990 resultados para Irish Texts Society
Resumo:
Henkilökohtainen on poliittista Tutkimuksessa tarkastellaan tiedotusvälineissä käytyä neuvottelua miesten ja naisten mahdollisuuksista osallistua politiikkaan sekä siinä ilmenevää suomalaisen poliittisen julkisuuden muutosta. Tutkimuksen materiaalin muodostavat Anna-lehdessä vuosina 1975–2005 julkaistut 339 poliitikkojen henkilökuvaa, joita eritellään laadullisen tekstianalyysin keinoin. Politiikan sukupuolittunut työnjako Poliitikkojen henkilökuvat ovat Anna-lehdessä olleet henkilöhaastatteluja tai poliitikon haastatteluita yhdessä puolisonsa tai perheensä kanssa. Tutkittuna ajanjaksona Annassa on julkaistu selvästi enemmän naispoliitikkojen kuin miespoliitikkojen henkilökuvia. Poliitikkojen haastatteluissa neuvottellaan siitä, keillä on oikeus toimia politiikassa ja millaista politiikkaa miehet ja naiset voivat tehdä. Vaikka Annassa ilmestyneissä poliitikkojen henkilökuvissa on eri aikoina vastattu näihin kysymyksiin erilaisin tavoin, sukupuolittunut jako miesten yhteiskunnalliseen ja naisten yksityiseen tilaan säilyy teksteissä läpi koko tarkastellun 30 vuoden ajanjakson. Sukupuolittunut jako yhteiskunnalliseen ja yksityiseen ilmenee henkilökuvissa siten, että miehet esitetään toimimassa politiikassa vaivattomasti ja luonnollisesti, mutta naisten kuvataan ponnistelevan sen eteen, että he kykenisivät osallistumaan politiikkaan. Naispoliitikkojen henkilökuvissa toistuva kysymys on, millä edellytyksin tai millaisin rajoituksin naiset ovat voineet toimia politiikassa. Miehet edustavat poliitikon normia ja naiset poikkeusta normista. Poliitikkojen parisuhde- ja perhehaastatteluissa puolestaan käsitellään kysymystä sukupuolten välisestä työnjaosta perheessä. Kirjoituksissa toistuvat kysymykset siitä, millainen tulisi olla poliitikon ja hänen puolisonsa välinen työnjako, tulisiko miespoliitikon vaimon osallistua pyyteettömästi puolison uran tukemiseen tai millä tavoin naispoliitikon puolison tulisi suhtautua vaimonsa aikaa vievään poliittiseen uraan. Naispoliitikkojen haasteita Annan julkaisemat naispoliitikkojen henkilökuvat osoittavat sekä naisten poliittiseen osallistumiseen liittyviä ongelmia että joukon erilaisia ratkaisuja niihin. Naisten ruumiillisuus on näistä haasteista keskeisin. 1970-luvun Annassa ilmestyneissä naispoliitikkojen haastatteluissa käsiteltiin toistuvasti sitä, millä tavoin politiikassa työskentelevät naiset pukeutuvat, syövät ja lepäävät. 1980-luvulla Anna pyrki tekemään naisruumiista voimavaran osoittamalla, että naisten ”luonteva” taipumus hoivaamiseen teki heistä erityisen sopivia politiikan ”pehmeiden” asioiden puolestapuhujina, kuten rauhantyön ja sosiaalisektorin asioiden hoitajina. 1980-luvun lopussa ja 1990-luvun alussa julkaistuissa teksteissä luotiin naisten poliittista yhteisöllisyyttä korostamalla heidän kokemaansa ruumiillisuuteen perustuvaa sortoa, esimerkiksi ulkonäköön liittyviä epäasiallisia huomautuksia. 2000-luvulla naispoliitikkojen henkilökuvissa vakuutettiin, että naisen ikääntyminen ei heikennä hänen kykyään tehdä politiikkaa. Samana aikakautena julkaistuissa nuorehkojen naispoliitikkojen henkilökuvissa ruumiillisuuteen otettiin toinen näkökulma. Niissä naisruumiin väitetty sopimattomuus poliittiseen työhön ratkaistiin korostamalla, että haastatellut naiset kontrolloivat ruumistaan täydellisesti. Toinen naispoliitikkojen poliittista osallistumista uhkaavana tai häiritsevänä esitetty seikka Annassa on ollut yksityiselämä. Lehden mukaan kodin, puolison ja lasten yhdistäminen menestyksekkääseen poliittiseen uraan on ollut erityisen vaikeaa. 1980-luvun loppuun saakka henkilökuviin rakennettiin asetelma, jossa naispoliitikkojen tuli valita työn tai perheen välillä. Vuosituhannen taitteessa Anna otti yksityiselämän ja julkisen elämän väliseen ristiriitaan uuden näkökulman: lehti alkoi esittää, että lapset ovat naispoliitikkojen työelämän voimavara. Kirjoitusten mukaan tehokkaat nuoret naispoliitikot kykenivät halutessaan olemaan sekä ”pullantuoksuisia” äitejä että menestyviä poliitikkoja. Samalla kirjoitukset kuitenkin epäsuorasti osoittivat, ettei yksityisen ja julkisen elämän ristiriita kadonnut naispoliitikkojen kuvauksista: se vain muutti muotoaan ja sai uuden ratkaisun. Miespoliitikkojen luontevana esitetty asiantuntemus Annassa julkaistut miespoliitikkojen haastattelut ovat läpi tutkitun ajanjakson uusintaneet mielikuvaa yhteiskunnallisesta tilasta miehille luontaisesti sopivana ympäristönä. Niissä puhutaan politiikasta ikään kuin se olisi ainoastaan miesten hallitsema elämänpiiri. Poliitikka näyttäytyy miesten välisen kamppailun