957 resultados para Roberts, Griffith, 1816-1897.


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

At head of title: Appendix to the report of the Minister of Agriculture.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"First edition, November 1906. Reprinted before publication."

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Este artículo se propone analizar el debate sobre la forma de gobierno que se dio en las sesiones del Congreso Constituyente y en la prensa porteña durante 1816, como así también la posterior discusión del proyecto de constitución. Estas polémicas dieron lugar a diversas posturas acerca del ejercicio de la soberanía -monarquía o república- como sobre la titularidad de la misma -pueblos/nación-. En ese marco mostraremos que los partidarios de la unidad intentaron establecerla mediante la implantación de una monarquía constitucional y la consagración de la nación única e indivisible como sujeto de imputación de la soberanía

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

When Oscar Wilde was imprisoned in 1895, his plays were withdrawn from the London stage and, as Joel Kaplan and Seila Stowell note, exiled to the provinces and played with their author's name discreetly removed. Here, Fotheringham examines the impact of Wilde's trials and imprisonment throughout 1895-1897 on public reception to Brough-Boucicault Comedy Company's performances of his plays in Australia.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The need for improvement in the development of research careers and researchers’ training in transferable skills was highlighted in two particular recommendations (numbers 4.2 and 5.3) in the 2002 report ‘SET for success: the report of Sir Gareth Roberts’ Review - the supply of people with science, technology, engineering and mathematics skills’ (Roberts, 2002). As a consequence of that review, Research Councils UK (RCUK)1 have invested about £120 million, usually referred to as ’Roberts’ Money’, in research organisations to address this concern in all research disciplines. The last ‘Roberts’ Money’ payment will be for the period up to March 2011; it was therefore proposed to assess the progress made with taking forward these specific recommendations. An independent panel was formed by RCUK to undertake this review in 2010. The terms of reference for the panel are in Annex A. In summary, the panel was asked to review progress made and to advise RCUK and the higher education (HE) sector about future requirements for the development and training of researchers. In the course of their review, the panel considered a wide range of existing reports, interviewed key stakeholders in the HE sector and elsewhere, as well as drawing on their own knowledge and expertise. This report presents the findings of the panel’s review.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Case law report - online