Valuing Sovereign Default Risk - A Pricing Formula and its Empirical Results for the Mexican External Debt.

Rapport de recherche

Regulatory History Material as an Extrinsic Aid to Interpretation: An Empirical Study on the Use of RIAS by the Federal Court of Canada

Since 1986, the Canadian Public Administration is required to analyze the socio-economic impact of new regulatory requirements or regulatory changes. To report on its analysis, a Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement (RIAS) is produced and published in the Canada Gazette with the proposed regulation to which it pertains for notice to, and comments by, interested parties. After the allocated time for comments has elapsed, the regulation is adopted with a final version of the RIAS. Both documents are again published in the Canada Gazette. As a result, the RIAS acquires the status of an official public document of the Government of Canada and its content can be argued in courts as an extrinsic aid to the interpretation of a regulation. In this paper, an analysis of empirical findings on the uses of this interpretative tool by the Federal Court of Canada is made. A sample of decisions classified as unorthodox show that judges are making determinations on the basis of two distinct sets of arguments built from the information found in a RIAS and which the author calls “technocratic” and “democratic”. The author argues that these uses raise the general question of “What makes law possible in our contemporary legal systems”? for they underline enduring legal problems pertaining to the knowledge and the acceptance of the law by the governed. She concludes that this new interpretive trend of making technocratic and democratic uses of a RIAS in case law should be monitored closely as it may signal a greater change than foreseen, and perhaps an unwanted one, regarding the relationship between the government and the judiciary.

Infinite-Horizon Choice Functions

We analyze infinite-horizon choice functions within the setting of a simple linear technology. Time consistency and efficiency are characterized by stationary consumption and inheritance functions, as well as a transversality condition. In addition, we consider the equity axioms Suppes-Sen, Pigou-Dalton, and resource monotonicity. We show that Suppes-Sen and Pigou-Dalton imply that the consumption and inheritance functions are monotone with respect to time—thus justifying sustainability—while resource monotonicity implies that the consumption and inheritance functions are monotone with respect to the resource. Examples illustrate the characterization results.

Self-Selective Social Choice Functions

It is not uncommon that a society facing a choice problem has also to choose the choice rule itself. In such situation voters’ preferences on alternatives induce preferences over the voting rules. Such a setting immediately gives rise to a natural question concerning consistency between these two levels of choice. If a choice rule employed to resolve the society’s original choice problem does not choose itself when it is also used in choosing the choice rule, then this phenomenon can be regarded as inconsistency of this choice rule as it rejects itself according to its own rationale. Koray (2000) proved that the only neutral, unanimous universally self-selective social choice functions are the dictatorial ones. Here we in troduce to our society a constitution, which rules out inefficient social choice rules. When inefficient social choice rules become unavailable for comparison, the property of self-selectivity becomes weaker and we show that some non-trivial self-selective social choice functions do exist. Under certain assumptions on the constitution we describe all of them.

Efficient estimation using the characteristic function : theory and applications with high frequency data

The attached file is created with Scientific Workplace Latex

Etudes ab initio des effets de la température sur le spectre optique des semi-conducteurs

Thèse réalisée en cotutelle avec l'Université Catholique de Louvain (Belgique)

An empirical study of the impact of two antipatterns on program comprehension

Les antipatrons sont de “mauvaises” solutions à des problèmes récurrents de conception logicielle. Leur apparition est soit due à de mauvais choix lors de la phase de conception soit à des altérations et des changements continus durant l’implantation des programmes. Dans la littérature, il est généralement admis que les antipatrons rendent la compréhension des programmes plus difficile. Cependant, peu d’études empiriques ont été menées pour vérifier l’impact des antipatrons sur la compréhension. Dans le cadre de ce travail de maîtrise, nous avons conçu et mené trois expériences, avec 24 sujets chacune, dans le but de recueillir des données sur la performance des sujets lors de tâches de compréhension et d’évaluer l’impact de l’existence de deux antipatrons, Blob et Spaghetti Code, et de leurs combinaisons sur la compréhension des programmes. Nous avons mesuré les performances des sujets en terme : (1) du TLX (NASA task load index) pour l’éffort ; (2) du temps consacré à l’exécution des tâches ; et, (3) de leurs pourcentages de réponses correctes. Les données recueillies montrent que la présence d’un antipatron ne diminue pas sensiblement la performance des sujets alors que la combinaison de deux antipatrons les entrave de façon significative. Nous concluons que les développeurs peuvent faire face à un seul antipatron, alors que la combinaison de plusieurs antipatrons devrait être évitée, éventuellement par le biais de détection et de réusinage.