Neurobiologia, coscienza e neuroetica. Ricerche filosofiche in margine al dialogo tra G.P. CHANGEUX e P. RICOEUR

Le neuroscienze occupano oggi un ruolo essenziale nel dibattito scientifico e filosofico, nonché in quello delle scienze umane. Esse costituiscono la sfida più seria al sapere fin qui elaborato intorno ai fondamenti dell'esperienza di coscienza, poiché si propongono come capaci di rispondere alla domanda di origine e funzionamento della coscienza. Le neuroscienze cognitive stanno, oggi, rivoluzionando la nostra concezione della mente e delle sue funzioni. Ci forniscono nuovi dati sulla natura delle sensazioni, della memoria, della percezione e dei processi di astrazione. L'epistemologia è rientrata così pienamente nell'ambito di una disciplina sperimentale, come diversi filosofi (da Hume a Quine) hanno auspicato. È, alla fine, evoluta nell'esperienza odierna della cosiddetta "epistemologia sperimentale", luogo che coniuga il rigore sperimentale della scienza con la profondità e la sofisticazione argomentativa della tradizione filosofica. Come arriviamo a conoscere? Quali vincoli poniamo a quello che deve essere conosciuto? Perché seguiamo certe vie invece di altre? Come arriviamo a formulare giudizi e a prendere decisioni? Che valore ha la conoscenza già acquisita nell'elaborazione di nuove esperienze? In particolare, che peso hanno le aspettative e i ricordi in questo processo? Qual è il rapporto fra esperienza, conoscenza e memoria? Come si fissano e come si richiamano i ricordi? Qual è il rapporto fra coscienza e memoria? Sono alcune delle domande che l'autore si pone in questa ottica e alle quali cerca di rispondere, a partire dall'analisi e valutazione del dialogo-dibattito fra J.-P. Changeux e P. Ricoeur, per apprenderne il linguaggio, capire i problemi sollevati, adattarsi alla complessità della materia. Nel contesto della filosofia della mente, la "lettura" della discussione ripercorre i relativi percorsi attraverso l'analisi delle loro opere, da un lato quelle dello scienziato (sulla struttura e dinamica del cervello, la teoria dell'epigenesi e stabilizzazione selettiva, le speculazioni sull'uomo neuronale e i rilievi antropologici, le teorie della conoscenza e della coscienza, oltre che sulla conoscenza matematica, gli argomenti di estetica ed etica); dall'altro lato quelle del filosofo (dal Cogito riflessivo alla scoperta dell'ermeneutica, dalle eterogenee riflessioni sul Conflitto delle interpretazioni alla grande teoria sulla creatività del linguaggio, le conclusioni teoriche sull'ermeneutica del sé e l'ontologia dell'agire). Il punto di arrivo è la determinazione delle relative posizioni: quella di Changeux tra i neuroscienziati che si occupano di questioni filosofiche, epistemologiche ed etiche, e quella di Ricoeur tra i filosofi che si occupano di neuroscienze. La conclusione della tesi si svolge in un approfondimento teoretico che dalla nozione di "traccia" porta all'esperienza della "memoria", al fine di intrecciare i fili della discussione ripercorsa ed offrire una sponda non forzata al dibattito più ampio. Il tema della memoria è privilegiato per ragioni intrinseche, poiché si tratta di uno dei temi precipui delle neuroscienze, della filosofia della mente e della fenomenologia. A un primo livello viene instaurato su questo punto un confronto epistemologico tra la proposta della neurofenomenologia (Varala, ad esempio) e la posizione tenuta in particolare da Ricoeur rispetto ad essa e al suo "progetto unificante", posizione defilata e, per certi aspetti, criticamente dubbiosa sul fatto che si possa davvero giungere a un "terzo discorso". Si riferisce poi del largo interesse e dei risultati più significativi della riflessione fenomenologica antica e moderna sulla memoria. A un secondo livello vengono illustrati i programmi di ricerca recenti della neurofenomenologia su questo argomento all'interno delle scienze cognitive e si dà conto dei risultati più significativi. Ad un terzo e conclusivo livello, si approfondisce il significato teologico della memoria. Les neurosciences ont aujourd'hui un rôle essentiel dans le débat scientifique