ja veljeyden kenttänä. Henkilökuvissa miespoliitikot pyrkivät kukistamaan vastustajansa, mutta samalla menestys miesten maailmassa edellyttää muiden miesten hyväksyntää. Henkilökuvissa rakennetaan vahvasti käsitystä miespoliitikoista yhteiskunnallisina asiantuntijoina. Kirjoituksissa heille annetaan tilaa ja mahdollisuuden käsitellä ajankohtaisia poliittisia ongelmia, kuten esimerkiksi terveydenhuollon tilaa tai yleissivistyksen tasoa Suomessa. Ero Annan julkaisemiin naispoliitikkojen haastatteluihin on selvä. Niiden joukossa vuosina 1975–2005 ei ole sellaisia kirjoituksia, joissa naispoliitikolla olisi itsestäänselvästi asiantuntemusta tai arvovaltaa käsitellä koko kansakuntaa askarruttavia yhteiskunnallisia kysymyksiä. Henkilökohtainen on poliittista Annan julkaisemat poliittikkojen henkilökuvat osoittavat, millä tavoin henkilökohtaisiksi mielletyt asiat ovat muuttuneet poliittisiksi. Kärjistäen voi sanoa, että 1970-luvun puolivälissä Suomessa oli vallalla mielikuva, jossa vastakkain asettuivat miesten politiikka ja naisten yksityiselämä. Kolmessakymmenessä vuodessa tilanne on muuttunut. 1980-luvun alussa Anna argumentoi, että naisten kokemus arkielämästä ja lasten kasvattamisesta antoi heille sellaista asiantuntemusta, jota tulisi hyödyntää myös politiikassa. Annan mukaan miesten hallitseva asema politiikassa oli johtanut tilanteeseen, jossa huomattava osa kansasta ei saanut ääntään politiikassa kuuluviin. 2000-luvulle tultaessa on mahdollista nähdä, että politiikkaan on muodostunut naisille sopivana nähty toiminnan sektori, johon kuuluvat esimerkiksi sosiaali- ja terveydenhuolto, opetus-, ympäristö- ja kulttuuripolitiikka sekä kansainvälinen kehitysyhteistyö. Verrattuna 1970-luvun puolivälin tilanteeseen naiset osallistuvat luontevasti huomattavaan osaan suomalaista politiikkaa. Sukupuolittunut yhteiskunnallinen jakolinja ei kulje enää politiikan ja yksityiselämän välillä, vaan politiikan sisällä. Samalla käsitys politiikasta on muuttunut. Hyvinvointivaltion ja valtion sosiaalisektoriin liittyvien vastuiden laajentuminen on johtanut tilanteeseen, jossa naisille sopiviksi miellettyjen poliittisten osaamisalueiden määrä on kasvanut. On myös puhuttu politiikan intimisaatiosta, jolla tarkoitetaan, että valtioiden poliittisen toiminnan piiri on tullut yhä lähemmäs ihmisten henkilökohtaista elämää. Naisten aikaisempaa laajempi poliittinen osallistuminen ei olisi ollut mahdollista ilman keskustelua aiheista, jotka koetaan hyvin henkilökohtaisiksi: ruumiin ja politiikan suhteesta, yksityiselämän ja julkisen elämän suhteesta tai arkielämän kokemusten suhteesta poliittiseen osallistumiseen. Näin henkilökohtainen ja poliittinen ovat olleet jatkuvassa vuorovaikutuksessa keskenään. Annan henkilökuvat kertovat muutoksesta, jossa yksityiselämän tapahtumat ovat tulleet kiinteäksi osaksi politiikan julkisuutta. Yksityiselämän julkisuus on ollut poliitikoille sekä mahdollisuus että haaste. Yhtäältä yksityiselämän julkisuus on tarjonnut miespoliitikoille oivallisen keinon tuoda esille henkilökohtaisensa elämänsä myönteisiä puolia, esimerkiksi omistautumista perheelle. Naispoliitikoille yksityiselämän tuleminen julkiseksi on tarjonnut keinon haastaa ja kyseenalaistaa niitä arvoja, joiden mukaan nainen ei voi onnistuneesti yhdistää menestystä työ- ja perhe-elämässä. Samalla poliittisen julkisuuden muutos on merkinnyt sitä, että yksityiselämästä on tullut poliitikoille myös rasite. Julkisuudessa ei tehdä selkeää rajaa yksityisen ja julkisen elämän välillä, vaan henkilökohtaisen elämän valinnoista ja tapahtumista on tullut erottamaton osa poliitikkojen julkisuuskuvaa. Annan julkaisemien poliitikkojen henkilökuvien analyysi osoittaa, että poliitikot symboloivat yhteiskunnallisia arvoja ja asenteita. Poliitikot eivät ole vain ihmisiä ansioineen ja puutteineen, vaan heidän saamansa julkisuuden kautta keskustellaan suuremmista yhteiskunnallisista kysymyksistä, kuten naisten oikeudesta osallistua politiikkaa tai sukupuolten välisestä työnjaosta yhteiskunnassa. Annassa ilmestyneet poliitikkojen henkilökuvat ovat olleet osa prosessia, jossa suomalainen sukupuolittunut työnjako on neuvoteltu merkittävältä osaltaan uuteen muotoon. Naiset ovat saaneet vastuulleen olennaisen osan suomalaista politiikkaa samalla kun politiikan sisältö on myös muuttunut. Julkisuudessa näkyvien poliitikkojen henkilökohtaisen elämän valinnat asettuvat kontekstiinsa osana neuvotteluprosessia, jossa mietitään ja kyseenlaistetaan yhteiskunnallisia arvoja ja asenteita. Tässäkin mielessä henkilökohtaisesta on tullut poliittista.
Resumo:
