SPC3, a synthetic peptide derived from the V3 domain of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) gp120, inhibits HIV-1 entry into CD4+ and CD4- cells by two distinct mechanisms.

The third variable region (V3 loop) of gp120, the HIV-1 surface envelope glycoprotein, plays a key role in HIV-1 infection and pathogenesis. Recently, we reported that a synthetic multibranched peptide (SPC3) containing eight V3-loop consensus motifs (GPGRAF) inhibited HIV-1 infection in both CD4+ and CD4- susceptible cells. In the present study, we investigated the mechanisms of action of SPC3 in these cell types--i.e., CD4+ lymphocytes and CD4- epithelial cells expressing galactosylceramide (GalCer), an alternative receptor for HIV-1 gp120. We found that SPC3 was a potent inhibitor of HIV-1 infection in CD4+ lymphocytes when added 1 h after initial exposure of the cells to HIV-1, whereas it had no inhibitory effect when present only before and/or during the incubation with HIV-1. These data suggested that SPC3 did not inhibit the binding of HIV-1 to CD4+ lymphocytes but interfered with a post-binding step necessary for virus entry. In agreement with this hypothesis, SPC3 treatment after HIV-1 exposure dramatically reduced the number of infected cells without altering gp120-CD4 interaction or viral gene expression. In contrast, SPC3 blocked HIV-1 entry into CD4-/GalCer+ human colon epithelial cells when present in competition with HIV-1 but had no effect when added after infection. Accordingly, SPC3 was found to inhibit the binding of gp120 to the GalCer receptor. Thus, the data suggest that SPC3 affects HIV-1 infection by two distinct mechanisms: (i) prevention of GalCer-mediated HIV-1 attachment to the surface of CD4-/GalCer+ cells and (ii) post-binding inhibition of HIV-1 entry into CD4+ lymphocytes.

Something Worth Fighting For: The Evolution of Lobbying Coalitions in the Emissions Trading System. Bruges Political Research Papers 50/2015.

This thesis attempts to understand who fought for influence within the European Union’s policy area of the Emissions Trading System (ETS). The ETS is a key aspect of the European Union’s (EU) climate change policy and is particularly important in light of the conclusions at the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris. It was first established in 2003 with Directive 2003/87/EC and completed its first major revision in 2008 with Directive 2009/29/EC. Between these two key Directives, the interplay between industrial and environmental incentives means that the ETS has created a dynamic venue for divergent interest groups. So as to identify the relevant actors, this paper applies the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) of Sabatier. Using position papers, semi-structured interviews, and unpublished documents from the EU institutions, this paper answers it primary research question in its identification of an economy-first and an environment-first lobbying coalition. These coalitions have expanded over time with the environment-first coalition incorporating Greenpeace and the economy-first coalition expanding even further in both scope and speed. However, the economy-first coalition has been susceptible to industry-specific interests. In its application of the ACF, the research shows that a hypothesised effect between the ACF’s external events and these lobbying coalitions is inconclusive. Other hypotheses stemming from the ACF relating to electricity prices and the 2004 enlargement seem to be of significance for the relative composition of the lobbying coalitions. This paper finds that there are certain limitations within the ACF. The findings of this thesis provide a unique insight into how lobbying coalitions within a key EU policy area can form and develop.

Looking beneath the Surface: Differences in Decision-Making Structures across Processes

The previous chapter presented the overall decision-making structure in Swiss politics at the beginning of the 21st century. This provides us with a general picture and allows for a comparison over time with the decision-making structure in the 1970s. However, the analysis of the overall decision-making structure potentially neglects important differences between policy domains (Atkinson and Coleman 1989; Knoke et al. 1996; Kriesi et al. 2006a; Sabatier 1987). Policy issues vary across policy domains, as do the political actors involved. In addition, actors may hold different policy preferences from one policy domain to the next, and they may also collaborate with other partners depending on the policy domain at stake. Examining differences between policy domains is particularly appropriate in Switzerland. Because no fixed coalitions of government and opposition exist, actors create different coalitions in each policy domain (Linder and Schwarz 2008). Whereas important parts of the institutional setting are similar across policy domains, decision-making structures might still vary. As was the case with the cross-time analysis conducted in the two previous chapters, a stability of 'rules-in-form' might hide important variations in 'rules-in-use' also across different policy domains.

Les trois siecles de notre littérature ou Tableau de l'esprit de nos écrivains depuis François I, Jusqu'en 1772 ... : tome second.

Mode of access: Internet.

Dictionnaire de litterature, dans lequel ou traité de tout ce qui rapport ... /

Mode of access: Internet.

Dictionnaire de litterature, dans lequel ou traité de tout ce qui rapport ... /

Mode of access: Internet.

Les trois siècles de la littérature françoise ou Tableau de l'esprit de nos écrivans : depuis François I, jusqu'en 1773 /

Mode of access: Internet.

Les trois siècles de la littérature françoise ou Tableau de l'esprit de nos écrivans : depuis François I, jusqu'en 1773 /

Mode of access: Internet.

Les trois siècles de la littérature françoise ou Tableau de l'esprit de nos écrivans : depuis François I, jusqu'en 1773 /

Mode of access: Internet.

Les trois siècles de la littérature françoise ou Tableau de l'esprit de nos écrivans : depuis François I, jusqu'en 1773 /

Mode of access: Internet.