et philosophique, ainsi que dans celui des sciences humaines. Elles constituent le défi le plus sérieux aux savoir qu'on a construit jusqu'ici sur les fondements de l'expérience de conscience, attendu qu'elles-mêmes se considèrent capables de répondre à la demande sur l'origine e le fonctionnement de la conscience. Les neurosciences cognitives sont aujourd'hui en train de révolutionner notre conception de l'esprit et des ses fonctions. Elles nous offrent des nouvelles données au sujet de la nature de nos sensations, mémoire, perception et procédés d'abstraction. Aussi l'épistémologie est rentrée pleinement dans le domaine d'une discipline expérimentale, comme plusieurs philosophes (de Hume à Quine) l'ont souhaité. Elle s'est enfin adressée, dans l'expérience actuelle, vers la soi-disant "épistémologie expérimentale", lieu qui met en accord la rigueur expérimentale de la science avec la profondeur et la sophistiquée finesse argumentative de la tradition philosophique. Comment en arrivons-nous à connaître? Quels liens mettons-nous à ce qu'on doit être connu? Pourquoi suivons-nous certaines vois au lieu d'autres? Comment en arrivons-nous à formuler des opinions et à prendre des décisions? Quelle valeur a la connaissance qu'on a déjà acquise par l'élaboration des nouvelles expériences? En particulier, quelle est l'importance des attentes et des souvenirs dans cette évolution? Quel est le rapport entre expérience, connaissance e mémoire? Comment fixons et rappelons-nous nos souvenirs? Quel est le rapport entre conscience et mémoire? Ces sont quelques-unes des questions que l'auteur se pose dans cette perspective et aux quelles essaie de répondre a partir de l'analyse et l'évaluation du dialogue-débat entre fra J.-P. Changeux et P. Ricoeur, pour en apprendre le langage, comprendre les problèmes soulevés, s'adapter à la complexité du sujet. Dans le contexte de la philosophie du cerveau, la "lecture" du dialogue reparcourt les parcours des deux interlocuteurs par l'analyse de leur ouvrages, d'une part celles du savant (sur la structure et la dynamique du cerveau, la théorie de l'épigenèse et stabilisation sélective; les spéculations sur l'homme neuronal et les commentaires anthropologiques; les théories de la connaissance et de la conscience, de même que sur la connaissance de la mathématique, les sujets d'esthétique et étique; d'autre part celles du philosophe (du Cogito réflexif à la découverte de l'herméneutique, de les hétérogènes réflexions sur le Conflit des interprétations à la grande théorie sur la créativité du langage, les conclusions théoriques sur l'herméneutique du soi et l'ontologie de l'agir). L'issue est la determination des relatives positions: celle de Changeux parmi les neuro-scientifiques qui s'occupent de questions philosophiques, épistémologiques et éthiques, et celle de Ricoeur parmi les philosophes qui s'occupent de neurosciences. La conclusion de la thèse se développe dans un approfondissement théorétique que de la notion de "trace" à l'expérience de la "mémoire", à l'effet de nouer les fils de la discussion passée en revue et d'assurer un appui pas forcé au débat plus vaste. Le thème de la mémoire a été choisi pour des raisons intrinsèques, puisqu'il est un des thèmes principaux des neurosciences, de la philosophie de l'esprit et de la phénoménologie. Sur un premier plan épistémologique il est établi une comparaison entre la proposition de la neurophénoménologie (Varala, par exemple) et la position soutenue en particulier par Ricoeur au sujet de ce courant phénoménologique et de son "projet unifiant", position défilée et, à certains égards, critiquement hésitante sur le fait qu'on puisse vraiment en venir à un "troisième discours". On rend compte du grand intérêt et des résultats les plus significatifs de la réflexion phénoménologique ancienne et moderne sur la mémoire. Sur un second plan neurophénoménologique on illustre des plans de recherche récents sur cet argument au-dedans des sciences cognitives et on rend compte des résultats les plus distinctives. Sur un troisième et conclusif plan on approfondit le sens théologique de la mémoire.