The flow of information within modern information society has increased rapidly over the last decade. The major part of this information flow relies on the individual’s abilities to handle text or speech input. For the majority of us it presents no problems, but there are some individuals who would benefit from other means of conveying information, e.g. signed information flow. During the last decades the new results from various disciplines have all suggested towards the common background and processing for sign and speech and this was one of the key issues that I wanted to investigate further in this thesis. The basis of this thesis is firmly within speech research and that is why I wanted to design analogous test batteries for widely used speech perception tests for signers – to find out whether the results for signers would be the same as in speakers’ perception tests. One of the key findings within biology – and more precisely its effects on speech and communication research – is the mirror neuron system. That finding has enabled us to form new theories about evolution of communication, and it all seems to converge on the hypothesis that all communication has a common core within humans. In this thesis speech and sign are discussed as equal and analogical counterparts of communication and all research methods used in speech are modified for sign. Both speech and sign are thus investigated using similar test batteries. Furthermore, both production and perception of speech and sign are studied separately. An additional framework for studying production is given by gesture research using cry sounds. Results of cry sound research are then compared to results from children acquiring sign language. These results show that individuality manifests itself from very early on in human development. Articulation in adults, both in speech and sign, is studied from two perspectives: normal production and re-learning production when the apparatus has been changed. Normal production is studied both in speech and sign and the effects of changed articulation are studied with regards to speech. Both these studies are done by using carrier sentences. Furthermore, sign production is studied giving the informants possibility for spontaneous speech. The production data from the signing informants is also used as the basis for input in the sign synthesis stimuli used in sign perception test battery. Speech and sign perception were studied using the informants’ answers to questions using forced choice in identification and discrimination tasks. These answers were then compared across language modalities. Three different informant groups participated in the sign perception tests: native signers, sign language interpreters and Finnish adults with no knowledge of any signed language. This gave a chance to investigate which of the characteristics found in the results were due to the language per se and which were due to the changes in modality itself. As the analogous test batteries yielded similar results over different informant groups, some common threads of results could be observed. Starting from very early on in acquiring speech and sign the results were highly individual. However, the results were the same within one individual when the same test was repeated. This individuality of results represented along same patterns across different language modalities and - in some occasions - across language groups. As both modalities yield similar answers to analogous study questions, this has lead us to providing methods for basic input for sign language applications, i.e. signing avatars. This has also given us answers to questions on precision of the animation and intelligibility for the users – what are the parameters that govern intelligibility of synthesised speech or sign and how precise must the animation or synthetic speech be in order for it to be intelligible. The results also give additional support to the well-known fact that intelligibility in fact is not the same as naturalness. In some cases, as shown within the sign perception test battery design, naturalness decreases intelligibility. This also has to be taken into consideration when designing applications. All in all, results from each of the test batteries, be they for signers or speakers, yield strikingly similar patterns, which would indicate yet further support for the common core for all human communication. Thus, we can modify and deepen the phonetic framework models for human communication based on the knowledge obtained from the results of the test batteries within this thesis.
Resumo:
Unlike their counterparts in Europe and America, the citizen organizations acting for the well-being of animals in Japan have not received scholarly attention. In this research, I explore the activities of twelve Japanese pro-animal organizations in Tokyo and Kansai area from the perspective of social movement and civil society studies. The concept of a ‘pro-animal organization’ is used to refer generally to the collectives promoting animal well-being. By using the collective action frame analysis and the three core framing tasks – diagnostic, prognostic, and motivational – as the primarily analytical tools, I explore the grievances, tactics, motivational means, constructions of agency and identity as well as framing of civil society articulated in the newsletters and the interviews of the twelve organizations I interviewed in Japan in 2010. As the frame construction is always done in relation to the social and political context, I study how the organizations construct their roles as civil society actors in relation to other actors, such as the state, and the idea of citizen activism. The deficiencies in the animal welfare law and lack of knowledge among the public are identified as the main grievances. The primary tactic to overcome these problems was to educate and inform the citizens and authorities, because most organizations lack the channels to influence politically. The audiences were mostly portrayed as either ignorant bystanders or potential adherents. In order to motivate people to join their cause and to enforce the motivation within the organization, the organizations emphasized their uniqueness, proved their efficiency, claimed credit and celebrated even small improvements. The organizations tended to create three different roles for citizen pro-organizations in civil society: reactive, apolitical and emphatic animal lovers concentrating on saving individual animals, proactive, educative bridge-builders seeking to establish equal collaborative relations with authorities, and corrective, supervising watchdogs demanding change in delinquencies offending animal rights. Based on the results of this research, I suggest that by studying how and why the different relations between civil society and the governing actors of the state are constructed, a more versatile approach to citizens’ activism in its context can be achieved.
Resumo:
We live in an age where rationalization and demands of efficiency taint every aspect of our lives both as individuals and as a society. Even warfare cannot escape the increased speed of human interaction. Time is a resource to be managed. It has to be optimized, saved and won in military affairs as well. The purpose of this research paper is to analyze the dogmatic texts of military thought to search for answers what the classics of strategy saw in the interrelations of temporality and warfare and if their thoughts remain meaningful in the contemporary conjunction. Since the way a society functions is reflected in the way it conducts its wars, there naturally are differences between an agrarian, industrial and information society. Theorists of different eras emphasize things specific to their times, but warfare, like any human interaction, is always bounded by temporality. Not only is the pace of warfare dependent on the progress of the society, but time permeates warfare in all its aspects. This research paper focuses on two specific topics that arose from the texts themselves; how should time be managed and manipulated in warfare and how to economize and “win” it from the enemy. A method where lengthy quotations are used to illustrate the main point of the strategists has been chosen for this research paper. While Clausewitz is the most prominent source of quotations, thoughts from ancient India and China are represented as well to prove that the combination of right force in the right place at the right time is still the way of the victorious. Tactics change in the course of time but the principles of strategy remain unaltered and are only adapted to suit new situations. While ancient and pre-modern societies had their focus on finding auspicious moments for battle in the flow of kronos-time based on divinities, portents and auguries, we can trace elements of manipulation of time in warfare from the earliest surviving texts. While time as a fourth dimension of the battlespace emerged only in the modern era, all through the history of military thought it has had a profound meaning. In the past time could be squandered, today it always has to be won. This paper asks the question “why”.
Resumo:
This study presents a review of theories of the so-called post-industrial society, and proposes that the concept of post-industrial society can be used to understand the recent developments of the World Wide Web, often described as Web 2.0 or social Web. The study combines theories ranging from post-war management science and cultural studies to software development, and tries to build a holistic view of the development of the post-industrial society, and especially the Internet. The discourse on the emergence of a post-industrial society after the World Wars has addressed the ways in which the growing importance of information, and innovations in digital communications technology, are changing our society. It is furthermore deeply connected with the discourse on the postmodern society, which emphasizes cultural fragmentation, intertextuality, and pluralism. The Internet age is characterized by increasing masses of information that are managed through various technologies. While 1990s Internet technologies often used the network as a traditional broadcasting channel with added interactivity, Web 2.0 technologies are specifically designed to utilize the network model by facilitating communication between various services and devices, and analyzing the relationships between users and objects in order to produce intelligent insight. The wide adoption of the Internet, and recently of Internet-enabled mobile devices, is furthermore continuously producing new ways of communicating, consuming, and producing. Applications of the social Web, such as social media or social networking services, are permanently changing our traditional social, cultural, and economic practices. The study first presents an overview of the post-industrial society, the Internet, and the concept of Web 2.0. Then the concept of social Web is described with an analysis of the term social media, the brief histories of the interactive Web and social networking services, and a description of the concept ―long tail‖, used to represent the masses of information available in the Web that do not receive mainstream attention. Finally, methods for retrieving and filtering information, modeling social and cultural relationships, and communicating with customers, are presented.
Resumo:
The thesis is the first comprehensive study on Finnish public painting, public artworks generally referred to as murals or monumental paintings. It focuses on the processes of production of public paintings during the post-WWII decades in Finland and the complex relationships between the political sphere and the production of art. The research studies the networks of agents involved in the production of public paintings. Besides the human agents—artists, assistants, commissioners and viewers—also public paintings were and are agents in the processes of production and in their environments. The research questions can be grouped into three overlapping series of questions: First, the research investigates the production public paintings: What kinds of public paintings were realised in postwar Finland—how, where, by whom and for what purposes? Second, it discusses the publicness of these paintings: How were public paintings defined, and what aspects characterised them as “public”? What was their relation to public space, public authorities, and audience? And third, it explores the politics of public paintings: the relationship between Finnish public painting, nationalism, and the memory of war. To answer these questions, extensive archival work has been performed, and over 200 public paintings have been documented around Finland. The research material has been studied in a sociological framework and in the context of the political and economic history of Finland, employing critical theories on public space and public art as well as theories on the building of nationalism, commemoration, memory, and forgetting. An important aim of this research was to open up a new field of study and position public painting within Finnish art history, from which it has been conspicuous by its absence. The research indicates that public painting was a significant genre of art in postwar Finland. The process of creating a national genre of public painting participated in the defining of municipal and state art politics in the country, and paintings functioned as vehicles of carrying out the agenda of the commissioning bodies. In the formation of municipal art policies in Finland in the 1950s, public painting connected to the same tendency of democratising art as the founding of public art museums. Public painting commissions also functioned as an arena of competition and a means of support for the artists. Public paintings were judged and commissioned within the realm of political decision-making, and they suggested the values of the decision-making groups, generally conveyed as the values of the society. The participation of official agents in the production allocated a position of official art to the genre. Through the material of this research, postwar public painting is seen as an agent in a society searching for a new identity. The postwar public painting production participated in the creation of the Finnish welfare society as indications of a humane society. It continued a tradition of public art production that had been built on nationalist and art educational ideologies in the late 19th and early 20th century. Postwar public paintings promoted the new national narrative of unification by creating an image of a homogeneous society with a harmonious communal life. The paintings laid out an image of Finnishness that was modern but rooted in the agrarian past, of a society that was based on hard work and provided for its members a good life. Postwar public painting was art with a mission, and it created an image of a society with a mission.
Resumo:
From Bildung to Civilisation. Conception of Culture in J. V. Snellman’s Historical Thinking The research explores Johan Vilhelm Snellman’s (1806–1881) conception of culture in the context of his historical thinking. Snellman was a Finnish, Swedish-speaking journalist, teacher and thinker, who held a central position in the Finnish national discourse during the nineteenth century. He has been considered as one of the leading theorists of a Finnish nation, writing widely about the themes such as the advancement of the national education, Finnish language and culture. Snellman is already a widely studied person in Finnish intellectual history, often characterised as a follower of G. W. F. Hegel’s philosophical system. My own research introduces a new kind of approach on Snellman’s texts, emphasising the conceptual level of his thought. With this approach, my aim is to broaden the Finnish research tradition on conceptual history. I consider my study as a cultural history of concepts, belonging also to the field of intellectual history. My focus is on one hand on the close reading of Snellman’s texts and on the other hand on contextualising his texts to the European intellectual tradition of the time. A key concept of Snellman’s theoretical thinking is his concept of bildning, which can be considered as a Swedish counterpart of the German concept of Bildung. The Swedish word incorporated all the main elements of the German concept. It could mean education or the so-called high culture, but most fundamentally it was about the self-formation of the individual. This is also the context in which Snellman’s concept of bildning has often been interpreted. In the study, I use the concept of bildning as a starting point of my research but I broaden my focus on the cognate concepts such as culture (kultur), spirit (anda) and civilisation. The purpose of my study is thus to illustrate how Snellman used and modified these concepts and from these observations to draw a conclusion about the nature of his conception of culture. Snellman was an early Finnish philosopher of history but also interested in the practice of the writing of history. He did not write any historical presentations himself but followed the publications in the field of history and introduced European historical writing to the Finnish, Swedish-speaking reading audience in his newspapers. The primary source material consists of different types of Snellman’s texts, including philosophical writings, lecture material, newspaper articles and private letters. I’m reading Snellman’s texts in the context of other texts produced both by his Finnish predecessors and contemporaries and by Swedish, German and French writers. Snellman’s principal philosophical works, Versuch einer spekulativen Entwicklung der Idee der Persönlichkeit (1841) and Läran om staten (1842), were both written abroad. Both of the works were contributions to contemporary debates on the international level, especially in Germany and Sweden. During the 1840s and 1850s Snellman had two newspapers of his own, Saima and Litteraturblad, which were directed towards the Swedish-speaking educated class. Both of the newspapers were very popular and their circulations were among the largest of their day in Finland. The topics of his articles and reviews covered literature, poetry, philosophy and education as well as issues concerning the economic, industrial and technical development in Finland. In his newspapers Snellman not only brought forth his own ideas but also spread the knowledge of European events and ideas to his readers. He followed very carefully the cultural and political situation in Western Europe. He also followed European magazines and newspapers and was well acquainted with German, French and also English literature – and of course Swedish literature to with which he had the closest ties. In his newspapers Snellman wrote countless number of literary reviews and critics, introducing his readers to European literature. The study consists of three main chapters in which I explore my research question in three different, yet overlapping contexts. In the first of these chapters, I analyse Snellman’n theoretical thinking and his concepts of bildning, kultur, anda and civilisation in the context of earlier cultural discourse in Finland as well as the tradition of German idealistic philosophy and neo-humanism. With the Finnish cultural discourse I refer to the early cultural discussion in Finland, which emerged after the year 1809, when Finland became an autonomous entity of its own as a Grand Duchy of Russia. Scholars of the Academy of Turku opened a discussion on the themes such as the state of national consciousness, the need for national education and the development of the Finnish language as a national language of Finland. Many of these academics were also Snellman’s teachers in the early years of his academic career and Snellman clearly formulated his own ideas in the footsteps of these Finnish predecessors. In his theoretical thinking Snellman was a collectivist; according to him an individual should always be understood in connection with the society, its values and manners, as well as to the traditions of a culture where an individual belongs to. In his philosophy of the human spirit Snellman was in many ways a Hegelian but his notion of education or ‘bildning’ includes also elements that connect him with the wider tradition of German intellectual history, namely the neo-humanist tradition and, at least to some extent, to the terminology of J. G. Herder or J. G. Fichte, for example. In this chapter, I also explore Snellman’s theory of history. In his historical thinking Snellman was an idealist, believing in the historical development of the human spirit (Geist in German language). One can characterise his theory of history by stating that it is a mixture of a Hegelian triumph of the spirit and Herderian emphasis on humanity (Humanität) and the relative nature of ‘Bildung’. For Snellman, the process of ‘bildning’ or ‘Bildung’ is being realised in historical development through the actions of human beings. Snellman believed in the historical development of the human civilization. Still Snellman himself considered that he had abandoned Hegel’s idea about the process of world history. Snellman – rightly or wrongly – criticised Hegel of emphasising the universal end of history (the realisation of the freedom of spirit) at the expense of the historical plurality and the freedom of each historical era. Snellman accused Hegel of neglecting the value and independency of different historical cultures and periods by imposing the abstract norm, the fulfilment of the freedom of spirit, as the ultimate goal of history. The historicist in Snellman believed in the individuality of each historical period; each historical era or culture had values, traditions and modes of thought of its own. This historicist in Snellman could not accept the talk about one measure or the end of history. On the other hand Snellman was also a universalist. He believed that mankind had a common task and that task was the development of ‘Bildung’, freedom or humanity. The second main chapter consists of two parts. In the first part, I explore the Finnish nationalistic discourse from the cultural point of view by analysing the notions such as a nation, national spirit or national language and showing how Snellman formulated his own ideas in a dialogic situation, participating in the Finnish discourse but also reacting to international discussions on the themes of the nation and nationality. For Snellman nationality was to a great extent the collective knowledge and customs or practices of the nation. Snellman stated that nationality is to be considered as a form of ‘bildning’. This could be seen not simply as affection for the fatherland but also for the mental identity of the nation, its ways of thinking, its practices, national language, customs and laws, the history of the nation. The simplest definition of nationality that Snellman gives is that nationality is the social life of the people. In the second part of the chapter I exam Snellman’s historical thinking and his understanding about historical development, interaction between different nations and cultures in the course of history, as well as the question of historical change; how do cultures or civilisations develop and who are the creators of culture? Snellman did not believe in one dominating culture but understood the course of history as a dialogue between different cultures. On the other hand, his views are very Eurocentric – here he follows the ideas of Hegel or for example the French historian François Guizot – for Snellman Europe represented the virtue of pluralism; in Europe one could see the diversity of cultures which, on the other hand, were fundamentally based on a common Christian tradition. In the third main chapter, my focus is on the writing of history, more precisely on Snellman’s ideas on the nature of history as a science and on the proper way of writing historical presentations. Snellman wrote critics on the works of history and introduced his readers to the writing of history especially in France, Sweden and German-speaking area – in some extend also in Britain. Snellman’s collectivistic view becomes evident also in his reviews on historical writing. For Snellman history was not about the actions of the states and their heads, nor about the records of ruling families and battles fought. He repeatedly stressed that history is a discipline that seeks to provide a total view of a phenomenon. A historian should not only collect information on historical events, since this information touches only the surface of a certain epoch or civilisation; he has to understand an epoch as totality. This required an understanding about the major contours in history, connections between civilisations and an awareness of significant turning points in historical development. In addition, it required a holistic understanding about a certain culture or historical era, including also the so-called inner life of a specific nation, a common people and their ways of life. Snellman wrote explicitly about ‘cultural history’ in his texts, referring to this kind of broad understanding of a society. In historical writing Snellman found this kind of broader view from the works of the French historians such as François Guizot and Jules Michelet. In all of these chapters, I elaborate the conceptual dimension of Snellman’s historical thinking. In my study I argue that Snellman not only adopted the German concepts of Bildung or Kultur in his own thinking but also developed the Swedish concepts in a way that include personal and innovative aspects. Snellman’s concept of bildning is not only a translation from ‘Bildung’ but he uses the Swedish concept in a versatile way that includes both the moral aspect of human development and social dimension of a human life. Along with ‘bildning’ Snellman used also the terms ‘kultur’ and ‘civilisation’ when referring to the totality of a certain nation or historical era, including both the so-called high culture (arts, science, religion) and the modes of thought as well as ways of life of the people as a whole. Unlike many of his Finnish contemporaries, Snellman did not use civilisation as a negative concept, lacking the moral essence of German term ‘Bildung’ or ‘Kultur’. Instead, for Snellman civilisation was a neutral term and here he comes close to the French tradition of using the term. In the study I argue that Snellman’s conception of culture in fact includes a synthesis of the German tradition of ‘Bildung’ and the French tradition of ‘civilisation’.
Resumo:
Min avhandling är en diakronisk och kontrastiv undersökning av texttyper. Forskningsmaterialet består av kontaktannonser i tidningarna Süddeutsche Zeitung och Helsingin Sanomat under tiden 1900 – 1999. Materialet består av 652 tyska och 538 finska annonser. De undersökta annonserna har publicerats i maj och har samlats från ovannämnda tidningar vart tionde år. Materialet har analyserats med ett statistiskt SPSS-program. I avhandlingen analyseras utvecklingen av ovannämnda texttyp under hundra år i två olika kulturer, den tyska och den finska. Syftet med avhandlingen är att med hjälp av detta material finna språkliga och kulturella likheter och skillnader i kontaktannonser. Utgångspunkten är att språkliga uttryck avspeglar sin tids samhälleliga värderingar, vilka således också påverkar sökandet efter en livskamrat. Analysresultaten granskas sålunda i ett större samhälleligt sammanhang under olika decennier. Annonstexterna undersöks dock inte utgående från enskilda samhälleliga skeenden. Avhandlingen analyserar 13 olika informationsenheter i kontaktannonserna, huruvida dessa enheter förekommer under hela den aktuella perioden och om samma informationsenheter förekommer i annonser i de båda kulturerna. Avhandlingen är sålunda intra- och interlingual samt interkulturell. Genom denna metod får man fram de kännetecken som är betecknande för denna texttyp under en viss tid i de bägge kulturerna. Avhandlingen är indelad i tre delar. Den första delen ger bakgrundsinformation om äktenskapets och familjebegreppets historia samt om uppkomsten av den tyska och finska pressen. Den andra teoretiska delen behandlar text- och texttyplingvistik samt nuvarande forskning inom dessa områden. Den tredje och mest omfattade delen består av en kvalitativ och kvantitativ analys, som omfattar 11 olika forskningsdelar. Undersökningen visar att man i texttypen kontaktannonser kan upptäcka skillnader t ex redan däri att en tysk annons skiljer sig från en finsk vad längd och informationsmängd beträffar. En finsk annons förlitar sig i sin språkliga knapphet på att läsaren förstår kontexten i texttypen. Av avhandlingen framgår också att vid analys av texttyper bör deras historiska och kulturella kontext beaktas, eftersom analysen påvisar att texttyperna är historie- och kulturbundna.
Resumo:
Jussi-Pekka Hakkaraisen esitys 24. Kansainvälisessä tieteen-, teknologian ja lääketieteen historian kongressissa (24th International Congress of History of Science, Technology and Medicine) Manchesterissa 26.7.2013
Resumo:
Can crowdsourcing solutions serve many masters? Can they be beneficial for both, for the layman or native speakers of minority languages on the one hand and serious linguistic research on the other? How did an infrastructure that was designed to support linguistics turn out to be a solution for raising awareness of native languages? Since 2012 the National Library of Finland has been developing the Digitisation Project for Kindred Languages, in which the key objective is to support a culture of openness and interaction in linguistic research, but also to promote crowdsourcing as a tool for participation of the language community in research. In the course of the project, over 1,200 monographs and nearly 111,000 pages of newspapers in Finno-Ugric languages will be digitised and made available in the Fenno-Ugrica digital collection. This material was published in the Soviet Union in the 1920s and 1930s, and users have had only sporadic access to the material. The publication of open-access and searchable materials from this period is a goldmine for researchers. Historians, social scientists and laymen with an interest in specific local publications can now find text materials pertinent to their studies. The linguistically-oriented population can also find writings to delight them: (1) lexical items specific to a given publication, and (2) orthographically-documented specifics of phonetics. In addition to the open access collection, we developed an open source code OCR editor that enables the editing of machine-encoded text for the benefit of linguistic research. This tool was necessary since these rare and peripheral prints often include already archaic characters, which are neglected by modern OCR software developers but belong to the historical context of kindred languages, and are thus an essential part of the linguistic heritage. When modelling the OCR editor, it was essential to consider both the needs of researchers and the capabilities of lay citizens, and to have them participate in the planning and execution of the project from the very beginning. By implementing the feedback iteratively from both groups, it was possible to transform the requested changes as tools for research that not only supported the work of linguistics but also encouraged the citizen scientists to face the challenge and work with the crowdsourcing tools for the benefit of research. This presentation will not only deal with the technical aspects, developments and achievements of the infrastructure but will highlight the way in which user groups, researchers and lay citizens were engaged in a process as an active and communicative group of users and how their contributions were made to mutual benefit.