is likely to hold back Europe’s post-crisis recovery. Europe lacks in particular leading platform providers, who are capturing most of the value in the new ICT ecosystem. • In-depth analysis of some specific new emerging ICT sectors shows that the problem in Europe appears not to be so much in the generation of new ideas, but rather in bringing ideas successfully to market. Among the barriers are the lack of a single digital market, fragmented intellectual property regimes, lack of an entrepreneurial culture, limited access to risk capital and an absence of ICT clusters. • The EU policy framework, particularly the Innovation Union and Digital Agenda EU 2020 Flagships, could better leverage the growth power for Europe of new ICT markets. The emphasis should move beyond providing support for infrastructure and research, to funding programmes for pre-commercial projects. But perhaps most important is dealing with the fragmentation in European digital markets.

Concentration in the ownership of plant variety rights: Some implications for developing countries

This paper explores concentration levels in the ownership of intellectual property rights over plant varieties worldwide. An analysis of data for 30 UPOV member-countries shows a high degree of concentration in the ownership of plant variety rights for six major crops at the national level in the developed world. Much of this concentration has arisen owing to the rapid consolidation of the seed industry through mergers and acquisitions, especially in the 1990s. A high degree of concentration in the ownership of plant variety rights, in combination with recent efforts to strengthen plant variety protection regimes, is likely to have significant effects on the prospects for future innovation in plant breeding and the distribution of market power between companies. For developing countries, concentration in intellectual property right ownership may have important implications for the structure of domestic seed industries and access to protected varieties and associated plant breeding technologies. These implications for developing countries are likely to become apparent in the context of the rapid spread of plant variety protection and access legislation, emerging changes in the international exchange regime for plant material and liberalised investment policies permitting foreign investment in the seeds sector.

Exploring the feasibility of farmers' rights

In many developing countries, there is concern that a conventional system of plant breeders' rights provides no rewards to farmers for their role in the conservation and enhancement of agro-biodiversity. To redress this imbalance, developing countries are incorporating farmers' rights provisions in their plant variety protection legislation. This article examines the feasibility of farmers' rights provisions based on intellectual property rights. It argues that the farmers' rights provisions crafted by some developing countries will involve enormous operational difficulties, while IPR-based farmers' rights are unlikely to provide significant economic returns to farmers or farming communities. At the same time, farmers' rights provisions, as currently conceived, are likely significantly to dilute the incentives for innovation provided to institutional plant breeders.

Concentration in ownership of plant variety rights: some implications for developing countries

This paper explores concentration levels in the ownership of intellectual property rights over plant varieties worldwide. An analysis of data for 30 UPOV member-countries shows a high degree of concentration in the ownership of plant variety rights for six major crops at the national level in the developed world. Much of this concentration has arisen owing to the rapid consolidation of the seed industry through mergers and acquisitions, especially in the 1990s. A high degree of concentration in the ownership of plant variety rights, in combination with recent efforts to strengthen plant variety protection regimes, is likely to have significant effects on the prospects for future innovation in plant breeding and the distribution of market power between companies. For developing countries, concentration in intellectual property right ownership may have important implications for the structure of domestic seed industries and access to protected varieties and associated plant breeding technologies. These implications for developing countries are likely to become apparent in the context of the rapid spread of plant variety protection and access legislation, emerging changes in the international exchange regime for plant material and liberalised investment policies permitting foreign investment in the seeds sector. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Plant variety protection in developing countries: A view from the private seed industry in India

Many developing countries are currently engaged in designing and implementing plant variety protection systems. Encouraging private investment in plant breeding is the key rationale for extending intellectual property rights to plant varieties. However, the design of plant variety protection systems in developing countries has been dominated by concerns regarding the inequities of a plant variety protection system, especially the imbalance in the reward structure between plant breeders and farmers. The private seed industry, a key stakeholder in plant variety protection, appears to be playing only a peripheral role in the design of the intellectual property rights regime. This paper explores the potential response of the private seed industry in India to plant variety protection legislation based on a survey of major plant breeding companies. The survey finds that the private seed industry in India is generally unenthusiastic about the legislation and plant variety protection is likely to have only a very limited impact on their research profile and expenditures on plant breeding. Measures designed to curb the 'excessive' profits of breeders, farmers' rights provisions and poor prospects for enforcement of rights are seen to be seriously diluting breeders' rights, leaving few incentives for innovation. If the fundamental objective of plant variety protection is to stimulate private investment in plant breeding, then developing countries need to seriously address the question of improving appropriability of returns from investment.

Plant variety protection, innovation, and transferability: Some empirical evidence

Under the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, all member-countries of the World Trade Organization are required to provide an "effective" system of plant variety protection within a specific time frame. In many developing countries, this has led to a divisive debate about the fundamental desirability of extending intellectual property rights to agriculture. Empirical studies on the economic impacts of plant variety protection, especially its ability to generate large private sector investments in plant breeding and to facilitate the transfer of technology, have been very limited. This paper examines two aspects of the international experience of plant variety protection: (a) the relationship between legislation, research, and development expenditures and plant variety protection grants, i.e., the innovation effect and (b) the role of plant variety protection in facilitating the flow of varieties across countries, i.e., the transferability effect.

Potential economic impacts of terminator technologies: policy implications for developing countries

The terminator gene can render seeds sterile, so forcing farmers to purchase fresh seed every year. It is a technological solution to the problem of market failure that could increase the appropriability of R&D investment more effectively than intellectual property rights legislation or patents. This paper shows that appropriability should be more than tripled and that this leads to greater private R&D investment, which may be expected to double or triple. This would bring open-pollinating varieties into line with F1 hybrids, for which seed cannot be saved. In turn, the increased investment should raise yield increases to levels similar to those for hybrid crops. Thus, there are benefits to set against the possible ecological and environmental costs and the clear distributional and social consequences. The paper discusses the way the seed market is developing, the possible impacts, especially from a developing country viewpoint, and considers the policy changes that are needed.