Action publique concertée et gestion des sports de nature : une ethnographie participative au Conseil général du Bas-Rhin

En France, la décentralisation et la territorialisation de l'action publique ont fait des sports de nature un objet d'action publique légitime en donnant naissance à de nouveaux outils de management public dédiés à la concertation et à la planification des usages de la nature. Nés de l'article 52 de la Loi sur le sport modifiée en 2000, la Commission Départementale des Espaces, Sites et Itinéraires relatifs aux sports de nature (CDESI) et le Plan Départemental des Espaces Sites et Itinéraires relatifs aux sports de nature (PDESI) sont des outils de concertation territoriale dédiés à la gestion publique des sports de nature au niveau départemental. Un enjeu de ce travail tient à l'appréhension des transformations de l'action publique en s'attachant à l'étude des dispositifs de concertation sur les sports de nature. Un deuxième enjeu de ce travail s'attache à mettre en évidence les effets de la concertation en analysant les interactions et les différents modes d'engagements des acteurs au cours de la « chose publique en train de se faire » (Cefaï, 2002). Les acteurs s'engagent non seulement dans la concertation comprise comme une activité sociale faite d'interactions, mais ils s'engagent également dans la concertation en tant que processus d'action publique. Aussi, un autre enjeu de ce travail est d'appréhender les effets de la concertation par une analyse processuelle des engagements (Fillieule, 2004) des acteurs et des organisations. En mobilisant les outils conceptuels de la sociologie interactionniste, de la sociologie pragmatique, ainsi que de la sociologie structuraliste, l'analyse des situations interactionnelles a notamment permis d'identifier les procédures de cadrage et les techniques dramaturgiques mises en oeuvre par les interactants, ainsi que les répertoires argumentatifs mobilisés par ces acteurs pendant l « 'épreuve » de la concertation. Les confrontations des points de vue et les justifications des prises de positions des acteurs peuvent faire évoluer la configuration initiale des jeux d'acteurs même si, pour certains, ces changements ne restent parfois qu'éphémères. Les organisations s'engagent dans la concertation en fonction de la revendication d'une légitimité qui est à comprendre comme une forme militantisme institutionnel s'articulant autour de la valorisation d'une expertise militante, environnementale, institutionnelle, ou encore de leur statut de partenaire institutionnel. In France, decentralization and territorialization of public action have made outdoor sports become an object of public policies justifiable by giving birth to new tools of public management dedicated to the public consultation, the dialogue, and the planning of the uses of the landscapes. Indeed, born of article 52 of the Law on sport modified in 2000, the Departmental committee for Spaces, Sites and Routes relative to natural sports ( CDESI) and the Departmental Plan of Spaces Sites and Routes relative to natural sports ( PDESI) are governance tools dedicated to the public management of outdoor sports for counties. A challenge of this work is to understand the changes of public policy by focusing on the study of mechanisms for consultation on outdoor sports. A second item of this work is to highlight the effects of cooperation by focusing on the analysis of interactions and actor's commitments during the "public thing in the making" (Cefaï, 2002). Actors commit themselves not only in the dialogue included as a social activity made by interactions, but they also take part to the dialogue included as a process of public action. Also, another issue of this work is to understand the effects of consultation by a processual approach of individual commitments (Fillieule, 2004) of actors and organizations. Using the conceptual tools of symbolic interactionism, pragmatic sociology, and structuralist sociology, the analysis of interactional situations has highlighted the framing work and procedures implemented by the interactants, as well as the dramaturgical techniques and argumentative directories which, they mobilize during the "test" of the consultation. Confrontation of viewpoints and justifications of interactants' positions can evolve from their initial configuration sets, even if for some of them these changes are sometimes ephemeral. Organizations involve themselves according to demands of legitimacy which, are to understand as a shape institutional militancy articulating around the valuation of a militant, environmental, institutional expertise, or still around their status of institutional partner.

