Clinical reasoning in undergraduate nursing education: a scoping review

Abstract OBJECTIVE This study aimed at analyzing the current state of knowledge on clinical reasoning in undergraduate nursing education. METHODS A systematic scoping review through a search strategy applied to the MEDLINE database, and an analysis of the material recovered by extracting data done by two independent reviewers. The extracted data were analyzed and synthesized in a narrative manner. RESULTS From the 1380 citations retrieved in the search, 23 were kept for review and their contents were summarized into five categories: 1) the experience of developing critical thinking/clinical reasoning/decision-making process; 2) teaching strategies related to the development of critical thinking/clinical reasoning/decision-making process; 3) measurement of variables related to the critical thinking/clinical reasoning/decision-making process; 4) relationship of variables involved in the critical thinking/clinical reasoning/decision-making process; and 5) theoretical development models of critical thinking/clinical reasoning/decision-making process for students. CONCLUSION The biggest challenge for developing knowledge on teaching clinical reasoning seems to be finding consistency between theoretical perspectives on the development of clinical reasoning and methodologies, methods, and procedures in research initiatives in this field.

Iowa Department of Education Annual Report, Agency Performance Plan, 2007

Annual Report, Agency Performance Plan

Iowa Department of Education - Iowa Public Television, Agency Performance Plan, 2007

Annual Report, Agency Performance Plan

L'enseignement du patient diabétique et son évaluation par un questionnaire à choix multiple. [Education of the diabetic patient and its evaluation by a multiple-choice questionnaire].

37 insulin-dependent and non-insulin-dependent diabetics answered a multiple-choice questionnaire during inpatient educational sessions. 12 dietetic and 12 pathophysiologic questions had to be answered. Statistical analysis of factors influencing the number of errors can be summed up as follows: there is a direct correlation between age of the patient and number of errors; the older the patient, the greater the number of errors. However, insulin-dependent diabetics committed fewer errors than non-insulin-dependent subjects of the same age, which suggests greater motivation in the first group due to their treatment. The test likewise affords the patients an opportunity of reviewing unclear topics and enables the educational team to adapt their teaching to the patients.

Audit report on the Iowa Federal Family Education Loan Program Division, a Division of the Iowa College Student Aid Commission, for the year ended June 30, 2006

Audit report on the Iowa Federal Family Education Loan Program Division, a Division of the Iowa College Student Aid Commission, for the year ended June 30, 2006

The Annual Condition of Education Report, 2000

Statistics about public edcuation in the state of Iowa including graduation rates, No Child Left Behind Act,

The Annual Condition of Education Report, 1998

Statistics about public edcuation in the state of Iowa including graduation rates, No Child Left Behind Act,

The Annual Condition of Education Report, 1999

Statistics about public edcuation in the state of Iowa including graduation rates, No Child Left Behind Act,

The Annual Condition of Education Report, 2006

Statistics about public edcuation in the state of Iowa including graduation rates, No Child Left Behind Act.

The Annual Condition of Education Report, 2001

Statistics about public edcuation in the state of Iowa including graduation rates, No Child Left Behind Act.

The Annual Condition of Education Report, 2004

Statistics about public edcuation in the state of Iowa including graduation rates, No Child Left Behind Act.

The Annual Condition of Education Report, 2005

Statistics about public edcuation in the state of Iowa including graduation rates, No Child Left Behind Act.

Audit report on the Iowa Department of Education for the year ended June 30, 2006

Audit report on the Iowa Department of Education for the year ended June 30, 2006

LSTA Five Year Plan 2008-2012, 2007

The 2008-2012 Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA) Plan represents a blueprint for the State Library of Iowa’s federally funded activities over the next five years. We feel we have been successful in striking a balance between challenging ourselves to achieve more and being realistic about what we can actually accomplish with current human and financial resources. We have incorporated “Lessons Learned” from the previous five year plan. These include: • Continue to use LSTA funding primarily for projects of statewide impact, an emphasis based on input from the Iowa library community. • Consider carefully the ramifications of taking on additional projects. We have carefully selected a few, new projects. • Leverage staff resources and non-federal funding to carry out our LSTA plan. A number of programs and services identified in the plan also use state funding, including the State Data Center, Iowa Publications Online, Direct State Aid, Open Access and Access Plus. • Measure progress regularly and frequently. We plan to review our progress in implementing the plan at least quarterly and will ask the Iowa Commission of Libraries to review progress annually. • Write objectives that come closer to identifying impact. We believe our target outcomes are do-able and come closer to measuring impact.

The State Report Card for No Child Left Behind Iowa Department of Education, December 2006

The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001 requires each state to provide an annual report card to inform stakeholders and the public about the progress of students and schools on indicators of student achievement and other information that relates to student success. The State Report Card provides state level data to serve as a comparison for schools and districts as they consider and implement improvement efforts to increase the success for all Iowa students.