Aviation unit and intermediate maintenance for Army UH-60A and EH-60A helicopters.

"29 August 1989"--[Vol. 6].

Aviation unit and intermediate maintenance instructions : Army model UH-1H/V/EH-1H/X helicopters.

"30 September 1987"--[Vol. 1].

Aviation unit and intermediate maintenance repair parts and special tools list (including depot maintenance repair parts and special tools) for helicopter, attack, NSN 1520-01-168-4259, AH-1P (PROD), 1520-01-192-2478, AH-1E (ECAS), 1520-01-168-4260, AH-1F (MC).

"14 April 1987"--Vol. 3.

Aviation unit and intermediate maintenance for Army UH-60A and EH-60A helicopters.

"29 August 1989."

Aviation unit and intermediate maintenance manual for Army AH-64A helicopter.

"7 June 1988."

Aviation unit and intermediate maintenance manual : Army model AH-1S (PROD), AH-1S (ECAS), AH-1S (modernized Cobra) helicopters.

"8 May 1980."

Aviation unit and intermediate maintenance for Army UH-60A and EH-60A helicopters.

"29 August 1989."

Aviation unit and intermediate maintenance repair parts and special tools list (including depot maintenance repair parts and special tools) for helicopter, utility - tactical transport, UH-1B, UH-1C, UH-1H, UH-1M, EH-1H (Bell), UH-1V, NSN 1520-00-713-9912 (UH-1B), 1520-00-997-8862 (UH-1C), 1520-00-087-7637 (UH-1H), 1520-00-809-2631 (UH-1M), 1520-00-368-8442 (EH-1H), 1520-01-043-4949 (UH-1V) [microform].

"15 March 1988"--[Vol.] 3.

Redwood National Park Boundary Adjustment Act of 2005 : report (to accompany S. 134).

"March 9, 2005."

Yuma Crossing National Heritage Area boundary modification : report (to accompany H.R. 326).

"April 20, 2006."

Aviation unit and aviation intermediate mainenance manual (including repair parts and special tools list) : test set, armament subsystem, M16 (4933-00-056-0202).

"January 1972."

The rise of modern mammalian faunas: tempo and mode of faunal turnover in western Montana during the Oligocene

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2016-06

Evaluation of the BEASY program using linear and piecewise linear approaches for the boundary conditions

The boundary element method (BEM) was used to study galvanic corrosion using linear and logarithmic boundary conditions. The linear boundary condition was implemented by using the linear approach and the piecewise linear approach. The logarithmic boundary condition was implemented by the piecewise linear approach. The calculated potential and current density distribution were compared with the prior analytical results. For the linear boundary condition, the BEASY program using the linear approach and the piecewise linear approach gave accurate predictions of the potential and the galvanic current density distributions for varied electrolyte conditions, various film thicknesses, various electrolyte conductivities and various area ratio of anode/cathode. The 50-point piecewise linear method could be used with both linear and logarithmic polarization curves.

Boundary element method predictions of the influence of the electrolyte on the galvanic corrosion of AZ91D coupled to steel

This research investigated the galvanic corrosion of the magnesium alloy AZ91D coupled to steel. The galvanic current distribution was measured in 5% NaCl solution, corrosive water and an auto coolant. The experimental measurements were compared with predictions from a Boundary Element Method (BEM) model. The boundary condition, required as an input into the BEM model, needs to be a polarization curve that accurately reflects the corrosion process. Provided that the polarization curve does reflect steady state, the BEM model is expected to be able to reflect steady state galvanic corrosion.

Woodleigh, Southern Carnarvon Basin, Western Australia: history of discovery, Late Devonian age, and geophysical and morphometric evidence for a 120 km-diameter impact structure

The discovery of the Woodleigh impact structure, first identified by R. P. lasky, bears a number of parallels with that of the Chlcxulub impact structure of K-T boundary age, underpinning complications inherent in the study of buried impact structures by geophysical techniques and drilling. Questions raised in connection with the diameter of the Woodleigh impact structure reflect uncertainties in criteria used to define original crater sizes in eroded and buried impact structures as well as limits on the geological controls at Woodleigh. The truncation of the regional Ajona - Wandagee gravity ridges by the outer aureole of the Woodleigh structure, a superposed arcuate magnetic anomaly along the eastern part of the structure, seismic-reflection data indicating a central > 37 km-diameter dome, correlation of fault patterns between Woodleigh and less-deeply eroded impact structures (Ries crater, Chesapeake Bay), and morphometric estimates all indicate a final diameter of 120 km. At Woodleigh, pre-hydrothermal shock-induced melting and diaplectic transformations are heavily masked by pervasive alteration of the shocked gneisses to montmorillonite-dominated clays, accounting for the high MgO and low K2O of cryptocrystalline components. The possible contamination of sub-crater levels of the Woodlelgh impact structure by meteoritic components, suggested by high Ni, Co, Cr, Ni/ Co and Ni/Cr ratios, requires further siderophile element analyses of vein materials. Although stratigraphic age constraints on the impact event are broad (post-Middle Devonian to pre-Early Jurassic) high-temperature (200-250 degrees C) pervasive hydrothermal activity dated by K-Ar isotopes of illite - smectite indicates an age of 359 +/- 4 Ma. To date neither Late Devonian crater fill, nor impact ejecta fallout units have been identified, although metallic meteoritic ablation spherules of a similar age have been found in the Conning Basin.