912 resultados para exposition court terme
Resumo:
Hay un ejemplar encuadernado con: Romans, y coloqui nou, pera divertir el humor y desterrar la melancolia, yà que no tenim dinès ... (NP849.91/3085).
Resumo:
Hay un ejemplar encuadernado con: Coloqui nou (XVIII/F-70).
Resumo:
Con el objetivo de valorar la efectividad de la técnica de desplazamiento en porteros de fútbol y la velocidad de movimiento, se realizó un estudio con 9 porteros de fútbol juveniles de alto nivel de la cantera de un equipo de la primera división española. Se ha pretendido apoyar el trabajo del cuerpo técnico. Se realizaron tres tests, un primer Test y un Re-test para validar los datos y un Post-Test para ver la evolución de los jugadores a las seis semanas. Durante esas seis semanas, un sujeto entrenó en la herramienta de valoración. El material utilizado fue la herramienta Speed-Court. Los resultados mostraron que la técnica de desplazamiento libre siempre es más eficiente en dichos tests y que los jugadores mejoraron en uno de los test tras seis semanas de entrenamiento. El jugador que entrenó durante las seis semanas mejoró todos los resultados salvo en la técnica de portero desde atrás.
Resumo:
2
Resumo:
2
Resumo:
1
Resumo:
In February, 1937, the Court, in an opinion by Chief Justice William F. Frank, issued their verdict that supported the Missouri statute that allowed for out-of-state tuition for Missouri blacks to continue their education if the desired program was not offered at Lincoln University Once again, the legal team of Lloyd Gaines was not undaunted.
Resumo:
On December 12, 1936, Charles Hamilton Houston was in Jefferson City, Missouri arguing Gaines’ appeal in front of the Missouri Supreme Court. Houston added some teeth to his argument by adding that neither “the slender hope” that Gaines may someday attend a new law program at Lincoln nor the provision of tuition scholarships to attend an out-of-state law school met the US Constitution’s requirement of equal treatment regardless of race.
Resumo:
Two weeks later, Judge Dinwiddie issued his decision in favor of Canada and the University. Houston was expecting this and appealed to the Missouri Supreme Court.
Resumo:
Gaines’ legal team, led by Houston, had faith in the justice system of the United States and anticipated getting a fair trial at the federal level. So far, all decisions had occurred in Missouri, a state with a segregated system.The fact that Gaines v Canada had reached the Supreme Court was promising indeed. It was rare that any case involving African-Americans would be considered by the highest court in the land. President Franklin D. Roosevelt had been appointing Justices that were more willing to consider cases concerned with civil rights. On November 9, 1938, the Supreme Court of the United States heard arguments in the Gaines v Canada case. The defense was unmoved by the rude treatment and made their presentation with professionalism and aplomb. Houston’s argument remained steadfast; not only was the state of Missouri’s statute concerning out-of-state tuition for blacks in violation of the 14th Amendment, but the very idea of segregation itself violated the Constitution. William Hogsett, the attorney for the University of Missouri, countered that the school was merely following state laws. The MU legal team was flustered as questions from the bench forced them to correct overstatements regarding Missouri’s “generosity to Negro students”. With crossed fingers and high hopes, the Gaines legal team rested their case and awaited the verdict. Meanwhile, Lloyd Gaines was still in Michigan. Lloyd held a W.P.A. job as a Civil Service Clerk and was in constant contact with his family and attorneys. His mood in his correspondence was hopeful and positive.