The database search problem: a question of rational decision making

This paper applies probability and decision theory in the graphical interface of an influence diagram to study the formal requirements of rationality which justify the individualization of a person found through a database search. The decision-theoretic part of the analysis studies the parameters that a rational decision maker would use to individualize the selected person. The modeling part (in the form of an influence diagram) clarifies the relationships between this decision and the ingredients that make up the database search problem, i.e., the results of the database search and the different pairs of propositions describing whether an individual is at the source of the crime stain. These analyses evaluate the desirability associated with the decision of 'individualizing' (and 'not individualizing'). They point out that this decision is a function of (i) the probability that the individual in question is, in fact, at the source of the crime stain (i.e., the state of nature), and (ii) the decision maker's preferences among the possible consequences of the decision (i.e., the decision maker's loss function). We discuss the relevance and argumentative implications of these insights with respect to recent comments in specialized literature, which suggest points of view that are opposed to the results of our study.

Rhétorique et cognition : perspectives théoriques et stratégies persuasives

D'une certaine manière, la rhétorique est un art cognitif. L'art de discourir en situation concrète dans l'espoir de faire adhérer l'auditoire à une thèse suppose une forte aptitude cognitive: celle de se représenter la façon dont l'auditoire lui-même se représente une situation rhétorique. Or, à partir du moment où agir sur les représentations d'autrui est facilité par des techniques rhétoriques ou sophistiques, la question de la tromperie verbale s'est immiscée dans des affaires de régulation sociale et, avec elle, des enjeux tant de crédibilité que de crédulité. Dans le cadre démocratique rendant encore plus aiguë une forme de dépendance à l'information d'autrui, la nécessité de croire tout comme la possibilité d'être leurré mettent à l'épreuve tant le fonctionnement social de la Cité que l'évaluation des informations et de leurs auteurs. Le but des contributions de cet ouvrage n'est pas de dénoncer les effets de certains schèmes argumentatifs que d'aucuns jugeraient fallacieux ni d'ajouter une couche nouvelle aux critiques des sophismes, mais d'étudier leur fonctionnement et leurs effets cognitifs hic et nunc. Quels sont les mécanismes langagiers et cognitifs qui expliquent la «performance» des arguments réputés fallacieux? Comment fonctionnent les stratégies rhétoriques à l'intersection entre cognition, sciences du langage et société? Cet ouvrage, issu du colloque Communication et Cognition: manipulation, persuasion et biais dans le langage, tenu à Neuchâtel du 26 au 28 janvier 2011, propose plusieurs propositions originales ou hypothèses stimulantes dans l'espoir qu'elles inspireront tant les chercheurs spécialisés en rhétorique et sciences du langage à aller voir du côté de la psychologie cognitive que les spécialistes de ce domaine à mettre en évidence la rhétoricité de leurs recherches. English version: In a way, rhetoric is a cognitive art. The art of speaking in concrete situations in the hope of gaining the audience's consent on a given issue requires the operation of a cognitive ability: that of being able to represent the way an audience represents itself a rhetorical situation. Nonetheless, once we consider that rhetorical or sophistic techniques influence people's representations, verbal deception becomes a matter of social regulation, together with issues of credibility and credulity. In a democratic context fostering a form of dependence towards other people's information, the necessity of believing everything and the possibility of being duped are challenges for both the social management of the City and the evaluation of information and of its sources. The contribution of the chapters of this volume is neither to be found in the condemnation of the fallacious effects of specific argument schemes nor in the addition of yet another layer to fallacy criticism, but in the study of how fallacies work, hic et nunc. What are the linguistic and cognitive mechanisms at play behind the "performance" of fallacious arguments? How do rhetorical strategies work at the interface of cognition, language science and society? This book gathers papers that were presented during the international conference Communication & Cognition: manipulation, persuasion and biases in language, held at the University of Neuchâtel in January 2011. A number of original proposals and stimulating hypotheses emerge from them: we hope that these will inspire researchers in the language sciences who specialise in rhetoric to take on board cognitive scientific insights but also researchers in cognitive science to engage with the rhetoricity of their own research.

Formalizing defeasible argumentation using a labeled deductive system

In the last years there has been an increasing demand of a variety of logical systems, prompted mostly by applications of logic in AI, logic programming and other related areas. Labeled Deductive Systems (LDS) were developed as a flexible methodology to formalize such a kind of complex logical systems. In the last decade, defeasible argumentation has proven to be a confluence point for many approaches to formalizing commonsense reasoning. Different formalisms have been developed, many of them sharing common features. This paper presents a formalization of an LDS for defensible argumentation, in which the main issues concerning defeasible argumentation are captured within a unified logical framework. The proposed framework is defined in two stages. First, defeasible inference will be formalized by characterizing an argumentative LDS. That system will be then extended in order to capture conflict among arguments using a dialectical approach. We also present some logical properties emerging from the proposed framework, discussing also its semantical characterization.

A logic programming framework for possibilistic argumentation: formalization and logical properties

In the last decade defeasible argumentation frameworks have evolved to become a sound setting to formalize commonsense, qualitative reasoning. The logic programming paradigm has shown to be particularly useful for developing different argument-based frameworks on the basis of different variants of logic programming which incorporate defeasible rules. Most of such frameworks, however, are unable to deal with explicit uncertainty, nor with vague knowledge, as defeasibility is directly encoded in the object language. This paper presents Possibilistic Logic Programming (P-DeLP), a new logic programming language which combines features from argumentation theory and logic programming, incorporating as well the treatment of possibilistic uncertainty. Such features are formalized on the basis of PGL, a possibilistic logic based on G¨odel fuzzy logic. One of the applications of P-DeLP is providing an intelligent agent with non-monotonic, argumentative inference capabilities. In this paper we also provide a better understanding of such capabilities by defining two non-monotonic operators which model the expansion of a given program P by adding new weighed facts associated with argument conclusions and warranted literals, respectively. Different logical properties for the proposed operators are studied

Multimodal counter-argumentation in the workplace : the contribution of gesture and gaze to the expression of disagreement

This paper examines argumentative talk-in-interaction in the workplace. It focuses on counter-argumentative references, which consist of the various resources that the opponent uses to refer to the origin/source of his/her opposition, namely the confronted position and the person who expressed it. Particular attention is paid to the relationship - in terms of sequential positioning and referential extension - between reported speech, polyphony, pointing gestures and shifts in gaze direction. Data are taken from workplace management meetings that have been recorded in New Zealand by the Language in the Workplace Project.

Naturaliser la procréation médicalement assistée : sens commun et représentations en dialogue

La constante évolution des biotechnologies de la procréation médicalement assistée (PMA) introduit des nouveautés qui perturbent les représentations de la famille et du « naturel » de la procréation notamment. Ces nouveautés engendrent des préoccupations aussi bien sociales qu'individuelles sur la légitimité et les conditions du recours à la PMA. Partant d'une approche dialogique de la communication, du langage et de la cognition ainsi que de la théorie des représentations sociales, nous faisons l'hypothèse que ces perturbations sont traitées différemment selon l'activité communicative dans laquelle les individus sont engagés. Nous avons alors travaillé à partir de deux corpus de données relevant d'un type d'activité communicative différent : un corpus de presse, de l'ordre d'un discours générique, portant sur la grossesse dite « tardive » (post-ménopause) et un corpus d'entretiens de recherche, de l'ordre d'un discours singulier, avec des couples qui ont recouru à la PMA, et portant sur la cryoconservation des zygotes. Nous appuyant sur les méthodes de l'analyse thématique et de l'analyse de discours, nous centrons notre examen sur les représentations sociales de la maternité (corpus de presse) et du « naturel » (corpus d'entretiens). Nous analysons ce que ces discours permettent d'accomplir socialement, étudions le rapport qu'ils établissent à l'ordre social et symbolique et interrogeons leurs fonctions en termes de processus de « naturalisation » de la PMA. Nos résultats montrent que les nouveautés de la PMA forcent les individus à se (re)positionner dans le champ des valeurs et des normes, lis montrent aussi que, dans ce contexte, les représentations sociales existantes sont mobilisées de différentes manières en fonction des visées argumentatives poursuivies. Ceci impliquant, par ailleurs, si ce n'est une transformation, du moins un renouvellement des représentations. Ils indiquent en outre que, bien que le discours de presse et celui des entretiens ne servent pas exactement les mêmes objectifs, leurs effets de « naturalisation » de la PMA sont comparables en termes de (re)construction de la norme. D'un point de vue dialogique, ils permettent aussi d'avancer que les polémiques sociales et individuelles sont non seulement articulées mais se co-constituent. Ils témoignent aussi du fait que la référence au « naturel » renvoie, plus qu'à un problème de perturbation de la « nature », à l'idée d'une menace de l'ordre social et symbolique. De ce point de vue, les réflexions sur les pratiques de PMA méritent d'être menées par la psychologie sociale et les sciences humaines et sociales plus largement. -- The constant evolution of biotechnologies of medically assisted procreation (MAP) introduces novelties that disturb representations of the family and, notably, of what is considered « natural » in procreation. These novelties give rise to social and individual questions about the legitimacy and the conditions of the use of MAP. Drawing upon a dialogical approach to communication, language and cognition, as well as social representations theory, a hypothesis is advanced that these disturbances are handled differently, depending on the communicative activity individuals are engaged in. Two corpuses of data, representing different communicative activity types, were used: a press corpus, reflecting a generic discourse on "late" pregnancy (post-menopause), and a research interviews corpus, reflecting particular discourses developed by couples who used MAP and have cryopreserved zygotes. Using methods of thematic and discourse analysis, the study focuses on social representations of pregnancy (press corpus) and of the "natural" (interviews corpus). The analysis questions what these discourses enable to achieve socially, how they relate to the social and symbolic order, as well as their function in "naturalising" MAP. The results show that MAP novelties force individuals to (re)position themselves in the field of values and norms. They also show that, in this context, existing social representations are mobilised in different ways depending on the argumentative aims that are being pursued. This implies, if not a transformation, at minimum a renewal of representations. Additionally the results indicate that, although press and interviews discourses might not serve the same aims, their effects on "naturalising" MAP are comparable in terms of (re)constructing the norm. From a dialogical perspective, the findings also allow us to argue that social and individual polemics are not only articulated with one another but are effectively co-constituted. They also evidence the fact that the reference to the "natural" brings forth, more than a problem of disturbing "nature", a threat to the social and symbolic order. From this perspective, reflections on MAP practices deserve further attention within social psychology and social and human sciences at large.

Argumentoivasta imagokuvaelmasta ekspoloristiseen selviytymiskertomukseen : vanhuspolitiikan tulkintakehyksen rakentuminen kunnallisissa teksteissä

Abstract: from an argumentative image tableau to an exploratory survival story - evolution of the interpretative frame of geriatrci policies in municipal texts

IN DUBIO PRO NATURA? A Philosophical Analysis of the Precautionary Principle in Environmental and Health Risk Governance

In this book, I apply a philosophical approach to study the precautionary principle in environmental (and health) risk decision-making. The principle says that unacceptable environmental and health risks should be anticipated, and they ought to be forestalled before the damage comes to fruition even if scientific understanding of the risks is inadequate. The study consists of introductory chapters, summary and seven original publications which aim at explicating the principle, critically analysing the debate on the principle, and constructing a basis for the well-founded use of the principle. Papers I-V present the main thesis of this research. In the two last papers, the discussion is widened to new directions. The starting question is how well the currently embraced precautionary principle stands up to critical philosophical scrutiny. The approach employed is analytical: mainly conceptual, argumentative and ethical. The study draws upon Anglo-American style philosophy on the one hand, and upon sources of law as well as concrete cases and decision-making practices at the European Union level and in its member countries on the other. The framework is environmental (and health) risk governance, including the related law and policy. The main thesis of this study is that the debate on the precautionary principle needs to be shifted from the question of whether the principle (or its weak or strong interpretation) is well-grounded in general to questions about the theoretical plausibility and ethical and socio-political justifiability of specific understandings of the principle. The real picture of the precautionary principle is more complex than that found (i.e. presumed) in much of the current academic, political and public debate surrounding it. While certain presumptions and interpretations of the principle are found to be sound, others are theoretically flawed or include serious practical problems. The analysis discloses conceptual and ethical presumptions and elementary understandings of the precautionary principle, critically assesses current practices invoked in the name of the precautionary principle and public participation, and seeks to build bridges between precaution, engagement and philosophical ethics. Hence, it is intended to provide a sound basis upon which subsequent academic scrutiny can build.

Braving the Storm: How Are Global Biofuel Policies Sustained Despite Being Contested? An Analysis of the Biofuel Discourses of the EU, Brazil and Mozambique

Considered as a remedy to multiple problems that our world is facing, biofuels are nowadays promoted on a global scale. Despite this globalised approach, however, biofuels are heavily contested. Not only the social implications of biofuels are disputed and uncertain, particularly in countries of the global South, but also their environmental and economic rationales. Given these huge controversies, policies promoting biofuels would seem difficult to maintain. Yet, support for them has been surprisingly well established on the political agendas. With the aim of understanding this puzzle, this study asks how the dominant approach to biofuels has been sustained on a global level. In order to answer this question, the meanings and assumptions in biofuel discourses are explored through the lens of Maarten Hajer’s “argumentative” discourse analysis. Based on the existence of a “partnership for sustainable bioenergy” between the EU, Brazil and Mozambique, the study takes these three locations as case studies. The analysis reveals that various discursive strategies, including a particular problem construction and the use of two main story-lines, have played an important role in ensuring the permanence of the global approach to biofuels. Moreover, while the discourse of critics against biofuels demonstrates that there is room for contestation, the analysis finds that the opponents’ discourse largely fails to target the most salient justification for biofuels. A more effective strategy for critics would therefore be to also question the problem constructions underpinning this main justification in the global discourse.

Promovendo a argumentação no ensino superior de química

Studies have demonstrated the importance of argumentation in science education. Based on this assertion, we have tried to develop argumentative abilities in chemistry undergraduate students through a teaching methodology based on case studies. The process culminated with class presentations by student groups about possible solutions for the cases. To assess the quality of students' argumentation, videotapes of group presentations were collected and analyzed using Toulmin's Argument Pattern (TAP). TAP illustrates the nature of an argument in terms of claims, data, warrants, backings, and rebuttals. The findings of this work support the idea that the case study approach is an effective strategy for enhancing students' ability to argument.

From transcendental to practical intersubjectivity: a social psychological approach to Kant's musical aesthetics

It is well known that Kant’s aesthetics is framed intersubjectively because he upholds the claim of taste to universality. However, the transcendental foundation of this shared universality is a supersensible ground which is taken for granted but which cannot be brought directly into communicative experience. Kant’s reliance on the synthetic a priori structure of aesthetic judgment also removes it from the sphere of observable personal interaction. This argumentative strategy exposes it to skeptical challenge and generates inaccessible references to inner representations (be they intuitions, categories of the understanding or rational ideas). It is not sufficient, as Kant did, to propose a description of aesthetic experience that is subjectively plausible and thereby claim its intersubjective validity. It is indispensable to embody intersubjectivity in behavior and language. In practical intersubjectivity, aesthetic attitudes are dealt with in a concrete and accessible manner without relying on mentalistic assumptions as a foundation. Conceptual terms such as 'agreeable’, 'beauty’, 'sublime’, 'ugly’, 'universality’ acquire new meaning in a conversational context and aesthetic claims are tested in a dialogical game semantics model.

RECUEIL DES ŒUVRES POÉTIQUES de Jehan Molinet. Ms. in-fol. sur papier de 201 f., demi-rel. v. f, tr. r. (Rel. du XVIIIe siècle.)

Complainte (La) de Grece

Monologues de l'Amoureux, en vers.

Contient : « Le Monologue de l'Amoureux, qui, en poursuivant ses amours, demoura trois heures a une fenestre pendu par les bras et enfin se coucha dedens ung baing, cuidant se coucher en une couchette ; » attribué à Guillaume Coquillart (?) ; « Le monologue de l'Amoureux, qui, par fortune, fut pendu à une goutière..... », attribué au même