Du traitement précoce des sujets à risque aux risques du traitement précoce. Le dilemme de la prévention des troubles psychotiques [From early treatment of psychosis risk to the risks of early intervention: the dilemma of psychosis prevention].

While the development of early psychosis intervention programs have improved outcome of such disorders, primary prevention strategies are still out of reach. The elaboration, over the last 15 years, of scales and criteria to identify populations at high risk for psychosis is a real progress, but their low specificity is still a major obstacle to their use outside of research projects. For this reason, even if "ultra high risk", subjects present with real psychiatric disorders and sometimes significant decrease in functioning level, the fact that only a small proportion will eventually develop full blown psychosis will probably lead to the rejection of a "psychosis risk syndrom" from the future DSM-V classification.

Efficacy of a dilemma-focused intervention for unipolar depression: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Background Depression is one of the more severe and serious health problems because of its morbidity, disabling effects and for its societal and economic burden. Despite the variety of existing pharmacological and psychological treatments, most of the cases evolve with only partial remission, relapse and recurrence. Cognitive models have contributed significantly to the understanding of unipolar depression and its psychological treatment. However, success is only partial and many authors affirm the need to improve those models and also the treatment programs derived from them. One of the issues that requires further elaboration is the difficulty these patients experience in responding to treatment and in maintaining therapeutic gains across time without relapse or recurrence. Our research group has been working on the notion of cognitive conflict viewed as personal dilemmas according to personal construct theory. We use a novel method for identifying those conflicts using the repertory grid technique (RGT). Preliminary results with depressive patients show that about 90% of them have one or more of those conflicts. This fact might explain the blockage and the difficult progress of these patients, especially the more severe and/or chronic. These results justify the need for specific interventions focused on the resolution of these internal conflicts. This study aims to empirically test the hypothesis that an intervention focused on the dilemma(s) specifically detected for each patient will enhance the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for depression. Design A therapy manual for a dilemma-focused intervention will be tested using a randomized clinical trial by comparing the outcome of two treatment conditions: combined group CBT (eight, 2-hour weekly sessions) plus individual dilemma-focused therapy (eight, 1-hour weekly sessions) and CBT alone (eight, 2-hour group weekly sessions plus eight, 1-hour individual weekly sessions). Method Participants are patients aged over 18 years meeting diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder or dysthymic disorder, with a score of 19 or above on the Beck depression inventory, second edition (BDI-II) and presenting at least one cognitive conflict (implicative dilemma or dilemmatic construct) as assessed using the RGT. The BDI-II is the primary outcome measure, collected at baseline, at the end of therapy, and at 3- and 12-month follow-up; other secondary measures are also used. Discussion We expect that adding a dilemma-focused intervention to CBT will increase the efficacy of one of the more prestigious therapies for depression, thus resulting in a significant contribution to the psychological treatment of depression. Trial registration ISRCTN92443999; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01542957.

Efficacy of a dilemma-focused intervention for unipolar depression: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Background Depression is one of the more severe and serious health problems because of its morbidity, disabling effects and for its societal and economic burden. Despite the variety of existing pharmacological and psychological treatments, most of the cases evolve with only partial remission, relapse and recurrence. Cognitive models have contributed significantly to the understanding of unipolar depression and its psychological treatment. However, success is only partial and many authors affirm the need to improve those models and also the treatment programs derived from them. One of the issues that requires further elaboration is the difficulty these patients experience in responding to treatment and in maintaining therapeutic gains across time without relapse or recurrence. Our research group has been working on the notion of cognitive conflict viewed as personal dilemmas according to personal construct theory. We use a novel method for identifying those conflicts using the repertory grid technique (RGT). Preliminary results with depressive patients show that about 90% of them have one or more of those conflicts. This fact might explain the blockage and the difficult progress of these patients, especially the more severe and/or chronic. These results justify the need for specific interventions focused on the resolution of these internal conflicts. This study aims to empirically test the hypothesis that an intervention focused on the dilemma(s) specifically detected for each patient will enhance the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for depression. Design A therapy manual for a dilemma-focused intervention will be tested using a randomized clinical trial by comparing the outcome of two treatment conditions: combined group CBT (eight, 2-hour weekly sessions) plus individual dilemma-focused therapy (eight, 1-hour weekly sessions) and CBT alone (eight, 2-hour group weekly sessions plus eight, 1-hour individual weekly sessions). Method Participants are patients aged over 18 years meeting diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder or dysthymic disorder, with a score of 19 or above on the Beck depression inventory, second edition (BDI-II) and presenting at least one cognitive conflict (implicative dilemma or dilemmatic construct) as assessed using the RGT. The BDI-II is the primary outcome measure, collected at baseline, at the end of therapy, and at 3- and 12-month follow-up; other secondary measures are also used. Discussion We expect that adding a dilemma-focused intervention to CBT will increase the efficacy of one of the more prestigious therapies for depression, thus resulting in a significant contribution to the psychological treatment of depression. Trial registration ISRCTN92443999; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01542957.

