A NEUROECONOMIC MODELING OF ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER (ADHD)

In this paper we present a new neuroeconomics model for decision-making applied to the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). The model is based on the hypothesis that decision-making is dependent on the evaluation of expected rewards and risks assessed simultaneously in two decision spaces: the personal (PDS) and the interpersonal emotional spaces (IDS). Motivation to act is triggered by necessities identified in PDS or IDS. The adequacy of an action in fulfilling a given necessity is assumed to be dependent on the expected reward and risk evaluated in the decision spaces. Conflict generated by expected reward and risk influences the easiness (cognitive effort) and the future perspective of the decision-making. Finally, the willingness (not) to act is proposed to be a function of the expected reward (or risk), adequacy, easiness and future perspective. The two most frequent clinical forms are ADHD hyperactive (AD/HDhyp) and ADHD inattentive (AD/HDdin). AD/HDhyp behavior is hypothesized to be a consequence of experiencing high rewarding expectancies for short periods of time, low risk evaluation, and short future perspective for decision-making. AD/HDin is hypothesized to be a consequence of experiencing high rewarding expectancies for long periods of time, low risk evaluation, and long future perspective for decision-making.

Morphology of the subgenual prefrontal cortex in pediatric bipolar disorder

Objectives The subgenual prefrontal cortex (SGPFC) is an important brain region involved in emotional regulation and reward mechanisms Volumetric abnormalities in this region have been identified in adults with bipolar disorder but thus far not in pediatric cases We examined the volume of this brain region in subjects with pediatric bipolar disorder (PBD) and compared them to healthy controls Methods Fifty one children and adolescents (mean age +/- SD 13 2 +/- 2 9 y) with DSM-IV PBD and 41 (mean age +/- SD 13 7 +/- 2 7 y) healthy comparison subjects (HC) underwent 1 5 T structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scans We traced the SGPFC manually and compared SGPFC gray matter volumes using analysis of covariance with age gender and intracranial volume as covariates We also examined the relationship of family history of affective disorders and medication status to SGPFC volumes Results SGPFC volumes were not significantly different in PBD and HC subjects However exploratory analysis showed PBD subjects who had one or more first degree relatives with mood disorders (n = 33) had significantly smaller left hemisphere SGPFC compared to HC (p = 003 Sidak corrected) Current usage of a mood stabilizer was significantly associated with larger right SGPFC volume in PBD (F = 4 82 df = 1/41 p = 0 03) Conclusion Subjects with PBD and a close family history of mood disorders may have smaller left SGPFC volumes than HC Mood stabilizing medication may also impact SGPFC size and could have masked more subtle abnormalities overall (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved