Probable economic effect redesignation of certain articles from certain countries as eligible for duty-free treatment under the U.S. generalized system of preferences : report to the President on investigation no. 332-284

Mode of access: Internet.

Un análisis de la relación comercial entre Colombia y Estados Unidos en el marco de los acuerdos comerciales

Estados Unidos es el principal socio comercial de Colombia: es el país de destino del 36% de las exportaciones colombianas y el país de origen del 25% de las importaciones colombianas (DANE, 2011). La relación entre ambos profundizó sus lazos con el programa arancelario ATPA, luego ATPDEA, en virtud del cual al 80% de la oferta exportable de Colombia se le ofrecía ya sea con libre acceso al mercado estadounidense, o entrada con pago de arancel reducido. Posteriormente, la entrada en vigencia del TLC generó las bases para una relación comercial más profunda aún, que también incluyera beneficios para Estados Unidos y prolongara y profundizara los beneficios que Colombia ya recibía. Este trabajo se enfoca en analizar paso a paso el comportamiento del comercio entre ambos países a través de los años y, por supuesto, el comportamiento actual del comercio, teniendo siempre en cuenta el contexto económico mundial, así como el contexto económico bilateral.

Tratado de Libre Comercio Colombia-Estados Unidos

La autora identifica las principales características e implicaciones de la negociación del Tratado de Libre Comercio con los Estados Unidos, determinando como argumentos esenciales de este proceso la relación e importancia histórica de este país en materia comercial y política, la necesidad de continuar con las preferencias arancelarias, ATPDEA,** a largo plazo y especialmente enfrentar la competencia de otros países que han negociado acuerdos con Estados Unidos previamente. Sin embargo, destaca como principal requisito para abordar este acuerdo, que se retome la política de productividad y competitividad como elemento indispensable para diversificar las exportaciones y aprovechar las ventajas competitivas de nuestro país frente a este acuerdo y de cara a la internacionalización de la economía nacional.** Andean Trade Promotion and Drug Eradication Act.-----The author discusses the main characteristics and implications of the Free Trade Agreement with the United States by pointing out, as the most outstanding arguments of this process, the following: the relation with and the historical importance of the US in terms of trade and politics, the need to maintain tariff preferences and a long-term ATPDEA* *, and particularly the need to face the competitiveness of other countries that have reached agreements with that country before. Nevertheless, the author suggests to consider productivity and competitiveness policies as an essential factor to diversify exportations and to make good use of Colombia’s competitive advantages concerning this agreement, vis-à-vis the internationalization of its economy.

Barreiras regulatórias: um novo desafio para a governança da OMC

Over the last decades, there is an increasing concern around what should be the role played by the World Trade Organization before the proliferation of preferential and plurilateral trade agreements (PTAs). Moreover, the expansion of the trade agenda through issues not encompassed by the WTO agreements, such as sustainability and global value chains led to a process of fragmentation of international trade law, strengthening the false idea that there would be a complete antagonism between preferentialism and multilateralism. As tariff preferences have diminished in importance, non-tariff measures as domestic regulation have become relatively more significant as determinants of market access and the conditions of competition. Given this equation, and regarding the importance to safeguard the progress achieved by the multilateral trade system, the present article seeks to elucidate some points considered relevant to the regulatory barriers subject and, therefore, address the role that can be attributed to the WTO as a key to effective governance of trade regulatory cooperation

Verification of Certificates of Origin in Chile

Origin procedures concern both the issuance and verification of certificates of origin. Certification of origin consists of demonstrating that a product complies with standards of origin that qualify a good for access to the corresponding tariff preferences in a destination market, and that no triangulation has occurred in this process. Verification of origin means not only formally checking the validity of the certificate of origin, but also ensuring that the merchandise covered by the certificate genuinely qualifies as originating. All trade agreements carry rules on origin procedures, which continue to apply after the corresponding tariff reduction programmes have concluded.  This edition of the bulletin examines the case of Chile, because of the large number of trade agreements the country has signed.

Tariff-Specific Preferences and Their Influence on Price Sensitivity

For many services, consumers can choose among a range of optional tariffs that differ in their access and usage prices. Recent studies indicate that tariff-specific preferences may lead consumers to choose a tariff that does not minimize their expected billing rate. This study analyzes how tariff-specific preferences influence the responsiveness of consumers’ usage and tariff choice to changes in price. We show that consumer heterogeneity in tariff-specific preferences leads to heterogeneity in their sensitivity to price changes. Specifically, consumers with tariff-specific preferences are less sensitive to price increases of their preferred tariff than other consumers. Our results provide an additional reason why firms should offer multiple tariffs rather than a uniform nonlinear pricing plan to extract maximum consumer surplus.

Tourism Destination Preferences: A Longitudinal Analysis of Consumer Decision Sets

There have only been a small number of applications of consumer decision set theory to holiday destination choice, and these studies have tended to rely on a single cross sectional snapshot of research participants’ stated preferences. Very little has been reported on the relationship between stated destination preferences and actual travel, or changes in decision set composition over time. The paper presents a rare longitudinal examination of destination decision sets, in the context of short break holidays by car in Queensland, Australia. Two questionnaires were administered, three months apart. The first identified destination preferences while the second examined actual travel and revisited destination preferences. In relation to the conference theme, there was very little change in consumer preferences towards the competitive set of destinations over the three month period. A key implication for the destination of interest, which, in an attempt to change market perceptions, launched a new brand campaign during the period of the project, is that a long term investment in a consistent brand message will be required to change market perceptions. The results go some way to support the proposition that the positioning of a destination into a consumer’s decision set represents a source of competitive advantage.