Intoxication alcoolique aux urgences : dilemmes de prise en charge. Deux situations cliniques fréquentes. [The dilemma of defining "adequate" ED care for acute alcohol intoxication. About two case reports]

L'intoxication éthylique aiguë (IEA) est un motif de recours fréquent en médecine d'urgence. Bien qu'évoluant de manière spontanément favorable dans la majorité des cas, un certain nombre de complications sont susceptibles de survenir dans ce contexte, entrainant des répercussions significatives sur le pronostic des patients. Or, les altérations neurocomportementales accompagnant classiquement ce type d'intoxication mettent régulièrement les cliniciens face à des dilemmes de prise en charge complexes à résoudre. D'autre part, si les propriétés de l'éthanol peuvent atténuer l'expression clinique de certaines pathologies, un certain nombre d'affection de nature métabolique ou neurologique sont susceptibles d'être interprétées à tort comme des IEA. La littérature médicale ne fournissant que peu d'outils d'aide à la décision dans ce domaine, il est souvent difficile de trouver un compromis acceptable entre recours excessif aux examens complémentaires et banalisation face aux patients alcoolisés. A partir de situations cliniques, le présent article propose une approche pragmatique de deux problématiques régulièrement associées à une IEA et sources d'erreur diagnostique, le traumatisme crânien et l'état d'agitation. Ainsi, une meilleure définition des conditions de recours au scanner cérébral en cas de traumatisme crânien et l'adoption d'un protocole de sédation précoce dans l'ivresse excito-motrice doivent permettre de contourner en partie les difficultés soulevées par ces patients.

Posterior migration of lumbar disc herniation - imaging dilemma due to contrast contraindication: a case report

Disc herniation with posterior epidural migration is a rare and often symptomatic entity. Multiple are the natural barriers that prevent this pattern of migration. Enhanced magnetic resonance imaging is the diagnostic modality of choice in these cases. The diagnostic dilemma in this case was the contraindication to the use of contrast since the patient was known to have chronic renal failure.

Innovaattorin dilemma - Kehittäminen vs. Parantaminen

Työssä tutkimme parantamis- ja kehittämisstrategiaa ja niiden yhteiskäyttöä eli ambidekstriaa. Tavoitteenamme on tuoda parantamis- ja kehittämisstrategian erot esille ja sijoittaa strategiat tuotteen elinkaarelle. Esittelemme organisaation ambidekstrian hallintaa ja vaikeuksia. Esittelemme ensin parantamis- ja kehittämisstrategian termit, eri innovaatiostrategiat ja tuotteen elinkaari mallit ja ambidekstrian kirjallisuuden pohjalta. Tämän jälkeen esittelemme case materiaalimme. Materiaalin pohjalta sijoitamme strategiat tuotteen elinkaarelle ja tuomme casessa esiintyneitä ambidekstrian ominaisuuksia esille. Tavoitteemme pohjalta voimme sanoa, että tuotteen elinkaaren vaiheilla ja parantamis- ja kehittämisstrategioilla on selvä yhteys ja strategiat sijoittuvat hyvin elinkaarelle. Ambidekstrian hallitseminen, eli parantamis- ja kehittämisstrategian tasapainon löytäminen ei ole helppoa, sillä strategiat ovat hyvin erilaisia keskenään. Hallinta vaatii paljon työtä, hyvän reagointikyvyn ja ennustamisen taidon, jotta yritys pysyy mukana muutoksessa ja mielellään hieman edellä, jos mielii teknologiajohtajaksi.